|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3134
Joined: 1/8/13
|
Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 22, 2018, 8:30 PM
|
|
One thing the coots haven't really picked up on this year is that Boom is supposed to be a "defensive expert" but their defense is garbage this year. I've heard they have some injuries but even when we're playing our second team they mostly shut out opponents. They've also harped on Boom needing "his guys" but "his guys" are juniors now and his specialty has degraded and offense is very mediocre. When will they start to realize that it's not working? Will it take a harder schedule next year and going 6-6 for them to catch on or will they notice our second team defense and offense is better than their first team?
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [8049]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6808
Joined: 10/16/09
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 22, 2018, 8:34 PM
|
|
Has improved the record but has done little to improve their depth. I don’t see him being there solution, but who would be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [992]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1528
Joined: 10/7/12
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 22, 2018, 8:41 PM
|
|
They will have some talent on both sides of the ball next year, but still have a depth issue. I think some depth will eventually come to SC, but WM has yet to show he is a good game day coach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12864]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8188
Joined: 3/30/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1046]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 1701
Joined: 9/22/01
|
he had better talent at uf
Nov 22, 2018, 8:49 PM
|
|
last year was huge anomaly
as long as he remains in charge of D, they will play these 50-50 games and shuffle around 7-5 records
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2479]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1793
Joined: 12/20/01
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 22, 2018, 8:53 PM
|
|
His year as DC at Auburn before U5C hired him was awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27306]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10102
Joined: 2/14/13
|
The point here is
Nov 22, 2018, 9:52 PM
|
|
This is all the have ever been and all they will ever be. It doesn’t matter progress or regress they stay mediocre and will never be a championship football program. So it’s futile to ask what if or what should they do. They should be happy with MUschump because he the best they will ever get. And they will never be the best. Happy thanksgiving. I’m thankful for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2332]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3530
Joined: 5/7/03
|
Re: The point here is
Nov 22, 2018, 11:25 PM
|
|
Muscrap has done a job which reminds of Tommy Bowden, decent recruiting at the skill positions, but “hit or miss” elsewhere. Coaching wise he, like his Florida tenure, has failed to figure out an offense until this year.
USCe is about to find out just how far they really are behind Clemson and other elite programs like BAMA and higher ones like LSU and Auburn. Muscrap won’t last beyond 2020 at this rate.
Go Tigers ??!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 12:58 AM
|
|
I know he was considered to be a defensive guy, but he absolutely destroyed the Texas defensive unit when he was their DC. He sucked so badly that Texas still has not recovered. And then he went to UF as HC and destroyed that program too. As the DC at AU for 1 year, he knew he would be fired soon as he ruined their D also, so he accepted the USUC HC job after 6-7 other coaches turned them down. He was all USUC could get. So - they might not see it yet, but I would say that the USUC program will not recover for at least 5-10 years due to hiring this clown. Only a miracle (and the fact NOBODY else will take the job) can save him from being fired at USUC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 9:35 AM
|
|
It always amazes me people can let their fan bias ignore reality.
Texas was 53rd in total defense the year before he got there. When he left they had back to back top 5 seasons.
Yeah he destroyed he UF program so badly he left them back to back SEC titles gift wrapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3290]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4049
Joined: 1/3/14
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 10:17 AM
|
|
Don't you mean 2 SEC Least titles? Seems like someone else won the Championship Game.
Message was edited by: djones73
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 12:00 PM
|
|
Correct. I meant to type east in there but left it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1852]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1876
Joined: 2/1/18
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 11:05 AM
[ in reply to Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression? ] |
|
Ya sorry our fan base is so bias. You are absolutely right Muschamp is a good coach and a great recruiter and defensive mind.
I mean this year y’all probably only lose by 40 with players Clemson didn’t offer at the positions they play for your team. A 40 point loss definitely shows improvement.
Also remember when you said it was fan bias when we told you Bentley stunk. Turns out we were right and he would be behind Brice as a junior lol. I won’t bring up your WR who are great but just can’t catch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 12:00 PM
|
|
Also remember when you said it was fan bias when we told you Bentley stunk. Turns out we were right and he would be behind Brice as a junior lol.
Talk about a perfect example of fan delusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3053]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 3545
Joined: 11/24/17
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 7:22 AM
|
|
I think Muschamp will do about as well as anyone could do at SC. That fanbase is hoping for Spurrier-like sucess. That was just an anomaly to what they really are, which is a 7 or 8 win team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12505]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10500
Joined: 1/14/11
|
Love how them cheating is "an anomaly"
Nov 23, 2018, 10:56 AM
|
|
They had a few decent years but literally paid to get them and got caught and were on probation. I guess we just pretend Whitneygate and the Rock Hill boosters just never happened?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40927]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42944
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I think he is doing a great job
Nov 23, 2018, 9:43 AM
|
|
winning seasons at usuc means above average. Remember before Spurrier they were below .500 all time
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1907]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 3154
Joined: 11/11/17
|
Re: Muschamp Progression or Regression?
Nov 23, 2018, 11:44 AM
|
|
In truth it does not matter a whit, the Coots needed to make hay while the SEC East was a dumster fire. Seems they could only manage to somehow be worse than said dumpster fire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
