Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Why aren't we talking about Vic?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 5
| visibility 1

Why aren't we talking about Vic?


Sep 29, 2014, 10:37 AM

Everyone and their mother knew what this kid was capable of before the season. It was almost a foregone conclusion that his numbers would not only decline, but possibly significantly decline as other players got more opportunities at the QB.

The kid is on pace to possibly have a better season than last year statistically, while being chipped with a TE, blocked with a RB, or held on just about every single play.

Not only is Vic going to break the sack record (possibly this week), he may set a record that we don't see broken in a long, long, time, if ever. I'm so impressed with his work ethic and drive, and it's safe to say that his seemingly outlandish claim of being better than Clowney may prove to be right.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Vic playing well is like Jarett playing well, it's expected


Sep 29, 2014, 10:46 AM

I never thought his numbers would go down too much simply because it's hard to double team him with the rest of our DL there. Grady demands a double team our else his going to abuse the OG or Center that's put on him.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

All I hear is how Vic is good but


Sep 29, 2014, 10:55 AM

Clowney "changed opponents gameplans" which was worth as much as sacks or tackles etc. That he "took away a side of the field". All I know is, if folks are not game planning around #3 they're making a mistake. Beasley is as good or better than Clowney. All he lacks is a game changing highlight tackle in a bowl game that gets WAY more attention than it deserves.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why aren't we talking about Vic?


Sep 29, 2014, 11:04 AM

Yeah...he is playing lights out but I do have a remark about his play. I have noticed on watching the replays that he makes a lot of sacks but I swear, it looks as though he is just content with that part of it. It appears to me that he is on the QB so quickly, before they even realize it, that he has had several opportunities to knock/jar the ball loose from their hands but doesn't even seem to try to do it.

He reminds me a lot of the old school LT with his pass rush (no I am not saying he is as good as LT). The thing about LT is that he was always chopping down on the QB's throwing arm trying to jar the ball loose. Just something I think is there for the taking for him.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm assuming that if he tried to do just that


Sep 29, 2014, 11:38 AM

We would see you on here complaining that he tries to be too fancy when he should be trying to get sacks.

You are upset because our pass-rush specialist is too concerned with sacking the QB?

Good Lord.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm assuming that if he tried to do just that


Sep 29, 2014, 12:15 PM

Upset? Yeah, I am livid, been thinking about it all weekend. Just something I noticed on the replay but carry on! Great deductive reasoning and logic skills by the way!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 5
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

I feel as though I owe each of you an explanation....

by BengalBen®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic