|
Replies: 49
| visibility 4,428
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 42
Joined: 3/14/13
|
Dawgs on their board saying
Apr 30, 2013, 11:16 PM
|
|
"We are glad we are the underdog, we will show the world we can kill these tiggers" blah blah blah. Shut up with your virgin defense.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/11
|
Re: Dawgs on their board saying
Apr 30, 2013, 11:25 PM
|
|
Hahah bout to be prom night for that D on Aug 31st.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [186]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 241
Joined: 10/27/02
|
Re: Re: Dawgs on their board saying
May 1, 2013, 12:24 AM
|
|
Without a doubt the greatest comment I've ever seen on tigernet
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/11
|
Re: Re: Re: Dawgs on their board saying
May 1, 2013, 1:14 AM
|
|
Thank you sir
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55373]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58381
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: Dawgs on their board saying
May 1, 2013, 1:45 AM
|
|
With you being a very new member to this board kind of make's me believe that you are one of those dogs that are Tiger killers. If y'all do beat us with that (as you call it) virgin defense. Y'all are some bad boyzs!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 42
Joined: 3/14/13
|
Re: Dawgs on their board saying
May 1, 2013, 2:47 AM
|
|
Yeah im a leg humper with a 100% tiger pulse and all of my other posts are about Clemson and this is my first post concerning UGAy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [567]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 939
Joined: 3/26/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [49613]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30357
Joined: 12/10/98
|
Torched for the very first time?***
May 1, 2013, 6:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
No different than you saying you are going to beat us.
May 1, 2013, 7:54 AM
|
|
Both defenses have huge ?. I can't wait to see Murray and Gurley shred that vaunted tiger defense. Haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 8:07 AM
|
|
Apparently, you know something I don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Yes. please tell us.... do you mean...
May 1, 2013, 2:20 PM
|
|
The loss of Goodman, the overall most underachieving starting DE end we've ever had? Or do you mean the two Senior Safeties we had graduate that couldn't cover for the life of them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
Well they weren't very good last year.
May 1, 2013, 8:11 AM
|
|
What makes you think that they would be good this year? Same unit right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
May 1, 2013, 8:29 AM
|
|
If this is in reply to my request for enlightenment, your response is about as misinformed as I expected. Our D grew up throughout the season, especially up front. If you think we're going to put the "same unit" on the field, you're going to be shocked and awed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
May 1, 2013, 8:36 AM
[ in reply to Well they weren't very good last year. ] |
|
Wrong....add in a 5 star recruit to the backfield mix, along with another 4 star, and a unit that if you watch the game againt that vaulted LSU in the mighty SEC of yours, you'd hear all through the game it was our Defense that controlled that game....and just to think, they'll be even better then that when they play GA...where as GA will have so fresh of one to stop the same offense that left Montgomery, Mingo, and several others laying on their backs by 4th quarter. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Ok, that's about what I would expect a group of fans to say
May 1, 2013, 8:19 AM
|
|
on their own message board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108390]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
which group? the classic underachievers?***
May 1, 2013, 8:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Is that not the epitome of Mark Richt and his Dawgs?***
May 1, 2013, 8:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
Dude they didn't even finish in the top 50***
May 1, 2013, 8:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
How much could they have grown up?***
May 1, 2013, 8:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [544]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 867
Joined: 4/24/12
|
At least we know how to spike a ball***
May 1, 2013, 8:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
May 1, 2013, 2:40 PM
|
|
We all know how to spike a ball
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: How much could they have grown up?***
May 1, 2013, 8:53 AM
[ in reply to How much could they have grown up?*** ] |
|
I don't know why I'm bothering to answer, but just compare the first half of the season with the second half and you'll have your answer. Our only real issue on D last year was the number of explosive plays we gave up. Time after time, we'd get a team in a third-and-long situation only to give up the first down. That problem was not near as big an issue later in the season. I point to a secondary decimated by injury and the lack of pass rush early last season. The pass rush got much better (ask Mettenderper) and the secondary will be healthy and more talented this time around.
We didn't finish in the top 50 in defense? LOL. Did you bother checking to see how much we improved? Of course not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
May 1, 2013, 8:33 AM
|
|
I'm sure you do bud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [544]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 867
Joined: 4/24/12
|
Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
May 1, 2013, 8:35 AM
|
|
especially if it was against bama with time running out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
May 1, 2013, 8:39 AM
|
|
Saying we should have spiked the ball shows how little you know.
And you would have been destroyed by Bama last season
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [544]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 867
Joined: 4/24/12
|
Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
May 1, 2013, 8:40 AM
|
|
You made a account just to say that? Did I get under your skin that much?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
May 1, 2013, 8:40 AM
|
|
You mean that LSU team that was highly in motivated, had a bad offense, and almost lost to Auburn?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [544]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 867
Joined: 4/24/12
|
Re: Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
May 1, 2013, 8:41 AM
|
|
LSU would have destroyed you last year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
Wait so your freshmen are going to be studs
May 1, 2013, 8:43 AM
|
|
But ours won't? We have several 5 stars and 4 stars on the defense, but I'm not going to predict anything until I see them play. I like your logic though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [544]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 867
Joined: 4/24/12
|
Re: Wait so your freshmen are going to be studs
May 1, 2013, 8:44 AM
|
|
You have 7 new starters on defense right? Too bad they have to play their first game against one of the best offenses int eh country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Re: Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
May 1, 2013, 8:43 AM
|
|
Ha ha ha ok bro
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
I've already acknowlede***
May 1, 2013, 8:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
Re: I've already acknowlede***
May 1, 2013, 8:49 AM
|
|
My bad. My fingers are too big for my phone. I've already acknowledged that our defense is going to be young. I wasn't defending that. You're the one trying to make an argument for your defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: I've already acknowlede***
May 1, 2013, 8:55 AM
|
|
It's not really an agruement from anyone on our defense...the basic thing is our defense was weak in the secondary...not the whole defense, mainy just the secondary (and slight issues with the pass rush here and there).
We've plugged those secondary holes with some new recruits (one of them being the #4 overall recruit of 2013, Mackenzie Alexander) and some guys that are stepping up better than last year (at least by reports during spring practice). For me, just saying I wouldn't be holding out high hopes that our defense will be like early last years....it's more likely to be like the defense that played LSU or better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3025
Joined: 8/19/08
|
Going to be hard to kill anything when your entire D
May 1, 2013, 8:50 AM
|
|
Is laying on the field cramping come the middle of the 3rd... Poor guys, almost feel sorry for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
I see you guys using that cramping argument alot.
May 1, 2013, 8:53 AM
|
|
We are well conditioned and s.c. heat is no different than georgia heat so find a new argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
My point is this.
May 1, 2013, 8:57 AM
|
|
You have nothing, but speculation about your defense. Same as ours. You can't prove that you will be better, but they may. At this point it is all just personal opinon. By the way Mettenberger is horrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Wrong again, buttbreath. Do you not realize we return
May 1, 2013, 9:02 AM
|
|
practically the whole front seven and get back our veteran corners? We're not "speculating" about a brand new unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7831]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20489
Joined: 10/9/04
|
Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 8:57 AM
|
|
Secondary.... Specifically corner back
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 9:00 AM
|
|
I knew you would weigh in with that very comment. If you don't know why our secondary was weak last year and why it will be much improved this year, you don't know your anus from a knot in a tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 9:07 AM
[ in reply to Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D. ] |
|
season-long injuries and lack of depth explain that one. This year, read up...now have depth bult that wasn't there last year, new recruits (which yes are questionable till summer), all injured players are beack to full health, and several defensive guys being moved back to their natural and better spots. Just saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
It doesn't matter if you return every player
May 1, 2013, 9:05 AM
|
|
If they aren't good. Are you guys going to make chicken salad out of chicken crap? My comments were honest and fair. I'm sorry you can't handle the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Riiiiiiiight. Our defense sucks. Gotcha.
May 1, 2013, 9:15 AM
|
|
Shock and awe headed your way, SocialButtsniffer09.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7831]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20489
Joined: 10/9/04
|
Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 9:06 AM
|
|
We are thin at cb. Do you deny that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 9:13 AM
|
|
As long as Darius and Jenkins are healthy, then yes, I definitely deny that. We have such an influx of talent coming in our problem--if, indeed we have a problem at CB--will be inexperience. Alexander and Baker will push the guys we have. Alexander just may be the Sammy Watkins of this class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [121]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 472
Joined: 3/18/13
|
Re: Riiiiiiiight. Our defense sucks. Gotcha.
May 1, 2013, 9:20 AM
|
|
Well you haven't exactly proven that it doesn't so. By the way corner back is the hardest skill position in football. It's nothing like playing wr. So while Alexander will probally be a great player, I doubt he will come in as a freshman and shut ppl down right away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7831]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20489
Joined: 10/9/04
|
Re: Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 9:23 AM
|
|
Lets hope so on Alexander. We should be much improved, but one injury at cb..... Could put us right back into giving up large plays.... We are lacking experienced depth at cb.
I expect this game to be a barn burner....JawJa will field a solid team and so will we. It'll come down to who coughs up the ball the least
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
May 1, 2013, 9:30 AM
|
|
I expect Alexander and Baker both to avoid a redshirt. Blanks did a decent job last season playing out of his natural position. With him at safety Robinson, Jenkins, Alexander and Baker at corner, I have confidence in our secondary.
I agree UGAy will score points. I expect them to put up in the neighborhood of 28-31. I also expect the score to be very close until some time in the 3rd. I do not think they can match our offense, however. We'll be able to score at will in the 4th. I'm looking for a relatively high-scoring game, maybe 45-31 Tigers. It will be our D which will get the critical stops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 49
| visibility 4,428
|
|
|
50
