Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
How many of the current Top10 college football.............
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 40
| visibility 1

How many of the current Top10 college football.............


Nov 29, 2012, 12:54 PM

teams run an offense similar to Chad Morris's?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: How many of the current Top10 college football.............


Nov 29, 2012, 12:55 PM

better question, does a single one suck as bad on defense?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The up tempo offense and bad roster management on d is why


Nov 29, 2012, 12:57 PM

our d sucks so bad

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not true


Nov 29, 2012, 12:59 PM

How bad did the up tempo offense hurt Texas A&M's defense this year?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bad enough for them to give up 22.5 a game to our 24.9 per


Nov 29, 2012, 1:05 PM

game

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Please explain bad roster management?.....


Nov 29, 2012, 12:59 PM [ in reply to The up tempo offense and bad roster management on d is why ]

txs

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well, 5 starters palyed all 92 snaps Saturday for 1.


Nov 29, 2012, 1:03 PM

Our best 2 interior dline players (Williams, Reader) played 45 snaps combined. Steph Anthony and Tony Steward did not play a single snap on defense and we constantly use a freshman safety as a Strongside Linebacker. It's pretty obvious why we wore down. It wasn't conditioning it was bad roster management.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Played** typo sorry***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:03 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What I'm getting at is who did we have to replace them?


Nov 29, 2012, 1:09 PM [ in reply to Well, 5 starters palyed all 92 snaps Saturday for 1. ]

Our defensive numbers were thin.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Deshawn Williams, DJ Reader, and Carlos Watkins***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:11 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

can they cover a receiver?


Nov 29, 2012, 1:15 PM

because that's something we could benefit from.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Not much can be done about losing your 3 top CB's to injury,


Nov 29, 2012, 1:17 PM

but a better pass rush would help make the QB miss some of those open guys.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

were they hurt for the Auburn game?


Nov 29, 2012, 1:21 PM

Because that was the most consistently wide open Clemson opponent I have ever witnessed. If Auburn had a half decent QB, we would have gotten killed in that game.

Coverage actually got better through the year, but that ain't saying much.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


We blew a lot of coverages against Auburn for sure. Our


Nov 29, 2012, 1:24 PM

safeties were seniors and healthy all year and still blew coverages in every single game. That part I have no answer for.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Took a minute to find the stats (link)


Nov 29, 2012, 1:25 PM [ in reply to Deshawn Williams, DJ Reader, and Carlos Watkins*** ]

http://www.clemsontigers.com/fls/28500/pdf/football/2012-13/stats.pdf?SPSID=657769&SPID=103701&DB_LANG=C&DB_OEM_ID=28500

Reader took 22 snaps. His average.
Williams took 29 snaps. His average.
Watkins took 0 snaps. Only 10 snaps in NC State game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Exactly my point. These guys need to play more.***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:26 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You'll see a better rotation next year.....


Nov 29, 2012, 1:30 PM

with some of the freshmen Dline playing minutes.

Maybe the minutes were because of injury or advantage.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I hope you're right. We have a lot of talent not utilized.***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:40 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Instead of playing Watson and Jarrett 60+ snaps each


Nov 29, 2012, 1:14 PM [ in reply to What I'm getting at is who did we have to replace them? ]

they could have used Reader more than 20 and Williams more than 20 and Watkins more than 0. They could have used our 5 star linebackers, on of which is second on the team in tackles, more than 0 snaps. I'm just saying. Maybe we dont look so tired if we split up the PT a little bit better.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That is a contributing factor, in my opinion.***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:00 PM [ in reply to The up tempo offense and bad roster management on d is why ]



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Notre Dame, Oregon, Texas A&M, Florida


Nov 29, 2012, 12:58 PM

just off the top of my head. Those offenses look a little different based on the players on those teams and how they use them but that is the idea behind all of those teams' offenses.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Chad Morris's offense is outstanding...


Nov 29, 2012, 1:13 PM

against unranked teams.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


His QB is outstanding against unranked teams too. Tajh


Nov 29, 2012, 1:16 PM

missed a lot of wide open guys when he did have time to throw. And don't even get me started about that INT he threw up for grabs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

maybe Morris ahould call some more QB keepers...


Nov 29, 2012, 1:19 PM

I understand many were unscripted because of the pressure Saturday, but we were extremely predictable in the second half against FSU.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


We did put 37 on the #2 defense in the country though***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:25 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We did put 37 on the #2 defense in the country though***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:56 PM

Serious question and not meant as a flame at all, but here goes. Do you really think FSU has the second best defense in the country? The two tough teams they played (Florida and Clemson) they allowed 37 points each game. I think FSU's defensive ranking is very misleading because of games against Murray State, Savannah State, South Florida, and an easy ACC slate.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: maybe Morris ahould call some more QB keepers...


Nov 29, 2012, 1:55 PM [ in reply to maybe Morris ahould call some more QB keepers... ]

> I understand many were unscripted because of the
> pressure Saturday, but we were extremely predictable
> in the second half against FSU.

You need to apply for the OC when Morris leaves.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I didn't see an INT thrown up for grabs, I did see him get


Nov 29, 2012, 2:08 PM [ in reply to His QB is outstanding against unranked teams too. Tajh ]

hit as he was throwing though.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

... for me to poop on***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:19 PM [ in reply to Chad Morris's offense is outstanding... ]



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Chad Morris's offense is outstanding...


Nov 29, 2012, 1:53 PM [ in reply to Chad Morris's offense is outstanding... ]

> against unranked teams.

Is your offense any better, prove it.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Venebles and Morris both, have


Nov 29, 2012, 1:28 PM

Indicated a preference not to rotate linemen. IMHO that's a bad idea. Creates fatigue and doesn't develop depth

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We do Chicken right...it's not just for frying anymore!


I agree with you %100. Must rotate lineman. Especially on D.***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:30 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Every D in the Top 10 is light years better than ours


Nov 29, 2012, 1:32 PM

except MAYBE Texas A&M (and theirs is better, maybe not light years, but it is better).

Our Defense, not our Offense, cost us the USuC game (although I admit that I was not crazy about the Offensive gameplan). Can't get off the field on 3rd and a Mile, well, you deserve to lose...

The Offense won us a lot of games this year... have some of you already forgotten 2010 already?????

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And lets not forget Oregon and the 22 per game they give up***


Nov 29, 2012, 1:36 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

True, but their D looked pretty good this year except


Nov 29, 2012, 1:41 PM

for that debacle against USC. Their D is plenty better than ours and plays against better O's throughout the season.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's definitely better but not light years. Who plays O out


Nov 29, 2012, 1:44 PM

west other than Oregon and USC?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm not saying I don't love our offense, I'm saying it puts


Nov 29, 2012, 1:39 PM [ in reply to Every D in the Top 10 is light years better than ours ]

the D at a disadvantage. Even if our Scheme and Depth were as good as Alabama we would not have the defensive numbers they have because while we are running 90 offensice plays our opponent is running 70 or so. Bama's opponents are getting 40 because Bama plays a slow methodical offense that shortens the game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Completely agree and I have believed for some time


Nov 29, 2012, 1:54 PM

that the faster pace offenses will actually result in two things:

1. The better team winning more often, largely because running more plays is going to give the better team more opportunities against the weaker team.

2. More blowouts, largely for the same reason.

I think this goes back to the "shot clock" in basketball. 40 years ago, a team with less talent could stall the game, play keep away, keep the game close and hope to win something ugly like 26-24. As the shot clock came along, creating more possessions, the more skilled team becomes more and more likely to win.

The fast-paced offense is pretty much the same thing in football. A game with 180 plays run will more likely result in the skilled team winning than a game with 125 plays run. That's just common sense.

Also, only one game, ONE GAME, this entire CU season was decided by less than 10 points (the first one, which was 7 points). I don't think this is at all a coincidence. More plays equals more opportunity to separate yourself from competition, and avoid an upset, IF you have more talent.

I would argue that the only teams on our schedule with similar talent are: Auburn, FSU, USuC. So, our offense did what it was designed to do, blow out weaker teams.

And, in our two losses, our defense, not our offense, was the culprit (and our D is where we are talent deficient, especially in the secondary).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bull crap, Im sick of that excuse


Nov 29, 2012, 1:57 PM [ in reply to I'm not saying I don't love our offense, I'm saying it puts ]

Its not like the defense gets tired and starts giving up big plays and points late - its starts right off the bat!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Its not an excuse. Our defense is on the bad side of


Nov 29, 2012, 2:03 PM

mediocre and needs to improve. I was simply saying it won't rank among the top defenses even when it becomes one because it will have to defend more plays and therefore give up more yards and possibly points. I'm pretty sure we led at the half in both our losses this year though and perhaps the lack of rotation on the d line and subsequent lack of pass rush later in games caused a bad secondary to get exposed.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

QB of spread teams that have won the NC - Tebow, Newton


Nov 29, 2012, 2:09 PM

In other words, they had a freak of nature at QB. Both could get tough running yards, just in different ways. I think if I were building an offense/team to win the NC, I'd likely build it to be a little more conventional, but that's not to say that a spread team, minus a freak, won't ever do it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 40
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic