»
Topic: eSECpn distributes $31.2 million to each school.
Replies: 21   Last Post: May 30, 2015 7:29 AM by: hartins®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 21  

eSECpn distributes $31.2 million to each school.

[1]
Posted: May 29, 2015 3:15 PM
 

At some point you really have to think there will be some sort of backlash against the SEC and ESPN. I suspect it will come in the form of a lawsuit by the players against the conference. They get used, abused and excused. Some receive some sort of crappy degree if they are lucky. Will be fun to watch.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

And how much are we getting back or will get back from the


Posted: May 29, 2015 3:18 PM
 

ACC?

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

I estimate about $20 mil.


Posted: May 29, 2015 3:24 PM
 

We don't have a shameless TV network playing a propaganda horn for us though.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

It still puts us in a hole to teams like USuC, Vandy, and UK.


Posted: May 29, 2015 3:29 PM
 

I hate it. The ACC needs to get off its butt and fix this thing by creating a good network-NOT RAYCOM.


Message was edited by: AThomas®


2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

nm

[1]
Posted: May 29, 2015 4:02 PM
 

nm


Message was edited by: tigrjm76®


2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Nepotism is a #####


Posted: May 29, 2015 4:05 PM
 

nm


Re: It still puts us in a hole to teams like USuC, Vandy, and UK.


Posted: May 29, 2015 4:14 PM
 

Yeah boy. We see how much it has helped usuck lol

2019 student level member

11.2 million more than we make can fund a lot of smaller


Posted: May 29, 2015 4:15 PM
 

sports. It is not comfortable at all.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Get back to us once this year's ACC numbers are are released


Posted: May 29, 2015 4:40 PM
 

Right now , you're just whining on in thread after thread comparing the SEC's current numbers with the ACC's LAST year numbers.


Thank you. Do you think our numbers will come close to this?***


Posted: May 29, 2015 4:43 PM
 

null


Message was edited by: AThomas®


2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

It'll be above last year's numbers(playoff money),


Posted: May 29, 2015 4:48 PM
 

but lower than what the SEC got this year. One thing being forgotten in all the hoopla, isn't this about 10 mil less than what the projections were for the SEC this time last year ? The ACC NEEDS a network. More money to be made during Baseball and Basketball seasons with conference networks.


Re: It'll be above last year's numbers(playoff money),


Posted: May 29, 2015 7:22 PM
 

The SEC wasn't suppose to see a big gain for 2-3 years from their network. They are way ahead of where they thought they would be. The ACC needs ESPN and a network. Don't do it like the PAC 12 on your own. Partner up.


WRONG, this tiome last year they were throwing out $40 -$50.


Posted: May 30, 2015 2:42 AM
 

Typical Coot, no memory and changing the story once expectations are not met.


Re: WRONG, this tiome last year they were throwing out $40 -$50.


Posted: May 30, 2015 6:52 AM
 

Exactly...the SEC said the network would generate way more money. I believe I put together a model that had them at 35 and the ACC at 32 with a network. People are seeing these big numbers and screaming network but remember the playoff money was also a big jump compared to BCS funds. I believe that number actually doubled so that is a large reason why everyone's revenues are growing.

null


You don't have all the information.


Posted: May 30, 2015 12:06 AM
 

You're thinking in terms of football money only. In reality, when you consider all sports, the ACC pulls in more than the SEC. In 2014, the ACC was 2nd and made $305 million in total revenue. The SEC was 4th with $271 million. Stop worrying about nothing.


Re: It still puts us in a hole to teams like USuC, Vandy, and UK.


Posted: May 29, 2015 8:20 PM
 

I believe ESPN owns all ACC TV rights. ESPN sells games to other networks like FOX and Raycom.


Re: It still puts us in a hole to teams like USuC, Vandy, and UK.


Posted: May 29, 2015 11:06 PM
 

www.wedonthaveone.com !!!!!!!!!!!!! swoffy strikes again. he is protecting his son and ray com!!!!!!!!!


I don't understand what you mean by "hole"?


Posted: May 29, 2015 11:56 PM
 

More money? We can build or buy anything they can, and obviously we're succeeding at a higher level. And that's all there is to that.


Re: It still puts us in a hole to teams like USuC, Vandy, and UK.


Posted: May 30, 2015 2:25 AM
 

The problem is every team in the SEC is committed. Whether or not they're good programs is another thing....but even Vandy, UK, Mizzou and SCar are committed to giving time & money to their programs. However the ACC still has Wake, Syracuse, and Pitt...along with a commissioner who's more interested in pushing the Tobacco Road basketball series than he is making the ACC a premier football conference (which was an uphill climb anyway).


Re: eSECpn distributes $31.2 million to each school.


Posted: May 29, 2015 9:48 PM
 

We can't compete with the SEC year in and year out with an $11 million deficit. I really hate being in the ACC, Swoffords got to go!


November ACC vs SEC says hello.***


Posted: May 29, 2015 11:47 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

I've long held the premise that it's a far better thing to

[1]
Posted: May 30, 2015 7:29 AM
 

have a little money and know how to spend it wisely, than to possess great sums and be foolish.

A few teams across the nation come to mind with the former; a great many with the latter.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Replies: 21  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: South Carolina
FOR SALE: Four tickets in Clemson section. Section 506. Face value $125 per ticket.

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
2762 people have read this post