»
Topic: This is what really bothers the Coots about us winning a BCS
Replies: 26   Last Post: Jan 6, 2014 10:40 PM by: Starman57®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 26  

This is what really bothers the Coots about us winning a BCS

[3]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 4:51 PM
 

bowl, and I say this as a Clemson fan. This was their year. They were probably the best team in the SEC this year and will finish in the top 5. They know if they had played with heart and not mailed it in against UGA and Tenn they would be playing for a National Championship.


"best team in the SEC " LMAO thanks***

[4]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 4:53 PM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

i think what burns them up is that they really are the very

[9]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 4:54 PM
 

definition of the proverbial red-headed step-child. no one wants them. bowl games pass them over left and right. no one is interested in having a bunch of coots come to their town and buy up all the busch light and spit dip all over their sidewalks.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

FAT TAX NOW!


LOL...

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 4:57 PM
 

I like the 'buy up all the busch light and spit dip all over their sidewalks'....good one!

2020 white level member

I love it when coots say that everybody hates them.

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 4:59 PM
 

The refs, anouncers, TV scheduling, SEC scheduling.....

I always say yep, everybody hates you. Not in a New England Patiots way because you are good, but in a Dallas Cowboys way because Jerry Jones is a jerk.


Re: I love it when coots say that everybody hates them.


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:03 PM
 

Everybody hates them because most everybody hates Spurrier and his huge ego and his smart a##.


People dislike the coots because of their classless fans***

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:04 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: i think what burns them up is that they really are the very


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:17 PM
 

which bowl passed on us? BCS couldn't pick us based on the rules for the last three years, and in 2 of those years CapOne took us with the first SEC pick. obviously they didn't want the same school 2 years in a row so outback took us with the next pick


USuC was NOT

[4]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:01 PM
 

the best team in the SEC. Alabama, Auburn, LSU are better. They lost to UGA when UGA was at full strength. Miracle win at Missouri. Would not beat Mizzou if they played again. And Texas A & M is better. They lost to Tennessee. Elite teams don't lose to Tennessee this year. They are pobably the sixth best team in the SEC.

Maybe sixth place rings this year?


Re: USuC was NOT


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:18 PM
 

we will finish 6th in the COUNTRY at worst, in part thanks to Clemson.


They lost to UGA and UT because their talent is limited...

[4]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:03 PM
 

Spurrier has done an unbelievable coaching job, but if you compare actual talent on their team compared to the other top 10 teams all other 9 teams talent is more impressive than SCU's. You can hate Spurrier as much as you want, but he is doing an unbelievable job of getting the most out of limited talent. Take away their top 5 players and the rest of their team is average talent wise. They only have one elite player on offense in Mike Davis. If SCU had the talent they would have already won the SEC.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

You're crazy! They have talent all over the field.


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:38 PM
 

Can you imagine if Bruce Ellington, Mike Davis, and Shaq Rollin had come to Clemson?

military_donation.jpg

Very, Very Excited. Very, Very Proud.


Mike Davis is great. Ellington and Shaq Roland would have

[2]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:43 PM
 

Been way down the depth chart at WR. Ellington may have started over Humphries but he doesn't block, which is what Adam was out there for. Roland is a great deep threat, but Sammy and Martavius are better.


Bruce Ellington wouldn't even be playing WR at Clemson...

[2]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:02 PM
 

So far Shaq Roland has been a bust for them and has major attitude issues. Roland got suspended for a few games, and a number of gamecock fans told me he was suspended for looking at #### on school computers. Is that the type of player you want at Clemson?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Mike Davis is the only one of those that would've played

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:15 PM
 

Maybe Ellington could've gotten more PT when Peake went down, but his numbers weren't even as good as Bryant's this year.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Bub

They lost to UGA and UT because...

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:27 PM
 

they didn't play four quarters. South Carolina has plenty of talent and depth but too often gets lazy.

Because of it, they got to see a less-lazy team they beat play in the championship game for the third straight year.


Half right. They thought this was their year because

[2]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:12 PM
 

they didn't have to play the best teams in the conference.

But they still couldn't handle it.


Re: This is what really bothers the Coots about us winning a BCS

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:44 PM
 

Or the fact that after all this, we are still their DADDY!! ORANGE BOWL CHAMPIONS!


they better be glad there isnt a final BCS poll.


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 5:59 PM
 

Their losses to UGA and TN and beating #19 WISC might fall light to us beating 12-1 #7 OSU and having only losses to FSU and them. The BCS don't system don't see the names of schools you lose to it only sees the teams records. We could have ended up ahead of them in a final BCS poll, especially if FSU wins big vs AUB.

Go Tigers!

military_donation.jpg

well, nope they knew they wouldn't win anything

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:02 PM
 

they never have, never will...except for some stupid made up title maybe

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Bub

They WERE the best team in the SEC this year...


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:11 PM
 

...to lose to Tennessee.


Re: This is what really bothers the Coots about us winning a BCS


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 6:30 PM
 

The Georgia loss didn't hurt near as bad as the Tennessee loss. Seems like every year there's one game that keeps us from Atlanta .... '13 Tenn, '12 Florida, '11 Auburn, #### in '10 we lost to Kentucky after beating #1 Alabama even though we did win the division that year. Win those games and we would have won our division every year but that's all woulda, shoulda, coulda which means didn't.

Personally the thing that bothers me is that Clemson got to a BCS game without a win over a ranked team while we won @ Missouri, @ Central Florida, and Clemson. But hey, you beat a top 10 team and have a Orange Bowl trophy so congratulations because for that you deserve bragging rights.


So our win of UGA doesn't count because they weren't

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 10:24 PM
 

ranked at the end of the year?

military_donation.jpg

Very, Very Excited. Very, Very Proud.


What makes the rest of the country mad is that the only r

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 10:26 PM
 

reason half the teams in the SEC that are ranked is because of the conference they play in.

military_donation.jpg

Very, Very Excited. Very, Very Proud.


Good but nowhere near that good***


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 10:25 PM
 



2020 student level member

UGa was # 5 OSU # 7. Bottom line is its any given day***

[1]
Posted: Jan 6, 2014 10:28 PM
 



2020 student level member

Exactly!!***


Posted: Jan 6, 2014 10:40 PM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Replies: 26  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: Two for sale lower south sec:H row:II seats 13,15(about 18 yard line) about 10 steps below the porta...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
2401 people have read this post