Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?


by - Assoc. Editor -
Discuss on the Football Message Board   Print   | TigerNetcom Facebook ClemsonTigerNet Twitter TigerNet RSS Feed

Clemson senior linebacker Stephone AnthonyStephone Anthony
Sr. Linebacker
#42 6-2, 244
Polkton, NC

View Full Profile
was ejected for targeting in the third quarter of the Palmetto Bowl.

On a third down play, Anthony pushed Thompson as he was throwing it out of bounds. Anthony had some contact with Thompson's helmet but it was minimal. The refs took a few minutes to look at it on replay and decided it was indeed the correct call.

Do you think that it was the right call by the officials? Here is the video below from our friends at Saturday Down South.


Comment on this story
Tags: Stephone Anthony

Former Clemson RB signs with Bucs
Former Clemson RB signs with Bucs
Greenville to Host Clemson National Championship Autograph Session
Greenville to Host Clemson National Championship Autograph Session
Four Tigers in Kiper's 2019 NFL Mock Draft, none in Top 15
Four Tigers in Kiper's 2019 NFL Mock Draft, none in Top 15
Clemson, Georgia lead pre-spring top-25
Clemson, Georgia lead pre-spring top-25
Send Feedback to Tony Crumpton: Email | Comment
Discuss on the Football Message Board   Print   | TigerNetcom Facebook ClemsonTigerNet Twitter TigerNet RSS Feed
Post your comments!
Subject (Replies: 41) Author
spacer FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
TigerNet News
spacer I wonder how this thread will go***
york_tiger
spacer uh, no.***
tiger_swimmer®
spacer Re: uh, no.***
TIGERINJERSEY
spacer Re: uh, no.***
OrangeJase®
spacer Uh, Hail no!
clover65®
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
tigerfan22334®
spacer umm. Does spurrier attend AA meetings
RunJumpCatch
spacer But he is a quiter!***
Neal in NC®
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
stephen2907
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected - NO!
CUalum79ALLn65®
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected - NO!
7173TIGER®
spacer Of all the bad calls you list the
MackDaddy®
spacer Re: Of all the bad calls you list the
adam_ncnn®
spacer Re: I'll go with Death Valley's reply
metiger
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
kodibuddy
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
irmotgr78®
spacer a joke of a call
orngpurple®
spacer Re: a joke of a call
deleted
spacer if york and I agree on anything….
epifunny
spacer Wasn't that The Dude from WV?
deleted
spacer Re: Wasn't that The Dude from WV?
deleted
spacer You mean Swami?
york_tiger
spacer The only thing worse than this call...
RogerS®
spacer Re: The only thing worse than this call...
ptctiger93
spacer IF the ACC doesn't intervene on Clemson's behalf on this
coachmac
spacer Zebra Morons
CaptainB1
spacer As bad as the targeting call was...
longtallsam®
spacer that was horrible call as well
camdentiger09®
spacer Re: that was horrible call as well
richmaja®
spacer Bordeline personal foul call but definately not targeting
gripitnripit
spacer ACC replay officials need to be ejected.***
Clemsnman®
spacer Dabo said it best
PsychoTea
spacer They "took a few minutes"?
BlackFriar
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
chsapp
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
Tiger95
spacer No, one of the worst calls for targeting***
wueagle86®
spacer So is Anthony out for the first half of the bowl game?
clempsun
spacer Yes he will miss 1st half.***
TigersAndCubs
spacer It was roughing, but no way in #### that was targetting or
TigersAndCubs
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
cougartigerfan
spacer Re: FB Update: Should Anthony been ejected for targeting foul against Scar?
jeancooper®
Sign Up for E-Mail News Alerts
Features
Breaking
Daily Digest