»
Topic: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Replies: 55   Last Post: Jun 10, 2014 5:47 PM by: Tigertricks
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 55  

Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:11 PM
 

I hate when SC fans act like he folded against good teams using SC as the only example. They never acknowledge his performances against LSU, Ohio St., Georgia, Auburn, etc.

But he sucked against carolina. :(


Because, at least one of those years, we had the worst D in

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:17 PM
 

Clemson history.

2019 white level member

How did Charlie go 4-0 against them?***


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:17 PM
 




Re: How did Charlie go 4-0 against them?***


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 1:42 PM
 

Charlie was a great QB. Very poised and had a nice touch on the ball. I don't understand this post really. The man has been a professional QB for several years. Granted he hasn't started much, but he is still a professional.
To answer the initial question regarding Boyd.... He went 0-3 because he just played poorly against them. He got behind in some and tried to force things. Others he was just being crushed by Clowney and crew. Also I think the Gameschmucks QB's just played better, their coaches coached better. Its all a mental thing from my point of view.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

The teams that Charlie beat...


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:21 PM
 

were Noooo where near as good as they are now.


j/s

#21


Why don't you tell us, dirtpecker?***

[4]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:24 PM
 




Found one^^^***


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:26 PM
 



2019 white level member

There were several reasons, depending on which year you're

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:26 PM
 

talking about, but the common factor, in my opinion, was their superiority on both lines.

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


Previous....***


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:28 PM
 



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:30 PM
 

> talking about, but the common factor, in my opinion,
> was their superiority on both lines.

A good answer. Most simpletons here automatically just assume I'm trolling as a cock. But you got to the point I was trying to make.

They lose 3/4 starters on the DLine which has been their main advantage these past few years. The one returning starter is a guy I've never heard of.

Thompson is going to be eating a lot of dirt this time around, I'm really excited about our front 7.


Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:36 PM
 

Only problem w that is their D line won't effect DT eating dirt. The lack of depth and experience will help Cole Stout make plays.

But Lamecocks OLine will be very good this year. So will our D line. It is going to be a battle for sure.

On the contrary out O line may not be amazing an neither is their D.

2019 white level member

Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're

[4]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 7:28 PM
 

USuC did not dominate the offensive or defensive line last year. In fact, Spurrier admitted his self that he kept calling qb draws bc we controlled the line of scrimmage. Also, R McDowell averaged better than 8.5 ypc against them. Two years ago is a different story.

Tajh Boyd is not the best qb in Clemson history. For those who say he his, he's not. Was he the qb with the best receivers and offensive coordinator in Clemson history? Probably. All parties during his tenure, 0-4 against USuC.

It's no simple theory as to how we(tajh) were 0-4 with him as qb. But I firmly believe it is coaching.

Steve Spurrier is a better football coach than Dabo and everybody on this board knows it and hates it, and won't admit it. Would Steve Spurrier have beaten USuC last year if he was the coach at Clemson? Absolutely.

Would Connor Shaw have beaten USuC if he was the qb at Clemson last year? The thought has occurred to me.

Clemson had better players, facilities, and coordinators than USuC the past two years. Getting the players ready to play is the HC job, and simply put they were not, and 6 turnovers is exhibit A.

Turn me down fellas. I'm gonna go have dinner with my smokin hot 24 year old gf and worry about my tiger pulse.


You robbin the cradle like me? lol***


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 11:14 PM
 




Lots of BS in that post...


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 2:01 PM
 

Couple quick points..

Dabo is doing considerably better after 5 years than Sack was 5 years into his 3rd head coaching job.

And, THERE IS NO WAY Sack beats Clemson of his team had 6 turnovers. In fact, if we had a few less and certainly of 6-0 in reverse, then we beat the #### out of the coots.

There's a lot more BS in your post too. We can discuss later if needed.


Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:35 PM
 

The trenches, especially our OL's inability to run-block has been a huge reason we have struggled. We seem to be fixing that in a big way and focusing on the trenches, both OL and DL, and it will pay us big dividends. That has been the missing piece of the puzzle, IMO.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

This was not the case last year, and we still lost***


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:53 PM
 




I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.

[2]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:32 PM
 

-1. Enjoy.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.

[3]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:39 PM
 

> -1. Enjoy.

lmao, you're internet points have no power here. You're welcome to actually join in on some meaningful conversation though.

I think we easily have the upper hand this year, playing at home, and they are very inexperienced along their DLine, something they aren't used to and something that has been very advantageous to them in our games.


Meaningful? "We"?

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 8:35 PM
 

Loser.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:52 PM
 

Do you get a limited number of TDs if you pay? I feel like if you pay, although you obviously should only get to TD a specific post once, you should be able to TD as many posts as you want.


Re: I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 11:00 AM
 

You are another #### loving loser like the OP congrats.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:37 PM
 

SC had their best years in school history during those three years, not just the best three years in a row but the best three years ever.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:06 PM
 

Clemson had their best 3 years as well, that's a wash.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:49 PM
 

Not even close #### lover.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:48 PM
 

IMO - it was COACHING and a whole lot of luck for the chickens. The law of averages finally caught up with us, and even though we are the better team, they managed to pull off 5 upsets. :)

Pretty good - huh?


obvious coot troll is obvious


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 6:56 PM
 

effin loser

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


Fuller was 3-0***

[3]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 7:13 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: Fuller was 3-0***


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 8:23 PM
 

For all you youngsters out there:

1. SteveFuller
2. Homer Jordan
3. Woodrow Dantzler


4. Charlie Whitehurst***

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 8:28 PM
 



2019 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

There's something in these hills.


clowney had him psyched out in last 2 meetings.***


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 8:32 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

Kind of like Tanner/Holbrooke and Jack.***


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 10:38 AM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


Because he wasn't the best one of the best just not the best***

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 8:45 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Whitehurst got drafted 3rd round 81st overall


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 9:32 PM
 

and its a team game.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 9:43 PM
 

Some people don't like to hear it but here goes:

Against a team as talented and well-coached as SC it's hard to sling the ball all over the field. While Tajh had some great games against LSU, OSU, etc, he also had games where he wasn't able to take what the defense gave him when 1) his primary read wasn't available, 2) there wasn't a wide open Sammy/Nuk on a 9 route down the sideline or 3) opposing defenders go physical at the LOS with our WR and threw the timing of the play off.

These weren't always problems for Tajh but they were in the Coot game. Combined with some questionable play calling and the Coots just being able to seal the deal late in the 3rd quarter/early in the 4th quarter (past 3 years), things just didn't work out.


And him running directly into the arms of clowney when he

[1]
Posted: Jun 9, 2014 9:47 PM
 

could of run the other way last year. Him being psyched out by the clown cost us the last 2 games against them.

military_donation.jpg

Re: And him running directly into the arms of clowney when he


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 1:32 PM
 

I wish he would had been patience, felt where the pressure were, stood tall, and kept his eyes scanning down field for what was available at that times. These plays really hurt his draft stock on the big stage games.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 9:56 PM
 

He won some big games but if we had lost the OSU game because of him changing a play when told not to I wonder how people on here would judge him.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Couldve been ugly


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 11:03 AM
 

between that and the late flip pass that was intercepted at the goal line. 2 of the worst INT's of his career.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

He played scared , got intimidated


Posted: Jun 9, 2014 9:55 PM
 

...


Allergy?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 10:36 AM
 

http://www.phadia.com/en/Products/Allergy-testing-products/ImmunoCAP-Allergen-Information/Epidermals-and-Animal-Proteins/Allergens/Chicken-droppings/


That's a great question---I'm glad you asked. The answer is

[1]
Posted: Jun 10, 2014 10:41 AM
 

65–42–4.

2019 orange level member

The real question here


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 10:44 AM
 

Why do you have a clemson related handle? Is you're life so sad that you pretend to be a tiger?

I, as a real fan of my team, would never don a coot nickname, even for trolling purposes.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 10:59 AM
 

Why do you think you are fooling anyone by being a #### lover on a Clemson website?

Why are you too embarrassed by your ###### school to get a real screen name?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


TB was NOT the QB in school history


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 10:59 AM
 

He is however the QB who saw the most snaps in school history and had an O-coord that liked airing it out. And oh by the way, he was throwing to the best WR corps in school history.

TB is a great person and a good QB, but not the best in school history.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Why did your Heisman trophy winning RB never score


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 2:12 PM
 

Against Clemson?

Why did your best 3 season stretch in school history include zero conference championships and zero national championships?

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 2:19 PM
 

Oh the mindless nauseating baiting from one our resident Coot trolls!!

Enjoy your little " 5-peat" Cootie bird!!

We STILL OWN YOU !!!

Go Tigers!!!!

military_donation.jpg

Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 3:05 PM
 

> I hate when SC fans act like he folded against good
> teams using SC as the only example. They never
> acknowledge his performances against LSU, Ohio St.,
> Georgia, Auburn, etc.
>
> But he sucked against carolina. :(

I dunno man, it's a legit question that may go unanswered for a long time.

As long as we still got DabDog we'll still be OK though despite our lack of success for so long against Scar.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 3:10 PM
 

You are a chicken fan.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 3:23 PM
 

> You are a chicken fan.

You have a weird obsession for me, man.

I'm married ......... to a female. Not into that, sorry.


Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:49 PM
 

I think this might be one of Stanleys Scoks.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


He didn't. He went 4-0...


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 3:12 PM
 

His name is Charlie Whitehurst


Not the best QB. Not even close


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:09 PM
 

Woody Dantlzer.

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


He didn't....the team did.***


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:09 PM
 



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

In a nut shell


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:20 PM
 

I think Sc got to the point where they just
wanted it more...finally.
They were more physical
Most of the last 6 years our defense was bad to avg.
Plus Tajh had no real running game to support him.

Just my opinion.
#21


Because 1st and 35.***


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 4:51 PM
 




#### cuinthemorning


Posted: Jun 10, 2014 5:47 PM
 

When I commented last night your pulse was above 70% brah.
What happened lil buddy?

Ps

Don't ####### tell me it's 4:45 at 4:38. IT'S NOT


Replies: 55  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: ACC Championship
FOR SALE: 1 ticket Section 132 Row 14 Seat 13 $60 Had a friend bail. Pay with Venmo or Paypal friend to...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
5180 people have read this post