Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Clemson #27 in latest US News ranking of Public Universities
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 9
| visibility 1

Clemson #27 in latest US News ranking of Public Universities


Sep 9, 2019, 11:15 AM

tied with Texas A&M and Minnesota

https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/top-public

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Clemson #27 in latest US News ranking of Public Universities


Sep 9, 2019, 11:47 AM

#70 overall. Bit of a drop.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So we're ranked below UGA and FSU? I guess when it comes


Sep 9, 2019, 11:56 AM

to academics, "best" really isn't the standard.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Aspiring member of the TigerNet Sewer Dwellers


UGA has always been ranked ahead of Clemson


Sep 9, 2019, 12:52 PM

their avg SAT Vandy, UF and UGA are the only SEC schools that have been. (of course Vandy is private). FSU makes no sense- they were last in the league until UL joined so not sure where that sudden rise is coming from. VT is higher than usual also.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Clemson #27 in latest US News ranking of Public Universities


Sep 9, 2019, 11:58 AM

Who cares? How are these things rated anyway? $$$$ follow the money.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Clemson #27 in latest US News ranking of Public Universities


Sep 9, 2019, 12:45 PM

It's a stupid ranking system which should be obvious because UGa and FSU ranked so high.

35% of the ranking is the retention and graduation rate, so crappy schools get higher ranking because they are easy.

Outcomes (35%)

More than one-third of a school's rank comes from its success at retaining and graduating students within 150% of normal time (six years). It receives the highest weight in our rankings because degree completion is necessary to receive the full benefits of undergraduate study from employers and graduate schools. We approach outcomes from angles of graduation and retention (22%), graduation rate performance (8%) and social mobility (5%).

Only 10% is the quality of the students.

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/how-us-news-calculated-the-rankings

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm glad Clemson got away from the pointless drive


Sep 9, 2019, 1:00 PM

To be top 20 that was a big thing when I was a student (09-13).

Enrollment numbers are up, money is up, morale is at an all time high, the national footprint is huge and it's not all because of football.

Clemson is in a much better spot now than a decade ago when we were arbitrarily making it harder to get into and good in state students were turned away as we strived be "top 20" which nobody cared about. Enrollment was at low as 18,000 at one point when I was at Clemson. The university is much healthier now

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Actually, admission stats are much, much higher than 10 yrs


Sep 9, 2019, 3:13 PM

ago. It's more difficult to gain regular freshman admission than previously. Agree $$ are up due to higher overall enrollments, but there are costs, in more areas than dollars, associated with increased enrollment. I think we are approaching a fine line if we want to maintain the uniqueness and flexibility we've enjoyed as a relatively smaller state university. Going large, and excelling as a high quality university, is a rat race we can't win against schools in much larger states. Historically, we have had competitive advantages, other than size, as we threaded a line between big school amenities with the intimate feel of a smaller school. I hope we don't lose that niche.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm glad Clemson got away from the pointless drive


Sep 13, 2019, 11:12 AM [ in reply to I'm glad Clemson got away from the pointless drive ]

I was there '06 through '12 (hey two degrees)

I remember undergraduate being 14k and grads being 3k with 17K total...

We should be top 20. Period. I am a Barker vision loyalist.

How in the F is FSU even ranked?

Wait: "Since fiscal year 2013-14, FSU has received $61.9 million in preeminence funding from the state, in addition to performance funding."

He, SC legislature - pay our champs!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Clemson #27 in latest US News ranking of Public Universities


Sep 13, 2019, 10:59 AM

FSU is a bunch of clowns for this

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

~Wigwedge~


Replies: 9
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic