Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
I get the concern regarding Putnam, but not with Crouch
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 3
| visibility 151

I get the concern regarding Putnam, but not with Crouch


Dec 16, 2018, 10:01 PM

Crouch was more than likely gonna play defense for us as a linebacker. We have 5 linebackers committed, including three 4 stars. People need to chill regarding him. Now with Putnam, I completely understand the concern. The fact that we're more than likely going to have only 3 O-line signings over two classes is very concerning.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I get the concern regarding Putnam, but not with Crouch


Dec 16, 2018, 10:10 PM

Putnam would be the bigger loss but Crouch is still a 5 star talent and you can never have too many of them. Our Lb 2 deep should be considerable more athletic next season which is encouraging. We've had guys that have played well but our linebackers have been on the whole kind of surprisingly unathletic for a while.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Crouch just might be too versatile to deny RB touches ...


Dec 16, 2018, 11:30 PM

It will work out with time, but this relationship is a win-win for Crouch & Clemson.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You don't know how Crouch will (or won't) develop


Dec 16, 2018, 11:44 PM

over the next few years. Look what occurred with Vic Beasley.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 3
| visibility 151
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic