Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
FB Update: ESPN analysts pick their Top 5 in CFB
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 13
| visibility 1

FB Update: ESPN analysts pick their Top 5 in CFB


Nov 13, 2016, 9:35 AM

 
ESPN analysts pick their Top 5 in CFB

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: ESPN analysts pick their Top 5 in CFB


Nov 13, 2016, 9:39 AM

I like Danny Kannel but to put Louisville at 2 and Oklahoma at 5 is whack-a-doodle... Joey Galloway's top 5 is about right.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: ESPN analysts pick their Top 5 in CFB


Nov 13, 2016, 9:44 AM

Kannel had his Lamar Jackson blend coffee this morning. That's pathetic really

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So let me get this straight a loss to Clemson is more


Nov 13, 2016, 10:04 AM

impressive than a win over Louisville. So lets put Louisville ahead of Clemson because they lost to a more impressive team than Clemson beat?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Just to play Devil's Advocate


Nov 13, 2016, 10:25 AM

While I agree with you, I'll take an open-minded stab at the thought behind it.

Each team has one loss. Which loss was better? I can see the argument that Louisville's loss to Clemson is a better loss than Clemson's loss to Pitt. They were both lost in about the same fashion, but Clemson is a better team to lose to than Pitt. So, that would be the argument as it pertains to the quality of their losses.

The other side of the argument comes in the win column. They both have the same amount of wins. The quality of opponents that Clemson has beaten is much higher than Louisville's. There's no arguing that. What Louisville does have going for them is that their average win was never even close. Clemson definitely can't say the same thing.

The real issue is the fact that the two teams had a head-to-head matchup. Clemson obviously won that. But, to be rational, They wouldn't win 100 out of 100. So, there's room to say that the loser of the game isn't always the inferior team and vice versa. Any other logic is just Coot logic. Pitt beat us. Does that mean they are the better team? Sure, they were yesterday. But, no, they are NOT the better team. If that were the case, then whoever beat them is also better than we are. That line of logic could go on forever with every team in the nation ending up better than us.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


It makes perfect sense if you just finished smoking crack.


Nov 13, 2016, 10:37 AM [ in reply to So let me get this straight a loss to Clemson is more ]

Clemson beating Louisville isn't as impressive as Louisville losing to Clemson.

Stop the world, I want to get off now.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's pronounced "L Heff A" and it means "The Boss".


Re: So let me get this straight a loss to Clemson is more


Nov 13, 2016, 12:18 PM [ in reply to So let me get this straight a loss to Clemson is more ]

I simply do not get any of this, 3 of the top four lose and it goes wacho. I get moving OSU into the top 4 but not 2nd. Look they lost to PSU, but (coot logic) PSU lost to Pitt. No seriously, the only one I see dropping out is Wash. and moving OSU to 4. Louisville does not deserve to jump anyone and Mich and CU deserve to stay. JMO

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Geez, this line ....


Nov 13, 2016, 10:03 AM

"Pittsburgh's 43-42 win over Clemson was the biggest upset over a top four opponent in the CFB era ..."

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

that's not even accurate***


Nov 13, 2016, 11:16 AM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Unless they literally means while the CFPC rankings are used


Nov 13, 2016, 11:41 AM [ in reply to Geez, this line .... ]

That's not even close:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Alabama+Ole+Miss+2015&oq=Alabama+Ole+Miss+2015&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3j69i61j69i59.3414j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Oops, searched wrong year


Nov 13, 2016, 11:42 AM

Bama was third when they lost to Ole Miss

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


greg McElroy came to Clemson for the 1st time 2 weeks ago


Nov 13, 2016, 10:57 AM

and it made a difference. I think he is spot on.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


is that the same nate silver that kept saying


Nov 13, 2016, 3:12 PM

clinton would beat trump?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What if, Clemson played.....


Nov 14, 2016, 10:16 AM

Louisville for the NC, wow!!



#21

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 13
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic