»
Topic: na'tl % on basketball transfers.. how CU ranks
Replies: 10   Last Post: Apr 16, 2019 11:04 PM by: CM Shack
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 10  

na'tl % on basketball transfers.. how CU ranks

[5]
Posted: Apr 16, 2019 7:15 PM
 

found this gem on another board


There are 353 Division I men's basketball teams. Two hundred and seventy-eight (79) of them, as of Tuesday, April 16, have at least one player publicly considering transfer options for the 2019-20 season.

Jeff Goodman has been tracking all transfers, including mid-season transfers, across college basketball. And as of Tuesday, the list is approaching 650 players, or nearly two players, on average, per team. And while some of those players will opt to return to their teams, it's still a staggering number.

One hundred and eighty-eight teams have at least two players on the transfer list. Ninety-three teams have at least three, 26 teams have at least five, and two teams have at least eight players on the transfer list, led by UMKC with a nation-leading 10 players.

over 40% of players tansfer at least once in their career. with 2 leaving this year, clemson is not an "outlier" on either side of the av.. we are right on it

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Actually if you look at the top transfer schools


Posted: Apr 16, 2019 7:43 PM
 

They are the really small schools. Also you should check. I've seen 2 numbers. One that include 2 yr and 4 yr schools and both

badge-donor-05yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg


Re: Actually if you look at the top transfer schools

[2]
Posted: Apr 16, 2019 7:44 PM
 

goodman's figures do not use 2 year schools. hell, all of them transfer at some point. LOL

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Bringing facts to TNET will get you pilloried

[1]
Posted: Apr 16, 2019 7:57 PM
 

It's an extension of the same principle we see with social media. When every idiot has a voice, about all you really hear are idiots.

I appreciate you bringing some facts to the discussion, however.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Bringing facts to TNET will get you pilloried

[1]
Posted: Apr 16, 2019 8:16 PM
 

These aren't just facts; they are OBJECTIVE facts.

They should always be welcome.

They illustrate the changing landscape in which we live and how much different it is from the good ol' days in which we subjectively think we had so much prominence.

Thanks for posting.


Out of 353 college basketball programs we are average.


Posted: Apr 16, 2019 8:11 PM
 

Hmmm. Is that a good thing?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

How do we compare to other ACC schools?***


Posted: Apr 16, 2019 9:09 PM
 




Thank you for posting this.

[1]
Posted: Apr 16, 2019 10:36 PM
 

Hopefully the posters who continue to state that we lose a lot of players to transfer, or rely too heavily on transfers, will read this.

2019 white level member

Any transfers signing tomorrow?***


Posted: Apr 16, 2019 10:46 PM
 




If possible.. I would say dig deeper into numbers


Posted: Apr 16, 2019 10:49 PM
 

and find out how many of them saw minutes last year, etc....

Not all transfers are equal

2019 orange level member


I agree, on the whole , I would say we have brought in


Posted: Apr 16, 2019 11:04 PM
 

better transfers than we lost


Replies: 10  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
925 people have read this post