|
Replies: 26
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1708]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 1374
Joined: 1/10/11
|
Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle?
Aug 11, 2013, 7:18 AM
|
|
The only truly explosive o they faced that I know of was vs Boise st and Oklahoma st.They didnt do very well.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [111431]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73692
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle?
Aug 11, 2013, 9:44 AM
|
|
their new DC has seen nothing like this. Had they played ATM last year, I doubt they make the SEC championship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11/19/11
|
3 years doesn't exactly qualify as "new"
Aug 11, 2013, 10:52 AM
|
|
I think the weak link will be the number of defensive players that are unfamiliar with no-huddle more than Grantham's ability to coach them. He built a pretty solid defense at VT and was relatively well respected in the NFL for most of his teams (maybe not the Browns....but, well they are the Browns).
Experience and reads count as much as skill in quick play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Re: Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle?
Aug 11, 2013, 10:19 AM
|
|
Last year Mizzou and Nebraska.
Both teams' fanbases were convinced that UGA had never seen anything like their offenses, and that they'd win going away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2455]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5725
Joined: 12/27/05
|
Missouri was pretty awful, Nebraska = one dimensional
Aug 11, 2013, 10:39 AM
|
|
Hard to make much of a comparison in either case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31279
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Missou went 5-7 and lost to Syracuse. Nebraska gave up 63
Aug 11, 2013, 10:47 AM
|
|
to Ohio State and 70 to Wisconsin. Wisconsin? Wow!
Not sure why anyone would use those teams to make a point about Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Was just answering a simple question.
Aug 11, 2013, 10:54 AM
|
|
OP wanted to know which teams ran a no huddle recently against UGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11/19/11
|
It's a valid question but players matter most, and...
Aug 11, 2013, 11:05 AM
|
|
...this UGA defense will not be experienced at quick offenses regardless of the past. They may have the playbook down pat. And they may be pretty well coached by Grantham and his staff. But, it's a good bet our experience offense will be able to out maneuver them enough and take advantage of missed reads. They only need to make a few mistakes here and there for Boyd to make his move.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Re: Was just answering a simple question.
Aug 11, 2013, 12:09 PM
|
|
> Yes you did. Thanks.
>
> It won't be a novel offense to them.
I would say that the speed might not be novel, but some of the execution of the spread concepts will be. Say for instance Clemson utilizes motion well to occupy backside pursuit when they sweep Sammy around pre snap then read option the front side. I like the way that play (and the variants) is designed, and Sammy's speed makes it especially effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4745]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8641
Joined: 2/7/02
|
Clemson's offense is much different than what you saw
Aug 11, 2013, 10:42 AM
[ in reply to Re: Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle? ] |
|
versus Missouri and Nebraska. Missouri's offensive skill players are few and their overall offensive production all year was terrible, so their no huddle is no benefit to their game. I can't imagine any Missouri fans bragging about their poor team with a straight face. Their total offense ranked 96th nationally out of 120 teams last year, with less than 360 yards per game..
BTW, Nebraska ran over 70 plays and had 443 total yards on your defense, with a less than stellar passing game.
Their total offense ranked 23rd in the country last season.
Clemson's offense ranked 9th last year, with over 510 yards per game.
See below
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2012&rpt=IA_teamtotoff&site=org&div=IA&dest=O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Re: Clemson's offense is much different than what you saw
Aug 11, 2013, 10:53 AM
|
|
Mizzou's fanbase was bragging before the season and if you remember, UGA vs. Mizzou was the Tigers first conference game. They were all hyped up and convinced that their spread attack would run circles around defenses in the SEC. They changed their tune throughout the season.
Also, the Nebraska offense averaged 6.20 yards per play while the Clemson offense averaged 6.28 yards per play. Not much difference there.
That being said, the Clemson O will probably get as many or more total yards as Neb on 8/31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2066]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3346
Joined: 12/28/02
|
You're an ignorant sob aren't you?
Aug 11, 2013, 11:57 AM
|
|
We are not Neb or Mizzou and for you to think we are you're a total idiot. We sport the best OC in the nation for a reason you pos.
THUGA is going to get their arrses ripped and humiliated.
That is all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
No need to name call
Aug 11, 2013, 11:59 AM
|
|
It's ok to have differing opinions.
And I never said Clemson was the same as Neb and Mizzou. They aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2066]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3346
Joined: 12/28/02
|
Re: No need to name call
Aug 11, 2013, 12:03 PM
|
|
Well Ive read enough of your misguided trash over here. Your act is old loser
Take a hike
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
Thanks for the hospitality.***
Aug 11, 2013, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2066]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3346
Joined: 12/28/02
|
You're welcome! Beat it mutt!***
Aug 11, 2013, 12:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3233]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 4960
Joined: 11/3/06
|
Sorry so_com. These guys are a bit touchy.
Aug 11, 2013, 7:18 PM
[ in reply to Thanks for the hospitality.*** ] |
|
I think the game against you guys is going to be determined by who can stop the run. Even though we're known for our receivers a lot of our offense is predicated on the run. If you guys establish a running game not only will you keep our O off of the field, but it'll get your play-action game going. If that happens I hope our secondary has the discipline to not get fooled by it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
It's cool.
Aug 11, 2013, 9:34 PM
|
|
I got 99 problems, but internet beef ain't one.
As for the game, it will be fun to watch it play out. Can't wait!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2111]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 3057
Joined: 6/19/10
|
Re: Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle?
Aug 11, 2013, 11:41 AM
[ in reply to Re: Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle? ] |
|
Missouri was up by 8 in the 3rd quarter and Nebraska was tied at the end of the 3rd. Georgia win the 4th quarter handily in both games but neither team had near the weapons Clemson has on offense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
UGA has done a good job in the third and fourth quarters
Aug 11, 2013, 11:53 AM
|
|
Since changing the S&C staff a few years ago. Nice to see it paying off by taking control of games late.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [358]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 773
Joined: 4/29/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4896]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5278
Joined: 8/24/11
|
Very good post and point
Aug 11, 2013, 10:52 AM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [790]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2312
Joined: 9/1/05
|
Butt sniffers #### gonna be dragging after this game!
Aug 11, 2013, 2:28 PM
|
|
Goooooooooo Tigersssssss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [30]
TigerPulse: 43%
Posts: 56
Joined: 8/1/13
|
Re: Who has Uga faced in the past couple years vs no huddle?
Aug 11, 2013, 3:49 PM
|
|
Most Gamecock fans want Ga to beat you. Not me. Not for any special love but I want them down for the next game and trust me they will be. Looking at five stright losses to the state across the Savanah, a state they dominated for the whole 20th century, is something they can't handle.
I think it will come down to the Ga. defense; can they stop the Clemson rush and make the Tigers one dimensional? If so, a long night for Tajh, if not, they will be looking at five in a row to the Palmetto state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Neither team is going....
Aug 11, 2013, 7:38 PM
|
|
dominate this game. Just not going to happen.
For Mutt fans to think they are going to bring that "SEC" hype in and thrash us is idiocy.
For we Clemson fans to think it will be easy, that is naive.
Obviously what I would LIKE to see happen is for Clemson to win by 20+.
I do however want to get across to the arrogant "SEC" hosers, that their mighty "Jawja" team is not going to be playing Savannah Valley State Tech!
We are CLEMSON!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [16]
TigerPulse: 8%
Posts: 253
Joined: 7/5/13
|
Re: Neither team is going....
Aug 11, 2013, 9:17 PM
|
|
Well most Georgia fans know that we are not going to come there and dominate Clemson,we are worried about your passing game because of our youth in the secondary. And I'll say this,Georgia has respect for your team! No matter what the fans think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
