Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 143
| visibility 1

He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:15 PM

You no longer have a defense. You can't argue there wasn't quid pro quo. Sondland has never been anti-Trump. This testimony is huge.

At this point, any defense of this will just look foolish. As if it didn't already.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:19 PM

Yeah it's bad. I don't know how the GOP comes back from this. I know they'll try hard, though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't think they expected this to happen.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:22 PM

It's backed them into a really tough corner now. Expect public support for impeachment to grow, and they're going to have to start weighing their political careers vs. loyalty to Trump.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Nice try. They'll hook onto "Trump said no QPQ"


Nov 20, 2019, 12:22 PM [ in reply to Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks. ]

and won't let go of that. And won't say anything else about any other part of the testimony.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like your funny words magic man


Trump lies so frequently(13 per day and rising) that he has


Nov 20, 2019, 12:35 PM

no credibility. That is the problem that Trump has created for himself and his minions.

Nobody else believes him any more.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trump lies so frequently(13 per day and rising) that he has


Nov 20, 2019, 8:56 PM

Who you calling nobody......Go Tigers!!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It still requires at least minimal GOP defection in the


Nov 20, 2019, 12:22 PM

Senate. I haven't seen any evidence of that happening...yet. They have a lot more to chew on now.

We're going to find out if American politics is truly no longer about right and wrong, and is now fully about winning and losing.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:23 PM

If voters overwhelming support impeachment--like they did Nixon's--they'll have no choice but to turn on him.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


This won’t change the minds of Trump’s base. They worship him.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:31 PM

One of the few truths he has told was that he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and he wouldn’t lose any supporters. Plus, this will be spun in the echo chambers of Fox and Lyon’ Limbaugh, they won’t hear the substance of today’s testimony.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lyin’***


Nov 20, 2019, 12:32 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lyin’***


Nov 20, 2019, 12:32 PM [ in reply to This won’t change the minds of Trump’s base. They worship him. ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: This won’t change the minds of Trump’s base. They worship him.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:17 PM [ in reply to This won’t change the minds of Trump’s base. They worship him. ]

That statement was made in jest with a little overconfidence because he knew his support was real enough to gain him the Presidency. He was right. Nobody took it seriously except dip sharts like you.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Of course it wasn’t made to be taken seriously.


Nov 20, 2019, 7:11 PM

But it’s scarily close to true. The “truth” I was mentioning was the sentiment, “dipshart.” He can do no wrong in his supporters eyes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Of course it wasn’t made to be taken seriously.


Nov 21, 2019, 10:28 AM

Trump says and does things that make me feel a little embarrassed but I just have faith that enough see the wisdom in his policies and objectives to keep him in office. I don't worship him or think he does 'no wrong'. And yes, you are a third rate political commentator.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:40 PM [ in reply to It will come down to public opinion. ]

The voters will never overwhelmingly support impeachment and out of office. Not happening. The Repub will overwhelmingly support Trump. It doesnt matter what we Dems think.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:47 PM

Why not? It happened with Nixon. The public was originally split on it, then they overwhelmingly supported impeachment after the information started coming out. In fact, we are further ahead in support for impeachment than we were with Nixon at this time.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 1:15 PM

Its a different world with different media. There will be absolutely no reason for Repubs to turn on him. Its not happening.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 21, 2019, 10:33 AM [ in reply to Re: It will come down to public opinion. ]

The public supported Nixon's impeachment because of the cover-up, including the 18 (?) minutes of erased Oval Office tapes. Until then he was in the clear.
Nothing in this case even sniffs that air and won't. Let it go.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:19 PM [ in reply to Re: It will come down to public opinion. ]

I don't agree with your politics but at least you have a brain, which is more than I can say for buddies on here.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

YOU SAY THINGS I AGREE WITH THEREFORE YOU ARE


Nov 20, 2019, 5:25 PM

SMART AND THOSE OTHER PEOPLE ARE DUMB.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: YOU SAY THINGS I AGREE WITH THEREFORE YOU ARE


Nov 21, 2019, 10:35 AM

Not exactly sugar plum.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:41 PM [ in reply to It will come down to public opinion. ]

I keep saying this - the Democrats actually don't need 20 Senators to defect publicly.

They just need three who are willing to cross the line and vote for a private vote.

I'll give you Mitt Romney, and potentially Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski...or any of several others who aren't standing again until 2024 - you know, like Ted Cruz, who still owes Trump bigly for basically calling his dad the Second Gunman On The Grassy Knoll.

They do that and the vote is basically 80-20 or even 85-15 to convict if GOP insiders like Jeff Flake are remotely correct.

The thing that keeps sticking in my head is the thought that institutions almost always defend their power. And Senators take the long view anyhow; they think in terms of 6-year cycles.

The ones like Lindsey Graham who are standing in 2020 certainly won't cause a (public) stir, but a private vote is something altogether different.

The Senate has that power. The rules are what the Senate decides they are. And they might just take a look at the public opinion trends and the prospect of losing the Senate in 2020 and decide it's time to remind the President emphatically just how much power the Senate actually does have, if they only decide to exert it....

I dunno. They've been meek up until now...but will they stay that way?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


McConnell will decide they can't have an impeachment hearing


Nov 20, 2019, 12:56 PM

in an election year.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I think Cruz could tip the scales all by himself, the


Nov 20, 2019, 1:11 PM [ in reply to Re: It will come down to public opinion. ]

guy is off the charts brilliant and has the respect of many in the GOP, especially when it comes to constitutional matters. And if his philosophy remains concerning the separation of powers, he would win a lot of arguments with his colleagues that think the contrary.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It will come down to public opinion.


Nov 20, 2019, 11:26 PM [ in reply to Re: It will come down to public opinion. ]

Susan Collins a coward. She'll never do the right thing. She already had that chance and put a rapist on the Supreme Court...

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We are up to 70% think he should be impeached. 51% think


Nov 20, 2019, 12:31 PM [ in reply to It still requires at least minimal GOP defection in the ]

he should be impeached AND removed from office.

As these public hearings move forward and more corroborating and damning testimony emerges and the number who support impeachment AND removal from office grows to 55% and more, it will become politically untenable for them to continue to support the president and get re-elected.

Things are changing rapidly.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We are up to 70% think he should be impeached. 51% think


Nov 20, 2019, 12:43 PM

51% say impeached and out of office. Over 90% of that number are Dems. That 51% is meaningless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You need basically a super-majority in favor of removal***


Nov 20, 2019, 12:51 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It still requires at least minimal GOP defection in the


Nov 20, 2019, 12:58 PM [ in reply to It still requires at least minimal GOP defection in the ]

It all depends on public opinion. People seem to think Republican politicians would never turn on Trump, but they'd throw him under the bus the second he's not valuable to them anymore.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It still requires at least minimal GOP defection in the


Nov 20, 2019, 1:27 PM

Public opinion will just go down party lines. Repubs arent turning on him.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Acquitted


Nov 20, 2019, 2:09 PM [ in reply to It still requires at least minimal GOP defection in the ]

yawn and move on.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


LOL, post-truth America doesn't care about facts.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:24 PM

This is just the beginning.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: LOL, post-truth America doesn't care about facts.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:21 PM

Just the beginning of what? The Dems have shot their wad.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Four times now


Nov 20, 2019, 4:24 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

trump needs to call broken arrow


Nov 21, 2019, 10:38 AM

with the enemy inside the perimeter

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The end of America and Democracy.


Nov 21, 2019, 12:39 PM [ in reply to Re: LOL, post-truth America doesn't care about facts. ]

Once truth and fact no longer matter, there isn't really anything left.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Rudy Rudy Rudy do you love me. Rudy Rudy Rudy do you care?


Nov 20, 2019, 12:30 PM

Someone needs to take a bullet for the Boss.

Regardless the Senate won’t convict.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Rudy Rudy Rudy do you love me. Rudy Rudy Rudy do you care?


Nov 20, 2019, 12:44 PM

Its almost time for Trump to say he hardly knew Rudy and that he never really liked Rudy.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:38 PM

So why does it matter what Sondland says? We all know what Trump did. It was shady. The Repubs in the Senate still wont get on board.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:12 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:24 PM [ in reply to Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks. ]

'What Trump did' wasn't shady at all. Dozens of Obama administration appointees etc., should've been jailed or worse already. Schiff deserves the death penalty without a doubt.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

While Sondland's testimony was certainly pivotal and


Nov 20, 2019, 12:46 PM

solidified the evidence in concrete that he violated his oath of office, we still have to get over the hurdle in the Senate. When will GOP senators understand that the party is better off without Trump? The country, as well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: While Sondland's testimony was certainly pivotal and


Nov 21, 2019, 10:44 AM

Just stop with the juvenile repetition of falsehoods. Trump has absolutely not violated his oath of office, obstructed justice or engaged in a cover-up of either.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over


Nov 20, 2019, 12:50 PM

Doesn't rise to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors," and isn't a big enough deal to have the president removed. And the thing is, as bad as this is, and as good a reason as it is to remove Trump's incompetence, lots of people are so cynical that they can't take this seriously enough as a reason for impeachment. Everything is about partisanship to them, so all allegations of wrongdoing are just cynical parts of the way they think the game of politics is played. To them, it really is a game where you do anything to try to beat the other side, so it's all fine. Whatever.

I'd be fine with Trump being removed at this point, but I just think we're in the midst of a such a cynical, partisan era in politics that it would be impossible to convince enough people to make that happen. If it did happen, it would be seen as illegitimate and partisan.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I believe all of this to be accurate.


Nov 20, 2019, 12:56 PM

Would probably be a different situation/atmosphere if the Mueller investigation never happened. That solidified the idea that Democrats will do anything to remove Trump, and delegitimizes anything that occurs after for a significant segment of voters.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Like the guy who gets a 2nd DUI, The Mueller Report shows


Nov 20, 2019, 1:00 PM

that the Ukraine scheme and obstruction of justice is right in Trump's wheelhouse.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No this is more like the guy that files


Nov 20, 2019, 4:27 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think there is merit in that.


Nov 20, 2019, 1:13 PM [ in reply to I believe all of this to be accurate. ]

There are several clips out there of Dems saying that they MUST impeach Trump...even before he went into office.

Like Tiggity, I think the controlling of who is in office (by either party) by impeachment is a larger threat to the US than Donald Trump ever could be.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And the Kavanaugh hearings


Nov 20, 2019, 1:57 PM [ in reply to I believe all of this to be accurate. ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And that is an easy package to sell his constituents.


Nov 20, 2019, 1:03 PM [ in reply to The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over ]

Objectively, it IS as bad as it sounds and a right reason to remove him from office. Extorting a weak, emerging country with congressionally approved military aid for personal, political gain is absolutely a violation of the office. Even Nixon didn't go so far as to involve foreign governments in his paranoid psychosis.

I think the only way to get through to voters will be if some Republicans defect and add weight to the already credible evidence.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What credible evidence is that?


Nov 20, 2019, 2:01 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So every single foreign policy expert/advisor involved,


Nov 20, 2019, 2:08 PM

even the ones who have first hand knowledge are wrong and Trump is right?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not one has provided any conclusive evidence


Nov 20, 2019, 2:28 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've heard nothing but a lot of "I feel/felt"


Nov 20, 2019, 2:35 PM [ in reply to So every single foreign policy expert/advisor involved, ]

I "believe/believed".. Feelings aren't evidence of anything. I'm not an all in "Trumpster" by any stretch of the imagination, but these "hearings" are a joke.

They aren't changing the minds of either side. And the people in the middle just see it as politicians grandstanding and not doing anything for the American people.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GO TIGERS!!


Quothe the Sondland


Nov 20, 2019, 3:52 PM

"Giuliani's requests were a quid pro quo" end quote.


Support illegal activity from your President if you like, but it is at the expense of your country.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Quothe the Sondland


Nov 20, 2019, 4:15 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There were good people on both sides....


Nov 20, 2019, 4:26 PM

Your powers of listening, reasoning, and understanding are nonexistent. But your ability to be duped is AMAZING!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: There were good people on both sides....


Nov 20, 2019, 5:35 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: There were good people on both sides....


Nov 20, 2019, 6:03 PM

Apologies if you were offended. It was more of an observation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over


Nov 20, 2019, 1:05 PM [ in reply to The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over ]

camcgee® said:

Doesn't rise to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors," and isn't a big enough deal to have the president removed. And the thing is, as bad as this is, and as good a reason as it is to remove Trump's incompetence, lots of people are so cynical that they can't take this seriously enough as a reason for impeachment. Everything is about partisanship to them, so all allegations of wrongdoing are just cynical parts of the way they think the game of politics is played. To them, it really is a game where you do anything to try to beat the other side, so it's all fine. Whatever.

I'd be fine with Trump being removed at this point, but I just think we're in the midst of a such a cynical, partisan era in politics that it would be impossible to convince enough people to make that happen. If it did happen, it would be seen as illegitimate and partisan.




Maybe...but the reality is that the Democrats aren't "overturning the results of the last election."

Their reward, should they actually succeed in impeaching Trump: Mike Pence. Who is an actual, dyed-in-the-wool conservative - fiscally, internationally, religiously - and who will seem utterly sane and grounded in comparison to His Orangeness. All he has to do to look like a world-beater in comparison is not tweet dumb stuff and act vaguely presidential, and maybe start doing daily White House briefings again, and he'll look like an All-Star.

To the point, actually, the Democrats might just get Pence re-elected in 2020. Look no further than Dabo to see how well an interim appointment can seize the moment, you know?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That's why Trump was so wise to implicate Pence and throw


Nov 20, 2019, 1:07 PM

him under the bus. Republicans can't vote to remove Trump with Pence in hot water over his involvement in this scheme.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well, this is wrong


Nov 20, 2019, 1:15 PM

1

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wait...today he is wise?


Nov 20, 2019, 1:21 PM [ in reply to That's why Trump was so wise to implicate Pence and throw ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Perjury is only a reason to be disbarred in Arkansas


Nov 20, 2019, 1:07 PM [ in reply to The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over ]

Not an impeachable offense. When Biden admitted to a quid pro quo while VP, he could have been impeached, but wasn't. Again, unless something major NEW happens, nothing to see here. I honestly thought there would be some kind of bombshell. Well, not really. You guys waited two years for Mueller's bombshell. Never materialized. I think the American people are smarter than the average politician.

We do quid pro quo's around the world every day. You don't just hand out $50 billion a year to #### near every country on Earth and expect nothing in return. That's the whole reason we give so much, to promote our interests.

The Senate is not going to buy this. The people are not. I wouldn't want Barak Obama impeached over this if it was him. I didn't want Clinton impeached over perjury about a bj. I'm non-partisan here. Stick a fork in us if this succeeds, without something more substantial. Because then it really won't matter who wins the next election. If every time Congress aligns to one party, both houses, and the President is of another party, there WILL BE IMPEACHMENT. Every. Time.

Banana republic stuff there. Which is why this won't work. It's more dangerous than Trump in the long run.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Not even sure what you're talking about with Biden***


Nov 20, 2019, 1:14 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I know. No one ever mentions that Biden admitted that while


Nov 20, 2019, 1:42 PM

VP he did exactly what Trump is now accused of doing. But in as specific and direct a way as one could imagine. Here, watch this hard-to-find video. Talking about firing the Ukranian prosecutor who was investigating the company where his son was on the board and pocketed millions knowing absolutely nothing about oil and natural gas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_xXx0yUvSw

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You realize that Biden's "admission" was in 2018, right?***


Nov 20, 2019, 1:20 PM [ in reply to Perjury is only a reason to be disbarred in Arkansas ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If that's what he's talking about...


Nov 20, 2019, 1:25 PM

then it's just more of the cynical partisan silliness. There was international and Ukrainian pressure to remove the Ukrainian prosecutor at that time because he wasn't being hard enough on corruption. This Trump-centric theory that the prosecutor was removed because he was being too hard on corruption is foolish. Maybe Biden was the wrong person to head that campaign because of the appearance of a conflict, but you have to think everything revolves around Trump to think the removal was just about Hunter Biden and Burisma.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think nothing revolves around Trump when I see the son of


Nov 20, 2019, 1:54 PM

the VP on the board of a foreign energy company for literally no other reason than being the VP's son, then the VP demands the person investigating that foreign company is fired or aid is withheld, because he WASN'T doing a good job investigating corruption?

And for a prosecutor so "WEAK", he was at least actually investigating the company, and Biden sure seemed adamant he be fired because he wasn't doing a "weak" job investigating corruption? Please. That is the excuse.

But the whole point is the quid pro quo. That's exactly what Biden did. It happens all the time, in all administrations, party notwithstanding.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Why didn't it bother you when it happened?***


Nov 20, 2019, 1:58 PM

1

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

not in a tin foil hat conspiracy way


Nov 20, 2019, 2:17 PM

i have a feeling that this wasn't making national headlines among other things going on.

I've never paid attention to our foreign policy with the Ukraine until now. I know that's a me problem.

I just feel like it probably wasn't being shoved down our throats by the media like other stories are. I could be wrong and be the guy living under a rock.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Why do you continue to believe the lie?


Nov 20, 2019, 2:36 PM [ in reply to I think nothing revolves around Trump when I see the son of ]

1.) US policy, EU, IMF, and even Republican Senators all pushed to have Shokin(Ukraine Prosecutor) fired.

https://www.vox.com/2019/10/3/20896869/trump-biden-ukraine-2016-letter-portman-johnson

2.) Shokin wasn't investigating Burisma when Biden was spearheading getting rid of Shokin

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/

"Burisma Holdings was not under scrutiny at the time Joe Biden called for Shokin's ouster, according to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, an independent agency set up in 2014 that has worked closely with the FBI.

Shokin's office had investigated Burisma, but the probe focused on a period before Hunter Biden joined the company, according to the anti-corruption bureau.

The investigation dealt with the Ministry of Ecology, which allegedly granted special permits to Burisma between 2010 and 2012, the agency said. Hunter Biden did not join the company until 2014."

3.) Quid Pro Quos do happen in foreign policy, but not for personal political reasons like with what Trump is accused of. We can't allow that precedent to be set.

4.) I know you'll still be convinced Biden did what you say he did (despite reality), but I wonder what would it actually take to convince you otherwise? When you are this conditioned to believe something as you and others are with this Biden story, do you work on reflex or do you actually take time to consider why you believe what you believe?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's because this is one of those born yesterday issues


Nov 20, 2019, 2:39 PM

Most people only know about it because it's been used as a defense of what Trump did. They see Biden withholding funds to get Ukraine to do something, and they see a formal similarity. So they don't bother to look into what was actually going on at the time.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

But when facts are pointed out they continue w/the lie


Nov 20, 2019, 2:47 PM

Maybe that's to be expected--from both political sides--when things are as partisan and cynical as they are (and you described accurately in this thread).

As Trump would say, "Sad!"

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Because I didn't believe the last lie with Russian collusion


Nov 20, 2019, 3:37 PM [ in reply to Why do you continue to believe the lie? ]

I waited two years for the evidence. There was none. Now I'm waiting on something more than what happened here. A country as infamous for corruption as Ukraine has the son of a sitting US VP on a board of their largest company who doesn't know jack about oil or natural gas, making millions. I'd want that investigated. So did Trump. And he leveraged US aid. Fine. Biden previously leveraged US aid to the corrupt country known for corruption who's largest business happens to have his son on the board.

This isn't impeachable. Well, it is in the House. Not in the Senate. Same story, 20 years later. Knew it would happen. And it will happen again and again until we reach banana republic status.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Does the timing or method Trump took not make you wonder?


Nov 20, 2019, 4:36 PM

Why wait until Biden is running? Why send your personal attorney instead of going through state dept or justice department (btw, Giuliani is now being federally investigated)? Why make it clear you need a public declaration that Biden is going to be investigated before releasing the military aid? Why was Zelensky set to make the announcement on CNN only to back out once the aid was released? Why were so many who listened in on the phone call worried about what they heard? Where else has Trump gone after corruption in regards to giving arms/money?

Investigate Biden all you want, but it doesn't change the circumstances and reasons Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine and if you allow this type of behavior to go unpunished (as the GOP seems they want to do) then we certainly will be heading towards a more authoritarian style of government.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

To point #2


Nov 20, 2019, 4:28 PM [ in reply to Why do you continue to believe the lie? ]

I have a chicken and egg type question (s)

The company that Biden joined had already been investigated. A VP’s son joins the board of said company and its kosher?

I’m on mobile with a phone about to die, (so I’m not looking at which came first) but he joins the company the same time the anti corruption group is formed. Is that interesting timing or just coincidental?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


“I think the American people are smarter than the average politician.”


Nov 20, 2019, 1:23 PM [ in reply to Perjury is only a reason to be disbarred in Arkansas ]

The American people elected Trump. That’s shows you how dumb they are. The movie Idiocracy is playing out in front of our eyes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: “I think the American people are smarter than the average politician.”


Nov 21, 2019, 10:54 AM

You're just wrong again. Actually the American people are smarter than politicians give them credit for. Trumps election proves that.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I was just thinking that of all things to down for


Nov 20, 2019, 1:09 PM [ in reply to The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over ]

This one is dumb.

Maybe I don’t understand the political climate in Ukraine at all, but to lose your presidency over something like this seems crazy to me.

It’s like getting divorced from your wife because she doesn’t clean up her socks and meanwhile she’s actually doing some serious stuff.

I’m not on the cynical and fatigued side necessarily, just the fact that this was a dumb thing for Trump to do to finally be the one that sticks. If that makes sense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Maybe that's "Trump fatigue"


Nov 20, 2019, 1:13 PM

He bumbles around so much that it just seems like none of his bumbles are a big deal. I think this is the thing that's most likely to stick because it's just so blatant. I agree that it's stupid, but what's stupid about it is the way Trump went about things. A more competent person could've gone about this in a different way and probably avoided any scandal at all. Or, maybe a less narcissistic person wouldn't have been so insecure about his political rivals. But we've got Trump, so here we are.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Simplify it. Trump jeopardized US


Nov 20, 2019, 1:20 PM [ in reply to I was just thinking that of all things to down for ]

and Ukraine(an emerging weaker country we agreed to protect) national security for his own benefit. He put his own personal interests above the country's. And if allowed to stay in office, he will do it again...with probably more disastrous consequences.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

jeopardized?


Nov 20, 2019, 1:27 PM

As typical..this seems a bit far left of reality.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Depends how important you think supporting Ukraine is***


Nov 20, 2019, 1:29 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

EIther way one may think, did we not support Ukraine?***


Nov 20, 2019, 1:30 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We did after Trump knew he got caught.***


Nov 20, 2019, 2:04 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Should've said, when Mulvaney realized they got caught.


Nov 20, 2019, 2:06 PM

Trump doesn't even know what day it is, much less realize the difference in wrong and right.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's when you lose credibility


Nov 20, 2019, 2:14 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That's when you lose credibility


Nov 20, 2019, 2:18 PM

He wasnt really quick on his feet. He said nutty things that you fell for. He was extreme, but nothing witty or thought provoking. Hillary was just a bad candidate. It was the perfect storm for Trump.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And you lose credibility saying that I fell for


Nov 20, 2019, 2:25 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Are we still talking about the guy who utters provable,


Nov 20, 2019, 2:30 PM

demonstrable lies nearly every single time he opens his mouth in public? That's the guy who excellent at remembering facts and figures? THAT guy?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Again, you are equating statements that are usually


Nov 20, 2019, 2:34 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So intentional lies are more honorable than...confusion?


Nov 20, 2019, 2:51 PM

Do I have it right?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No you still don’t


Nov 20, 2019, 3:25 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You want examples because you believe he doesn't lie?


Nov 20, 2019, 4:02 PM

I'll give you some links, but if you're just simply not acknowledging that Trump intentionally lies almost every time he's in front of a microphone, I won't bother. This is a pretty easy one.

Ah, fuggit. Here's his roughly 14,000 falsehoods since his inauguration.

https://projects.thestar.com/donald-trump-fact-check/

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That much data might break Tnet's servers. LOL.***


Nov 20, 2019, 4:21 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Your statement is blowing my mind.


Nov 20, 2019, 3:40 PM [ in reply to Again, you are equating statements that are usually ]

https://www.axios.com/trump-101-his-advisers-talk-about-him-like-hes-a-child-1513302088-7d6d03f1-bf9d-4f88-9679-37a54ce8f56a.html

He's misspelled his name and Melania's name on Twitter.

(can't say united states and overall weird) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqlhUg8xFhE

(revolutionary war airports) https://time.com/5620936/donald-trump-revolutionary-war-airports/

(oranges) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUPsNgmXR7M

(Windmill noise causes cancer)https://youtu.be/Q0s5Zqmb09g?t=34

There are so so so so so many other examples (every speech when he ad libs usually has multiples)

But yeah, Biden has said some "old man" things too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ahh so now we are policing spelling and grammar


Nov 20, 2019, 4:10 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Your argument was "he (Trump) definitely isn't confused."


Nov 20, 2019, 4:24 PM

that's your words.

Your criteria for this statement seemed to be misstatements as shown by your pointing out of Biden's misstatement on what state he was in.

I post misstatements and evidence of Trump being treated like a toddler by his own staff and all that you see is me policing spelling and grammar?

Something tells me you aren't being genuine in your arguments. ;)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No I am and I’m sure you believe you are as well


Nov 20, 2019, 4:36 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I also posted clips of trump talking.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:44 PM

Why didn't you bring those up?

Gee, I wonder where you got the idea that the NYT and WAPO are biased. Also, just curious, what sources are not biased in your opinion?

Oh, I forgot another example to bring up:



Clearly a sane thing to do for someone clearly of his right mind.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I am the first to admit that Trump is flawed


Nov 20, 2019, 4:53 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Glad we can both agree Trump is flawed.***


Nov 20, 2019, 5:02 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And you lose credibility saying that I fell for


Nov 20, 2019, 2:55 PM [ in reply to And you lose credibility saying that I fell for ]

He is confused if one has to go with facts. He just says anything and his cult believes it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Part of his following is cult-like


Nov 20, 2019, 3:21 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ya he does a great job of remembering facts, like where his dad


Nov 20, 2019, 7:18 PM [ in reply to And you lose credibility saying that I fell for ]

was born. And then he continued to be great at remembering it the next few times it came up after he was corrected...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LOL. They're both confused.


Nov 20, 2019, 2:42 PM [ in reply to That's when you lose credibility ]

But Trump is a true ratard when it comes to leading an administration and policy.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He may be quick on his feet with insults and attacks,


Nov 20, 2019, 7:15 PM [ in reply to That's when you lose credibility ]

but he is not quick on his feet with critical thought. Even when he tries to plan, which rarely happens, it falls flat. He thought changing a map with a sharpie would make people believe he was right.

And yes, he won the nomination when the party was very fractured, and then won the election against someone a large portion of the country, even independents, hated.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So tell me again how we "jeopardized" Ukraine?***


Nov 20, 2019, 2:37 PM [ in reply to Should've said, when Mulvaney realized they got caught. ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do you really not know? You're a pretty straight shooter


Nov 20, 2019, 4:12 PM

IE, so I don't think you're being snarky.

1)Lack of military aid when they are fighting a territorial war against the Russians. The "but Obama only gave them blankets" defense doesn't work here because the previous Ukraine administration under Poroshenko was corrupt af, and the Ukranian people did the right thing and voted his a s s out. Obama probably still should've provided military aid though.

2)If we stop providing military aid to Ukraine, Russia (Putin) knows this and can run his tanks as far as he wants to in Ukraine. Their soldiers die.

3)If Ukraine does not get military aid and a show of support from the US (a white house visit would work), citizen support for a new Ukrainian president would wain in a country we are trying to help as an ally against Russia. If his citizens don't support him...chaos...Putin wins, again.

4)The Crowdstrike story, Burisma wrongdoing, and Ukranian meddling in the 2016 are all propaganda put forth by Putin. Proven so by the testimony of Yovanovich and the retraction of testimony by the former Ukraine attorney general. So when Trump pushes this narrative and tries to make it fact, he is destabilizing Ukraine's new government that is dedicated to ending Poroshenko's corruption and actively supporting Putin's propaganda.

I can keep going if you need it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We never stopped sending aid to them.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:44 PM

1) I never mentioned Obama.
2) We never stopped sending them money.
3) See #2. All the rest, to a president that I read on here daily is hated world wide..would be meaningless.
4) That's a pretty giant leap of logic that the Crowdstrike nonsense will destabilize any countries government.

What's with Dems and all the hyperbole?? You're saying that mere words by the Liar in Chief ($1 to @cChuckston T-Man is going to destabilize a country?

C'mon man..pump the brakes on all that stuff.

Just like Catahoula, I get it. WE ALL GET IT. You don't like the guy. But making up that nonsense does nothing to make you even seem beleivable. You blame Trump for the same thing, and you say he's an idiot (daily). How are you, or the rest of anyone who is making up this farcicle hyperbole any more credible than him?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There is not a bit of hyperbole in any of my statements.


Nov 20, 2019, 5:06 PM

We can disagree and that is fine, I stated what the ambassadors and other diplomats(they are the experts) stated in their testimony and all of them were emphatic about the effect on Ukrainian national security as a result of Trump's actions. Don't believe me? Believe them.

And of course I don't like him, he's taking a giant shid in the highest office in the country and is proud of himself for it. His kind of behavior should be acceptable to no one. What if the crazy democrat version of Trump gets in office in the future? I know you don't want that...I don't either. I think Trump should be the benchmark for what/why/how/who a President shouldn't be.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We stopped the aid for 55 days.


Nov 20, 2019, 5:10 PM [ in reply to We never stopped sending aid to them. ]

The White House released the aid after the whistleblower and investigations started.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Did they get the money, or not?


Nov 20, 2019, 5:28 PM

And I'm not sue why I'm concerned about giving Ukraine money for fighting basically a back door war with Russia.

When did the dems become such warhawks?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Only after the whistleblower/investigations started.


Nov 20, 2019, 5:42 PM

The need (Ukraine faces threat from Russia) for the aid was the leverage Trump held to force Ukraine to do him a favor (public announcement of investigating Biden/personal benefit) and he held the aid for 55 days. Zelensky, in turn, was set to make an announcement of his investigation on CNN.

Timeline:

-Congress passes (bipartisan support) aid of Ukraine.

-Trump puts on on aid for 55 days

-Trump asks for favor "in return" for releasing the aid (public announcement of Biden investigation from Ukraine)

-Whistleblower/investigations start into the quid pro quo.

-Money is released (leverage is removed)

-Zelensky cancels CNN announcement. Ukraine receives their aid.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Only after the whistleblower/investigations started.


Nov 21, 2019, 11:01 AM

The problem with aid to Ukraine is much of it has been diverted from day one from it's intended sources. What's wrong with Trump holding it up on his watch until he sees if Zelensky comes through on his election promises to clean up Ukrainian corruption? He's only following through on his own campaign promises.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It does. And if this was the only thing Trump did wrong, then


Nov 20, 2019, 1:28 PM [ in reply to I was just thinking that of all things to down for ]

I would agree. I know you have to try to isolate this one potential infraction as the only thing to decide whether or not to impeach him, but I think while this may be impeachable, it’s being used as an excuse to impeach him for everything else- his stupidity, his lack of any plan, his childish and attacking behavior, his complete lack of preparedness or competence for this role. So while yes, I agree that it’s kind of silly if this is what brings him down, I think people are mostly trying to bring him down because he’s clearly unfit to be president, and this is just the excuse to do it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over


Nov 20, 2019, 1:17 PM [ in reply to The defense is just that this isn't worth impeaching over ]

Exactly

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

at what point does the worm turn and


Nov 20, 2019, 2:42 PM

Nikki get into the race?

I don't see the GOP supporting impeachment of Trump and then embracing Mike Pence.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You'll lose more ground with independents anyway.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:13 PM

No one is paying any attention to this kangaroo court anymore.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:14 PM

Even with Sondland's statement Trump did nothing wrong. Also, impeachment is political indictment, not criminal. Trump isn't going anywhere. He'll win in 2020 in a landslide.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 4:34 PM

Quid Pro Quo is not unethical or criminal no matter what you say. This is much ado about nothing as usual. Get a friggin life and let the Republic stand.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm assuming you wrote this during the break before he


Nov 20, 2019, 5:06 PM

was cross-examined? The one where Schiff ran out and held a press-conference saying what you basically repeated verbatim? That's the only way I can see you writing what you wrote with a straight face.

Where to start:

"Sondland has never been anti-Trump". What???

https://www.wweek.com/news/2016/08/07/two-portland-hotel-executives-disavow-donald-trump-after-being-listed-among-his-event-sponsors/

How can you watch this following clip and now act like it's "game over"? Schiff said over and over he had no evidence of anything coming from Trump, and that it was all "presumed" (his words, not mine) on his part.

https://youtu.be/e_c17vxrPWQ

There's no more evidence than there was yesterday, and anyone who insists there is is the foolish one, because it's clear that impeachment is what you want, and the reasons are really irrelevant.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I'm assuming you wrote this during the break before he


Nov 20, 2019, 10:00 PM

Sorry dude, I missed the press conference. I'm going on Sondland's words that everyone was in on it and knew about it, and that the president made the direct orders.

Sondland gave the Trump campaign $1 million. He's not some anti Trumper and y'all aren't going to be able to paint him as someone with a political axe to grind against Trump.

This is bad for Trump. You know it's bad.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


You really need to go back and watch the entire testimony


Nov 20, 2019, 10:49 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The irony is that I'm going off Sondeland's words too.


Nov 20, 2019, 11:17 PM [ in reply to Re: I'm assuming you wrote this during the break before he ]

That's completely false that he said the President gave the direct orders, in fact here's a clip showing exactly the opposite, and also saying that "everyone was in on it" was a presumption on his part. There was zero communication from anyone to him, (according to him, right here) that quid pro quo was the plan.

https://youtu.be/EnEWYilDgcg

How can you watch this and feel good about impeaching a President over this? Someone wouldn't get convicted for hit and run over testimony this weak, much less the President of our country getting impeached.

And come on.....are you seriously throwing that $1mil out as if the elite haven't been buying positions in administrations since long before you and I walked the Earth---you really think that's a sign of total support? If you're going by his words, why do you throw them out so casually on this topic?

Again, if someone thinks this is game, set, match, just admit it....you just want Trump gone, one reason is as good as another, and you're willing to suspend respect for the office and how impeachment should be used because it's convenient.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I was getting ready to post that video haha


Nov 20, 2019, 11:29 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's like they don't understand the legal ramifications


Nov 20, 2019, 11:38 PM

(or lack thereof) of the man saying out loud that every opinion he holds on quid pro quo is a presumption on his part, with no basis in provided instructions or tangible evidence.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


He said that in regards to the military aid quid pro quo


Nov 21, 2019, 1:19 AM

He was unequivocal there was a quid pro quo in regards to a white house meeting. He ties in Giuliani (and others) as well. Now, considering Trump directly ties the military aid (confirming what Sondland says Giuliani told him) to doing him a favor in his call to Zelensky, I'm not sure it matters about the "presumption" being much of a defense. We also have all the other testimony and evidence provided in these hearings.

I do think Giuliani is getting closer and closer to being pulled into this thing more directly. Along with others like Perry, Mulvaney, Pompeo, etc.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Again though, there are no direct orders on record anywhere


Nov 21, 2019, 7:35 AM

For such, nor was he saying that’s how he was instructed. It’s not enough for a traditional conviction by any stretch, and if there’s enough for impeachment in the house, it’s clearly because house Dems are ok with pushing this broken down car across the finish line.

Playing devil’s advocate, if there actually is anything there, and there may or may not be, I have a feeling Rudy will be the patsy.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You should file articles of impeachment on Cat.


Nov 21, 2019, 9:03 AM [ in reply to The irony is that I'm going off Sondeland's words too. ]

I'm sure there's enough opinion to have him removed from office here on Tnet.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm presuming he's violated board rules.


Nov 21, 2019, 9:07 AM

I mean, everybody knew it and was in the loop. Never saw him do it, but I know he did. He should be banned any day now.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 8:53 PM

You guys are so hilarious with all your BS.........Go Tigers !!!!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks.


Nov 20, 2019, 11:42 PM

Not if Fox News has anything to say about it. Tucker Carlson's show followed the hearing and his big headline was "No Quid Pro Quo".


They will run with what Sondland said Trump told him despite the fact that Sondland also testified that he didn't know if Trump was being truthful and he still believes there absolutely was a quid pro quo.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I'll trust him on who has the best bourbon list in DC, or


Nov 20, 2019, 11:45 PM

his opinion on what dogs make the best pets, but when it comes to impeaching a President--any President---I'm gonna need a little more than personal opinion. I hope this would be a common sense stance to take.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Forget what Fox or Tucker Carlson says


Nov 20, 2019, 11:47 PM [ in reply to Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks. ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Felix and half a doz other posters here think Carlson...


Nov 21, 2019, 9:09 AM

and any other Fox personality lie for a living. They believe those folks lay awake at night and figure out which is the best lie to tell tomorrow.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's just a lazy hot take......


Nov 21, 2019, 9:13 AM

if someone is taking any non-left position, they must be getting spoon-fed by Fox. I've watched more olympic curling in the last two months than I have Fox news.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I watch Fox but I'm selective which episodes of opinion...


Nov 21, 2019, 11:35 AM

people I watch. Dershowitz, Solomon and Starr along with a few of the more reasonable and seasoned vets always get my attention. I liked Shepard Smith and Baier and McCallum but as far as every minute of ever episode of the others not so much.

It doesn't bother me that everyone knows I watch Fox. I post almost no links to fox many less than to NYT and Politico.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm just more of a reader.


Nov 21, 2019, 12:12 PM

I prefer my news without any personality injected, and I can skim it or read it twice as required.

Just a personal preference. Of all the Fox guys you mentioned, Shep is probably the most "just the facts" to me, with as little fluff as possible.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well Shep is gone now


Nov 21, 2019, 12:22 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I read my news too, I don’t watch news on TV. After reading


Nov 21, 2019, 12:26 PM [ in reply to I'm just more of a reader. ]

all the major news sites, I’ve found Fox has the most opinion injected into them. They don’t even try to hide the bias. CNN may be worse on TV, I don’t know, but Fox is definitely the least objective and factual of all the MSM sources I read.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

People believe the earth is flat...


Nov 21, 2019, 9:07 AM [ in reply to Re: He's done. Sorry, Trump folks. ]

that rocks fall because that's where they belong and smoke rises for the same reason. Strong believe is not evidence and it is Sondland's strong belief that fueled all of the dem witnesses in this round of hearings.

I'm still trying to figure out how neither party hasn't recommended perjury charges against Sondland for making contradictory statements.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Who TDed this?


Nov 21, 2019, 11:27 AM

Man, if you got something to say spit it out. You're TDing a Tiger fan.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 143
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic