Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
We lost a spot in bracket matrix...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 2
| visibility 1,025

We lost a spot in bracket matrix...


Mar 17, 2019, 9:42 AM

NC State too.

So is our main hope that the committee looks how bad the NET ratings are for St Johns and Az State??

http://www.bracketmatrix.com
flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah cause according to that bracket, we have to move


Mar 17, 2019, 9:51 AM

up 2 spots cause there is no way we jump N. C. State.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What's interesting to me is that a precedent is going to be


Mar 17, 2019, 9:55 AM

set here either way, due to the new metrics.

You have Clemson with a NET of 35. Then you have the following, and their NET:

TCU- 52
Ohio St.-- 55
Temple-- 56
AZST- 63
St. Johns-- 72

There is also the "Quad 1 issue", which is not all of those games are equal. For example, 7 of Clemson's Quad 1 losses came against top 21 teams in NET. Our loss to Syracuse was a Q1 loss, but the win was not a Q1 win.

Our NET is a reflection of that aspect, IMO. If we are left out for any of those above, the committee is clearly saying that NET is not that important, and they are giving a win vs. #5 the same weight as a win at #75.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 2
| visibility 1,025
Popular Board Posts
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...129 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic