The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?


by - Senior Writer -
Clemson hasn't had as much success in intermediate passing early. (USA TODAY Sports-Mark Konezny)
Clemson hasn't had as much success in intermediate passing early. (USA TODAY Sports-Mark Konezny)

What has happened to the middle of the field for the Clemson offense?

The Clemson offense has been good this season, ranking 21st nationally in total offense. One complaint seen on social media has been the lack – or the perceived lack – of using the middle of the field. Too many screen passes, not enough deep shots for a team that has a smorgasbord of deep threats and one of the best quarterbacks in college football.

Clemson head coach Dabo Swinney was asked about that on his Monday conference call, and he said the UNC defense took away the middle of the field in the Tigers’ 21-20 victory Saturday.

"They did a pretty good job for the most part. We had a couple of communication issues. We had some negative plays but averaged about four yards a carry. They were playing four down (linemen) but tried to take away some things over the middle. We had some really good things there. Look at some of our drives ... seven plays, nine plays, 10 plays and then come away with nothing. Just efficiency ... not good, not like we need to be and we lacked rhythm."

As for the screens, which Clemson fans love to hate after the Rob Spence era, the coaching staff uses the wide receiver screen game as an extension of the running game. On the first drive Saturday, three of the first seven plays were wide receiver screens and they gained a total of four yards.

However, the Tigers attempted just one more wide receiver screen in the half, a pass to Diondre Overton with a little over five minutes remaining that gained no yards. Three screens were called in the third quarter, with two of those going to running back Travis Etienne for a total of three yards. The lone wide receiver screen lost a yard when Cornell Powell fell down with a ton of running room.

Clemson ran just six offensive plays in the fourth quarter with the game on the line and none of those were screens. In all, there were five wide receiver screen passes and they gained three yards on the day.

How different is that from last season? In the last five games last season, 34-of-169 pass attempts were screens. In the first five games this season, 29-of-136 pass attempts have been screens. So, 20.1 percent of the passes in the last five games a year ago were screen passes, and that number is at 21.1 percent this season (data per ESPN Stats & Info). Not a ton of difference.

Swinney said against UNC, there was no intermediate passing game allowed.

“There wasn't anything intermediate with these guys. They were taking that away,” Swinney said. “The throws were outside. We missed an opportunity on the slant, the ball got batted down. That was a poor protection call on us as coaches. We had Tee open on another play but our protection wasn't good at running back. We've been pretty good. And Trevor hasn't played in all those games. The Georgia Tech game ... we just ran the ball for 400 yards because that's what the game dictated.”

With the middle of the field is taken away, the Tigers used 11 sideline passes against the Heels. Four of the first five went for chunk plays and big yards (over the first 25 minutes) but the Tigers were held without another big completion to the sideline the rest of the game.

It is interesting to note the stats on Clemson’s passing game to date – on slants or seam routes with Lawrence in the game the Tigers are 5-of-11 with one touchdown in five games. That is once again similar to the final five games of 2018 when Lawrence was 6-of-13 with a touchdown.

But that intermediate passing game is where the struggles start. In passes 1-10 yards downfield, the Tigers had a 7.4 net yards/attempt in 2018 and it’s just 2.7 yards/attempt in 2019. On passes 11-20 yards downfield, it was 12.1 NY/A in 2018 and just 8.2 in 2019.

What is the big difference in that part of the field? Hunter Renfrow? Renfrow was always a weapon in the middle of the field, especially on third down, and came away with circus catch after circus catch with the game on the line. The stats show Clemson is fine on passes down the field and the passing game behind the line of scrimmage is on par with the end of last season. But on passes from 1-20 yards down the field, it’s been a struggle.

Swinney, however, just wants the Tigers to make the layups and he thinks the offense will be ok.

"We can't just look at stats and make assumptions," Swinney said. "Every game is a season of its own. That game those throws weren't over the middle because the safeties were down low. We had JC Chalk and No. 8 (Justyn Ross) wide open for a touchdown and missed that throw. We hit Ross down the middle and again and those were big plays. One was a crossing route. They tried to play press man outside, which is why Tee (Higgins) had a big game.

"We had the right plays. We just didn't execute very well and we couldn't get into rhythm. We didn't make the layups. It was like a comedy of errors, to be honest with you. They also kept the ball."

Comment on this story
Print   
Tags: Diondre Overton, Travis Etienne, Cornell Powell, Hunter Renfrow, JC Chalk, Justyn Ross
Send Feedback to David Hood: Email | Comment
WATCH: Dabo Swinney after Wednesday's practice
WATCH: Dabo Swinney after Wednesday's practice
Advanced outlook: Clemson-Louisville projections
Advanced outlook: Clemson-Louisville projections
Two former Tigers selected in XFL draft
Two former Tigers selected in XFL draft
WATCH: Clemson-Louisville Preview
WATCH: Clemson-Louisville Preview
Post your comments!
Subject (Replies: 44) Author
spacer TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
TigerNet News
spacer I was asking this question, but only watching on TV
dagummit
spacer Regarding the screens...
7173TIGER®
spacer Re: Regarding the screens...
davidhood®
spacer Re: Regarding the screens...
allorangeallthetime52®
spacer Re: Regarding the screens...
CU13®
spacer RIP CJ
Neal in NC®
spacer Re: Regarding the screens...
TigerBigBass
spacer with our stable of wrs
tgrfan42069
spacer Re: Regarding the screens...
djones73
spacer Re: Regarding the screens...
TigersO
spacer Re: So far this season
clemvol
spacer Whenever the coaches are wrong . . .
mrmatt
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
Spartantiger97
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
kerigantoo®
spacer ETN must step up his blocking effort. 3 times, #21 for UNC
cdj001
spacer Chazz Surratt
tbennett117
spacer Re: ETN must step up his blocking effort. 3 times, #21 for UNC
TigersO
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
mimiandpop1
spacer The biggest problem with the OL was the 6 false starts
David78®
spacer So what was open?
T3Tiger
spacer Re: So what was open?
mattycu
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
Tigerlife2005
spacer That's what I was saying
T3Tiger
spacer Re: That's what I was saying
Tigers_Panthers
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
ddclemson
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
Calhoun2®
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
COTIGER1
spacer How did UNC take away the short-middle with 2 high safeties?
Razzmatazz
spacer Re: How did UNC take away the short-middle with 2 high safeties?
hierster
spacer black hole
pawsitivelytiger
spacer WRU is a misnomer if our O falls all to shat when a former
CM Shack
spacer the truth triggers cowards***
CM Shack
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
ComeonMan
spacer Passes to middle of the field have definitely been lacking
colberttiger
spacer Re: Passes to middle of the field have definitely been lacking
04CU07
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
allorangeallthetime52®
spacer It's just a poor job of scheming plays, bottom line.
jbrock11®
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
sgary25
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
Watkins Hopkins®
spacer The middle of the field should have been wide open
coachmac
spacer Re: The middle of the field should have been wide open
Watkins Hopkins®
spacer Situational play calling was the issue!!!
turfman
spacer Re: Situational play calling was the issue!!!
turfman
spacer Re: TNET: The Renfrow Effect?: What has happened to middle of field for offense?
kfast600
Sign Up for E-Mail News Alerts
Features
Breaking
Daily Digest