|
after the ACC collapse,safe to say we aren't hosting, right?
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
Asst Coach [747]
TigerPulse: 35%
Posts: 1424
Joined: 8/2/03
|
after the ACC collapse,safe to say we aren't hosting, right?
May 26, 2013, 6:36 PM
|
|
does that mean we land in Columbia again in the regional?
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [263]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 336
Joined: 11/6/05
|
Oh, I don't know. We may end up being a 2 seed in
May 26, 2013, 6:42 PM
|
|
our own regional because of the way we draw. Are they really going to give one the Big East that drew about 50 to their championship game? The NCAA wants money. And attendance gives them that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1823]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2030
Joined: 10/9/03
|
All the more reason SCAR would host over us
May 26, 2013, 6:44 PM
|
|
their stadium is bigger
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [49613]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30357
Joined: 12/10/98
|
There's always the "No. 1 seed someplace else" ...
May 26, 2013, 6:44 PM
|
|
I'm still betting VTech will be a 1 at some place like K State or So. Alabama. We might draw the same deal.
It doesn't make sense for a school with our facilities and willingness to lay out the guarantee, but there it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [263]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 336
Joined: 11/6/05
|
I assure you we will not be a one seed. Period.
May 26, 2013, 7:18 PM
|
|
We will be a 2 at our place. But then all you have to do is win. Just win baby. And I'm just guessing on the 2 seed at our place. I don't have any inside knowledge. Well, not really anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
We need to play at BTF to have any chance of reaching Omaha
May 26, 2013, 7:55 PM
[ in reply to There's always the "No. 1 seed someplace else" ... ] |
|
After the past 5 games it's hard to feel real good about our chances of advancing regardless, but playing in someone else's place is going to make it much tougher, even as a #1 seed in a non-Clemson regional. Give us a #2 seed, but keep us home ... please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [63]
TigerPulse: 28%
Posts: 121
Joined: 9/19/04
|
Re: after the ACC collapse,safe to say we aren't hosting, right?
May 26, 2013, 7:51 PM
|
|
We are projected to host. Will be interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 82
Joined: 6/22/12
|
Bring on SCAR
May 26, 2013, 9:06 PM
|
|
No more appropriate way to rebound than to leave the coots questioning if their lucky run is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7191]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 20374
Joined: 8/18/06
|
Re: after the ACC collapse,safe to say we aren't hosting, right?
May 26, 2013, 9:12 PM
|
|
I would say your assessment would be right up there
along side,say raising the Titanic.
As far as Columbia goes,if it be,it be!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1427]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2450
Joined: 3/19/01
|
Re: after the ACC collapse,safe to say we aren't hosting, right?
May 26, 2013, 9:18 PM
|
|
If we don't host and it is very unlikely, I would like to go to Columbia. I can't believe all of our fans that make excuses for why we can't beat them in football or baseball. If you are a competitor, going to Columbia is something you should relish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Playing in Columbia
May 26, 2013, 9:50 PM
|
|
We've got absolutely nothing to lose and everything to gain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [58]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 143
Joined: 1/10/13
|
yeah it will be more fun to knock USuCk out at home.***
May 27, 2013, 10:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
|
|
|
50
