»
Topic: FB Update: Clemson games ranked #1 and #2 non-conference SEC matchups of 2014
Replies: 20   Last Post: Mar 7, 2014 5:30 PM by: cupton®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Board Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 20   Pages: 1  

FB Update: Clemson games ranked #1 and #2 non-conference SEC matchups of 2014


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 3:35 PM
 

Clemson games ranked #1 and #2 non-conference SEC matchups of 2014

Read Update »



Locker room material!

[1]
Posted: Mar 3, 2014 3:38 PM
 

"A rivalry means the two teams trade wins, but there hasn’t been any winning by Clemson in five years. The Tigers will get another chance this year in front of the home crowd on rivalry weekend. But do we really think the outcome will be any different?"


Re: Locker room material!


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 3:57 PM
 

why would they think the outcome will not be the same??? we have player horrible for 5 years now so????


Re: Locker room material!

[2]
Posted: Mar 3, 2014 4:11 PM
 

We've lost 5 years in a row, we should be at the point where locker room material isn't needed...


My Lord - pathetic piece of journalism


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 4:12 PM
 

If a rivalry means that each team trades wins back and forth, then this has only been a rivalry since 2009 - not the other way around. The SEC bloggers, such as Schlabach, are hilarious to read form an objective standpoint. The bulldogs are sure to have revenge on their mind, but we won't want to prove anything with a new QB/offense? ESPN has become a joke.


Re: My Lord - pathetic piece of journalism


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 4:20 PM
 

ESPN??? I thought this was only a SEC blogger on his on site?


Re: My Lord - pathetic piece of journalism


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 7:00 PM
 

They are sec bought and paid for. Heck, they don't even try to mask it.


Re: My Lord - pathetic piece of journalism


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 11:28 PM
 

Face guys Sc owns us right now we got to change that next year


Re: Re: My Lord - pathetic piece of journalism


Posted: Mar 7, 2014 5:28 PM
 

Nah not even a hint of owning us. Thats why no urgency. Itll right itself


I wonder if Jon Boy would care to make a couple of bets?***


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 3:39 PM
 




This is the new reputation of our rivalry. We need to fix this 2014***


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 3:48 PM
 




Re: This is the new reputation of our rivalry. We need to fix this 2014***


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 8:34 PM
 

No it isnt. Itll take a lot more than 5 to even take it seriously


Re: This is the new reputation of our rivalry. We need to fix this 2014***


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 9:25 PM
 

by dabo standards the Georgia game is not a rivalry game either it is a domination by Georgia like he said our game is not a rivalry with the coots because we have dominated them. amiright? may not be germans but take with a grade of slaw.


Re: Re: This is the new reputation of our rivalry. We need to fix this 2014***


Posted: Mar 7, 2014 5:30 PM
 

That means Scar has NO rivals. Everyone owns them lol


They didn't mention


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 4:24 PM
 

Georgia can play music this year. They should have, since that was the ONLY reason we won!


Heartbreaker? Tigers up 10 and the game was over at

[1]
Posted: Mar 3, 2014 5:32 PM
 

that point. The last score was not relevant to the out come. The Tigers D beat them and will be better this year. UGAy offense will not produce 35 points against our defense. I look for maybe 13 or 14 points max. We will not have to score 38 points to beat anybody next year.


Re: FB Update: Clemson games ranked #1 and #2 non-conference SEC matchups of 2014


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 6:58 PM
 

Clemson should be able to go down there and whip their butts. We match up very well against them. Last year's game was close, but it shouldn't have been that close. A couple of long plays by them made the game much better than it should have been. Granted, they have great talent, but so do we. I hope they think we will not be a factor. If they take this game for granted, they get that butt spanked again. IMO


Re: FB Update: Clemson games ranked #1 and #2 non-conference SEC matchups of 2014


Posted: Mar 3, 2014 10:05 PM
 

By golly I sure the he11 hope so!!!!


#8. Bama vs. WVU. They're sure setting the standards high.


Posted: Mar 4, 2014 7:26 AM
 

Playing a 4-8 WVU in Atlanta is a big-time OOC game for Bama? The 'SEC hype' in its most blatant transparency.


Re: #8. Bama vs. WVU. They're sure setting the standards high.

[1]
Posted: Mar 4, 2014 10:12 AM
 

Hey, it's SEC law to have at least one Bama mention in anything written about SEC football. It's a safety clause. If not mentioned, Bama fans would drive to their company's headquarters guns a-blazin'. But looking at their schedule, what other game would they choose? Western Carolina? Florida Atlantic might be a top 10 team this year, right? Uh... no. Seriously, Bama is a top 5 team year in and year out. Play someone out of conference with a pulse!

My question is how did any Arkansas game make the list? Definitely scrapping the bottom of the barrel with that pick. I guess I would tune in toward the end of the game to see how many of Bilema's players had died due to the leading killer of college football atheltes across the nation, that dreaded hurry up no huddle. Soultaker of 26 Baylor football player a week. Curse you, HUNH!!!

BTW, is Tennessee switching to a HUNH? Might explain why they signed 73 players this last recruiting cycle.

~JKB


Re: FB Update: Clemson games ranked #1 and #2 non-conference SEC matchups of 2014


Posted: Mar 7, 2014 5:29 PM
 

Saturday Down South aka SEC homer website. I don't expect anything less than some full on Clemson bashing.


Replies: 20   Pages: 1  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Kent State
FOR SALE: Two seats in section H, row X, on South Side. $65 OBO. Text me for meeting in Spartanburg or see my ...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Board Archive ]
Start New Topic
2467 people have read this post