|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
Legend [19590]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16894
Joined: 9/5/02
|
I had a Coot tell me that we "slow-played" Bryan Edwards
Jan 10, 2019, 9:35 AM
|
|
in recruiting so that he felt disrespected by the Tigers.
I thought it was simply that we offered him as a Safety and he wanted to play WR, not that we pushed him to USuC?
Not that it really matters, but which is it?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [40098]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18284
Joined: 10/28/15
|
Who?***
Jan 10, 2019, 9:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10822]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9006
Joined: 12/8/02
|
the guy that drops the ball 3 times a game?
Jan 10, 2019, 9:37 AM
|
|
cool, hook em.
Somebody should go post on FGF and tell them that they were so right and we were wrong. They most definitely had the best WR's in the country this year. We will try to work harder and get on their level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2217]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3280
Joined: 3/7/12
|
You’re correct
Jan 10, 2019, 9:39 AM
|
|
He didn’t have a WR offer from Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10460]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7014
Joined: 5/14/01
|
We wanted him as a safety***
Jan 10, 2019, 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [715]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1008
Joined: 4/11/10
|
Re: Safety? I thought TE
Jan 10, 2019, 10:34 AM
|
|
I could be wrong, but I'm prettty sure we offered B. Edwards as a TE. Dak Joyner was a QB that I believe was offer d as a safety, but he was set on playing QB at the collegiate level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: Safety? I thought TE
Jan 10, 2019, 11:01 AM
|
|
They were both offered as safeties
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16416]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14902
Joined: 1/26/99
|
How did we even win a game without him?
Jan 10, 2019, 10:59 AM
|
|
Let alone 15 this year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10121]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4858
Joined: 12/11/12
|
Re: How did we even win a game without him?
Jan 10, 2019, 11:02 AM
|
|
Yes - hard to fathom!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27178]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16025
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: LOL, to the contrary, staff was always upfront with him
Jan 10, 2019, 11:01 AM
|
|
and told him we saw him at safety, not WR.
It's typical coot delusion to think otherwise. We never wanted him at WR, that was clear from the get-go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
That is categorically false !!!!
Jan 24, 2022, 4:31 PM
|
|
From the very beginning, the staff was completely honest and upfront with Edwards telling him that they wanted him as a safety and not as a WR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2563]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4860
Joined: 10/2/08
|
That's what you get for talking with a coot.. Just tell them
Jan 10, 2019, 12:26 PM
|
|
Pay them , tell them thanks , and take your pizza.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 155
Joined: 1/8/16
|
Re: That's what you get for talking with a coot.. Just tell them
Jan 15, 2019, 4:38 PM
|
|
This is classic. Love it. Go Tigers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: I had a Coot tell me that we "slow-played" Bryan Edwards
Jan 15, 2019, 5:27 PM
|
|
So we did Edwards a favor by not offering him as a WR? Otherwise, he would not have received much PT at CLEMSON. He should be thankful that UofSuc is happy with him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5280]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6926
Joined: 11/5/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42928
Joined: 11/30/98
|
dang, then beat us again on the recootin trail***
Jan 15, 2019, 6:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
