Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Things are gonna get nasty. Why would Dr. Ford
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 68
| visibility 1

Things are gonna get nasty. Why would Dr. Ford


Sep 17, 2018, 10:02 AM

want to ruin her life like this?


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I ask this to ALL sides of the political spectrum here: Is there NO limit?


Sep 17, 2018, 10:09 AM

An unsubstantiated claim of sexual assault in high school from a registered Democrat on the eve of SCOTUS confirmation? The Stanford professor says it derailed her?

Disclaimer: I didn’t read the entire article so perhaps there is more to it than that? This just seems so thinly veiled and absurd.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


She has her therapist’s notes from 2012 when she


Sep 17, 2018, 10:12 AM

described the incident to her.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


so, she was OK with a rapist being on the DC Circuit?


Sep 17, 2018, 10:26 AM

and why, exactly, did DiFi sit on this letter?

do the notes reflect the name?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


They don't reflect the name, and they say there were 4


Sep 17, 2018, 10:31 AM

attackers vs her story that there were two. Her explanation is that the therapist's notes were wrong.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


As someone who deals constantly with medical records


Sep 17, 2018, 11:22 AM

that don't exactly on point match my client's recollections, I'm inclined to think that's possible.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-fordprefect.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I wouldn't throw stones if you're okay


Sep 17, 2018, 11:13 AM [ in reply to so, she was OK with a rapist being on the DC Circuit? ]

With what happened to Garland.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


JoeG flagged for a nonsensical argument....


Sep 21, 2024, 11:37 AM

the issue of Garland not being taken up in an election year (Biden-rule as many would say) is not at all related to a claim of sexual abuse during high school and why it wasn't relevant to a position on the court of appeals.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Of course not, just dirty tactics on both sides.***


Sep 17, 2018, 12:01 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


2 different issues IMO***


Sep 17, 2018, 12:24 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

response using recent tbalm logic:


Sep 17, 2018, 11:20 AM [ in reply to I wouldn't throw stones if you're okay ]

This thread is about Kavanaugh, not Garland. NICE STRAW MAN.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


and B00M!! 84!!***


Sep 17, 2018, 11:47 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I hope Kavanaugh gets confirmed but I’m not


Sep 17, 2018, 11:59 AM [ in reply to response using recent tbalm logic: ]

going to criticize the dem tactics.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Something just doesn't add up here....


Sep 17, 2018, 12:32 PM

she sent a letter to her rep in HOR in early July and then sent a letter to Feinstein on July 30. All the while wishing to remain anonymous. All dems on the committee are told about the letter. She remains anonymous, and the letter is put in Kavanaugh's file and DOJ takes no action (I think). Then the week of his confirmation vote, she comes public, allegedly because the story was leaked last week.

It just doesn't seem to add up to me.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Assume some arm twisting going on.***


Sep 17, 2018, 12:35 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


nothinging happened to Garland.....NOTHING


Sep 17, 2018, 12:19 PM [ in reply to I wouldn't throw stones if you're okay ]

his reputation was not assassinated, he was not drug through the mud, every action of his life was not scrutinized.

He is just as successful and happy as he was before the nomination.



So what happens when Ginsberg or another liberal croaks in the next year?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well, thinking being on the SC would be


Sep 17, 2018, 12:37 PM

pretty important to the guy.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


being Head coach at clemson is important to me


Sep 17, 2018, 3:31 PM

not being interviewed has truly ruined my life!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lulz. Ok.***


Sep 17, 2018, 3:49 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: so, she was OK with a rapist being on the DC Circuit?


Sep 17, 2018, 3:45 PM [ in reply to so, she was OK with a rapist being on the DC Circuit? ]

Dude, you know why Feinstein sat on the letter.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I know why she sat on the washing machine.


Sep 17, 2018, 3:47 PM

Not so sure about the letter.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You mean the notes that name no one and contradict the


Sep 17, 2018, 10:33 AM [ in reply to She has her therapist’s notes from 2012 when she ]

Number of people that Ford says were there at the time?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Excuse me...professor at “Palo Alto University”, not Stanford.***


Sep 17, 2018, 10:57 AM [ in reply to I ask this to ALL sides of the political spectrum here: Is there NO limit? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


thats akin to Midlands Tech, right?***


Sep 17, 2018, 11:47 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


She previously worked at Pepperdine and Stanford. At


Sep 17, 2018, 11:57 AM [ in reply to Excuse me...professor at “Palo Alto University”, not Stanford.*** ]

Stanford she worked as a research psychologist and as a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Okay. I was just correcting myself because I read “Palo Alto


Sep 17, 2018, 12:29 PM

“ and just thought “Stanford.”

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


I have no idea what to make of this story.***


Sep 17, 2018, 10:14 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Likewise - timing is political but nevertheless requires ...


Sep 17, 2018, 12:20 PM

some investigation.

Seems there would be some sort of corroborating evidence. Also it seems that individuals who sexually assault women rarely do it one time - meaning there should be additional cases if true.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Trump should appoint Clinton to the Court


Sep 17, 2018, 10:24 AM

and watch the Dems do nothing regarding his multiple Rape charges. #DemHypocrites

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


your straw man


Sep 17, 2018, 10:31 AM

is really trying to muddy the waters on this one.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

not a straw man. I've said the same thing for 20 years


Sep 17, 2018, 10:32 AM

Democrats have consistently given Bill Clinton a pass for his rape behavior.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: not a straw man. I've said the same thing for 20 years


Sep 17, 2018, 10:34 AM

this thread is aboutBrett Kavanaugh, not bill Clinton.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

wrong. its a thread about politics. the Court has


Sep 17, 2018, 10:44 AM

become politics and Dr. Ford is intimately a political creature as adjudged by the attorney she hired.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


no matter how you spin it


Sep 17, 2018, 10:50 AM

Bill Clinton is still not running for SCOTUS, your straw man argument has been noted.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

doesn't matter. the same people opposing Kavanaugh


Sep 17, 2018, 10:54 AM

are the same people who support Bill and Hillary Clinton. This inherently weakens their argument in support of the accuser.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: doesn't matter. the same people opposing Kavanaugh


Sep 17, 2018, 10:55 AM

maybe find a candidate that is not all rapey and such.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

democrats will always have some perjurer on call***


Sep 17, 2018, 11:46 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


These situations are difficult...


Sep 17, 2018, 10:43 AM

The accusation must be taken seriously and investigated. If no evidence is found to corroborate or substantiate, then I would personally not let it affect my vote of confirmation, if I had one.

There is no reason to be in a big hurry. Investigate the claim as efficiently as possible, then address the confirmation based on the results of the investigation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

how do you investigate a 30yr old he said / she said?***


Sep 17, 2018, 10:46 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I don't know...I'm not an investigator.


Sep 17, 2018, 10:50 AM

I'm sure people who investigate for a living know how to do that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This is political theater created specificLly to delay until after the election


Sep 17, 2018, 10:55 AM [ in reply to These situations are difficult... ]

with the hope of getting a Democrat majority in the Senate and voting down this nominee.

I am not sure how you can say there is no hurry.

This whole thing is so blatant and unapologetically political. Honestly, an alleged, unsubstantiated claim of sexual assault from a California academic Democrat, kept quiet until his SCOTUS nomination and then kept quiet by the only Senator, a blatantly partisan one, who was given the information.

The whole thing is an embarrassment and a joke.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Well, I'm not interested in the politics of it...


Sep 17, 2018, 10:57 AM

I offer no words of support here for any Democrat or Republican, or actions they have taken on this so far.

If it's a false and unsubstantiated claim, as you say, then the investigation shouldn't take long.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I know you are above the partisanship of it, but I hope Dems realize how


Sep 17, 2018, 10:59 AM

low they are setting the bar with this blatant political stunt and the whole “turn about is fair play” thing.

Talk about a swamp.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


If it is a stunt, then that would reflect very poorly on


Sep 17, 2018, 11:03 AM

whoever is involved in it, for sure. It would hurt everyone, especially legitimate victims of abuse.

Unfortunately, the most likely result of the investigation is probably an inability to prove or disprove, which would leave everyone to just make a decision. As I said, unless it is substantiated, I would vote to confirm.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Help me out, lawyers. I’m pretty sure the Statute of Limitations was up long ago,


Sep 17, 2018, 11:14 AM

in which case no one would even investigate for criminal prosecution. Which, again, is why she went to a VERY partisan Senator during his confirmation hearing...and not...you know...the police.

Anyway, I did a quick review and it looks like at best it would be misdemeanor sexual assault, which is long past the SoL (and ticking, since again, she hasn’t reported a crime to the authorities). Maybe is she uses that “I thought he might kill me” line it could bump up? I don’t know the law well enough to say.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


The SOL doesn't apply to this...


Sep 17, 2018, 11:17 AM

there is no SOL for character evidence.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-fordprefect.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don’t understand. What’s “character evidence”?


Sep 17, 2018, 11:21 AM

You mean for taking this into consideration for the SCOTUS confirmation? Yes. I’m talking about criminal charges.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Am I mistaken, or did the person she claims


Sep 17, 2018, 11:26 AM [ in reply to Help me out, lawyers. I’m pretty sure the Statute of Limitations was up long ago, ]

"pulled him off of her" say it absolutely never happened?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GO TIGERS!!


I would say if it could be proven that the accusation


Sep 17, 2018, 12:00 PM [ in reply to If it is a stunt, then that would reflect very poorly on ]

is an intentional lie, that the false accuser should be prosecuted. That would give people a reason not to do it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

we are locked in this cycle until we do something vastly


Sep 17, 2018, 11:14 AM [ in reply to I know you are above the partisanship of it, but I hope Dems realize how ]

different. The Dems look back at Merrick Garland as a watershed event. The pubs looks back to Thomas/Hill. Until something drastic changes, this is the cycle of back and forth and lowering the bar that we will see forever.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-fordprefect.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

pubs look back to bork***


Sep 17, 2018, 12:42 PM



badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

im Still thinking this whole Trump thing


Sep 17, 2018, 1:04 PM [ in reply to we are locked in this cycle until we do something vastly ]

Is the vastly different thing in politics

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


How so?


Sep 17, 2018, 1:21 PM

Like scares everybody straight? Because politically, he's not really doing anything to slow down the burn.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-fordprefect.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You may not be. But everyone involved certainly is.***


Sep 17, 2018, 11:22 AM [ in reply to Well, I'm not interested in the politics of it... ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GO TIGERS!!


I'm sorry the search function doesn't work well


Sep 17, 2018, 11:27 AM [ in reply to This is political theater created specificLly to delay until after the election ]

Because I can't find your post calling out the refusal to consider Merrick Garland's nomination "blatant and unapologetically political".

I'm sure it is in the database somewhere though. Somewhere.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


It was unapologetically political.


Sep 17, 2018, 11:30 AM

But it wasn't a blatant character assassination. Can we at least agree there's a little difference?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GO TIGERS!!


In method, but not in purpose...


Sep 17, 2018, 11:41 AM

they are both heavy handed win at all costs attempts to prevent a major swing in the court's make up.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-fordprefect.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Take it up with Joe Biden....


Sep 17, 2018, 11:46 AM

:)

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agree with Prod, except


Sep 17, 2018, 11:10 AM [ in reply to These situations are difficult... ]

there has been plenty of time to investigate. Dems have been holding on to this till the last minute...simply to delay/resist!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ginsburg said the theatrics and vitriol


Sep 17, 2018, 11:08 AM

coming from the dems was pathetic.....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep, dirty as heck, the same as not bringing up


Sep 17, 2018, 12:03 PM

Garland for vote.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Except one of them accuses a man of sexual assault.***


Sep 17, 2018, 12:30 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


that was "dirty"? Seems one can claim...


Sep 17, 2018, 12:33 PM [ in reply to Yep, dirty as heck, the same as not bringing up ]

playing politics with the nomination, etc...but it wasn't "dirty".

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That wasn't dirty. Go look up the "Biden Rule".***


Sep 17, 2018, 1:46 PM [ in reply to Yep, dirty as heck, the same as not bringing up ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

https://as1.ftcdn.net/v2/jpg/00/81/16/28/1000_F_81162810_8TlZDomtVuVGlyqWL2I4HA7Wlqw7cr5a.jpg


Kavanaugh should be presumed innocent unless proven


Sep 17, 2018, 11:56 AM

otherwise.

Dr. Ford should also be presumed innocent of lying, unless proven otherwise.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How exactly would this ruin her life?


Sep 17, 2018, 1:01 PM

She may not be at Stanford today but she'll be getting a huge promotion soon.

Whether its in academia or the speaking circuit she will be paid for this.

No one in her neck of the woods will do anything but praise her for her actions.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ha. I was just about to make the same point. She is in


Sep 17, 2018, 3:13 PM

Academia in California. This won’t ruin her anything.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Oh yes, her future is assured.***


Sep 19, 2018, 4:25 PM [ in reply to How exactly would this ruin her life? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

‘Ruin her life’. LoL***


Sep 19, 2018, 8:24 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 68
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic