|
Replies: 104
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6575]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5488
Joined: 9/22/16
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 7:28 AM
|
|
Schuess is better than Bentley. And I'm not saying goes that because I'm a Clemson Homer. It's reality.
Our backup is better than their starter athe every position
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 7:49 AM
|
|
lol you might want to take off those orange glasses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [630]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 855
Joined: 10/12/11
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 7:54 AM
|
|
Coming from The most delusional fan base in the country. Run along now coot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9174]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 14648
Joined: 2/5/02
|
Celery Strings don't make good dental floss
Nov 6, 2016, 8:30 AM
[ in reply to Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk ] |
|
and neither does any of your thoughts.
What’s the over/under of how long ‘till the next CANARD reply from the Little Bitties on this board to defend their next PR train wreck?
-Telsa
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4855]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3598
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 9:12 AM
|
|
Not really.
At worst 5-4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4855]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3598
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I guess my extra hour of sleep has me believing
Nov 6, 2016, 9:29 AM
|
|
that a gamecock will be able to grasp facts and logic. I'm probably fooling myself. I've watched your team this season and I've watched all of these teams. Auburn, Troy, Louisville, NC State and FSU are all clearly better than you. GT, BC and Syracuse would all beat you on a good day. At least one of the three would pull it off.
So where do you see 5 wins at worst?
09/03 @Auburn 19-13 W ESPN Loss
09/10 Troy$ 30-24 W ACCN Loss
09/17 SC State+ 59-0 W RSN Sure win (so was the Citadel)
09/22 @Georgia Tech 26-7 W ESPN Probable loss
10/01 Louisville% 42-36 W ABC Loss
10/07 @Boston College 56-10 W ESPN Toss up
10/15 NC State~ 24-17 W Loss
10/29 @Florida State 37-34 W ABC Loss
11/05 Syracuse^ 54-0 W ABC/ESPN2 Toss up
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2112]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 3058
Joined: 6/19/10
|
Re: I guess my extra hour of sleep has me believing
Nov 6, 2016, 9:37 AM
|
|
GT would beat them by three TDs, they beat Vandy 38-7 already. They would probably win 2 out of NC State, Syracuse, and BC and then beat SC State. 3 wins more than likely and maybe four if they pulled an upset of Troy or another team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
You barely beat a terrible Vanderbilt team....
Nov 6, 2016, 9:56 AM
|
|
who lost by 31 to Georgia Tech.
SEC!, SEC!, SEC!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6392
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Re: You barely beat a terrible Vanderbilt team....
Nov 6, 2016, 2:35 PM
|
|
And lost to a Kentucky team that Louisville will drop at least 50 points on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4855]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3598
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 9:59 AM
[ in reply to Re: I guess my extra hour of sleep has me believing ] |
|
Based on my knowledge of football and what I have seen on the field, SC State is the only team we've played that I'm sure you would beat. The other teams on our schedule are either better than you in every phase of the game or they match up well enough at critical positions to make the outcome likely losses for the chickens.
I asked for your informed reasoning for thinking you would win 5 games and I got
Lol! ACC! ACC! ACC!
Go home, gamecock.
And get your finger out of your nose.
Noooo!!! Don't put it in your mouth!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 10:07 AM
|
|
You must have very limited knowledge if you're seriously trying to argue "better than you in every phase of the game or they match up well enough at critical position to make the outcome likely losses for the chickens."
Please explain these matchups.
The only games that would be a definitive loss would be Louisville.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [919]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1026
Joined: 11/28/14
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 10:11 AM
|
|
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4855]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3598
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Sorry. I have other things to do today and
Nov 6, 2016, 10:15 AM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
you've shown that you would neither understand nor accept my observations.
Enjoy your resurgence. You have the foundation for world domination incubating in Columbia.
LOL! SEC! SEC! SEC!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2861]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4308
Joined: 8/30/08
|
Re: Sorry. I have other things to do today and
Nov 6, 2016, 10:26 AM
|
|
SEC East is the worst division in college football. To quote ESPN this morning "dumpster fire".
From what I have seen from NC State they are better than SC. Also Syracuse would be a loss with their starting QB. SC could not score with them. BC SC wins. AU loss, Troy is a very solid team- loss based on what I have seen.
3-4 wins at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6392
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Re: Sorry. I have other things to do today and
Nov 6, 2016, 2:46 PM
|
|
SEC East reminds me of the ACC Coastal from about 5 or so years ago.
The SEC East wheel of destiny...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21757]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13546
Joined: 11/8/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: And when's the last time y'all beat Auburn?
Nov 6, 2016, 12:22 PM
|
|
We would probably lose to them.
But they were nonexistent on offense when you played them so there was a chance of us being lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
They were non-existent on offense....
Nov 6, 2016, 1:00 PM
|
|
because of the Clemson defense something your pitiful little offense will experience first hand in three weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 199
Joined: 11/3/02
|
Re: And when's the last time y'all beat Auburn?
Nov 6, 2016, 1:04 PM
[ in reply to Re: And when's the last time y'all beat Auburn? ] |
|
Maybe their offense being non existent had a little to do with the fact our D is pretty good. Don't give us any credit though, I know you think Auburn beat themselves
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: And when's the last time y'all beat Auburn?
Nov 6, 2016, 1:17 PM
|
|
Of course Clemson played a part but their offense was nothing like it's been the last few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:40 PM
|
|
We'll start with Strength of Schedule.
$CU - 53
NC State - 49
Georgia Tech - 47
Boston College - 56
Syracuse - 31
FSU - 2
Now, let's look at national rankings in terms of total offense;
$CU - 120
NC State - 63
Georgia Tech - 70
Boston College - 126
Syracuse - 38
FSU - 34
Now, let's look at national rankings in terms of total defense;
$CU - 52
NC State - 26
Georgia Tech - 64
Boston College - 15
Syracuse - 111
FSU - 73
In light of the above, $CU would likely be decided underdogs against NC State, Georgia Tech and FSU.
The Boston College and Syracuse games would be toss-up games for $CU at best (at best).
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:50 PM
|
|
How did NCST do against ECU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:51 PM
|
|
It's going to be so funny when the Tigers put 50 on y'all in 3 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:57 PM
|
|
That's what you said last year...
And our defense was a lot worse last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 2:00 PM
|
|
Do you really believe y'all had a chance to win last season.
The game was never in doubt one time.
This season our players are not going to forget last year.
It's going to be ugly for you Coots.
DWs last game in DV he is going to carve y'all up.
Mark it
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 2:11 PM
|
|
Last year? No.
We should have beaten you but we didn't have a QB to take advantage of how poorly y'all played.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
LOL..."we should have beaten you"...lol***
Nov 6, 2016, 2:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [377]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 803
Joined: 10/3/10
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 2:21 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
Lmaoooooooo you clowns should be happy our boys allowed your chumps to even stay in the game. You better pray to whatever God you worship that Clemson isn't focused again because of they are that 35-17 will be home compared to what's going to happen this year. Tell are a phuggin JOKE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [377]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 803
Joined: 10/3/10
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 2:21 PM
|
|
Yall**
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
No it wasn't....
Nov 6, 2016, 2:11 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
You just played a tougher schedule. On the other hand, your offense is SIGNIFICANTLY worse even against an easier schedule.
If Clemson doesn't turn the ball over, we'll beat you by at least three or four TD's.
Last year, you were at home and you played your A game. We were looking ahead to UNC, turned it over three times, played a C game, and you still lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7625
Joined: 3/5/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 2:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
They lost to ecu because of stupid turnovers. The same way ecu lost to y'all, because of stupid turnovers. The better team lost both games. It happens. Just like the Tennessee game. Do you honestly believe you have a better team than Tennessee?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 2:31 PM
|
|
Tenn has also had I believe 17 key players injured this season.
The Coots just caught them at the right time if they played 10 times in a row.
Tenn would win 7or8 times, the Coots are a bad team that just got lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 3:07 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
I think Tennessee is better than we are.
I can be objective. It's a shame you can't do the same and acknowledge we are better than NCST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 3:45 PM
|
|
Because you're not better than nc state. And that has nothing to do with how they played us. It has everything to do with how horrible your team is. I've watched pretty much all of every game you've played, and you are just a bad team. Nc state is better, and everyone would agree with that except you delusional USuCk fans.
USuCk is 119 in total offense. 125th in points per game at 19.2(absolutely pathetic)
Nc state is 67 in total offense. 83rd in pts per game at 26.0
USuCk is 53 in total defense
Nc state is 29 in total defense
They are better than you in every metric, and have played a harder schedule. (Any objective fan would agree about their harder schedule)
So how are y'all better than nc state again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 3:48 PM
|
|
If only there was a common opponent where you could see how the teams compared...
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 3:54 PM
|
|
When we play yall and Bently has 2 ints and less they 150 yards you will realize how good he is. Play a D before you claim he is any good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 8298
Joined: 10/8/08
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 4:03 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
You know good and well ECU gift wrapped that game for you with the TO's in the redzone just like we did NC State.
You could beat NC State but to act like they would be an automatic W is just laughable. There not an FBS team that is an automatic win for your team this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 4:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
It doesn't work that way, and you know it. Any team can play a bad game and lose on a given day. That doesn't make them a bad team. Just like y'all beating Tennessee. You even said yourself you weren't better than them. So use that same logic here moron. You really cant be this dumb, can you.
Nc state is a better football team. Deal with it loser.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 8:55 PM
|
|
Is the fact we are improving really that hurtful you have to pretend NCST is better?
Imagine how badly we would have beaten ECU with Bentley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 8298
Joined: 10/8/08
|
Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively.
Nov 6, 2016, 4:04 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK Clueless...less look at this thing objectively. ] |
|
What is sad about their offensive stats is they've played only ONE team that ranks inside the top 50 defensively and that's UGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 199
Joined: 11/3/02
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 12:07 PM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
LOL!
The only sure loss is Louisville?
FSU and Auburn would both smoke you. GT and Troy are probable losses, NC State and Cuse are toss ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 12:23 PM
|
|
FSU is no better than Tennessee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2279
Joined: 9/21/11
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 12:25 PM
|
|
FSU is better at every position than Tennessee including QB. Dobbs is trash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24544]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15113
Joined: 2/13/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:20 PM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
You really need to look at reality. Auburn's defense would live in your backfield & they're running game would blow through your little defense worse than UGA's (umm...remember that game??), Troy's pass rush & defensive line would dominate your o line as well. Georgia Tech would have their way with you (see Georgia Southern III option offense vs. Will Muschamp's UF defense 2014). Louisville (well you know). BC has a better defense than any you've faced thus far but would probably be a toss up. NCSU would also be too strong at d line & would definitely run at will on your defense. FSU would also live in Bentley's back pocket & could easily cover your receivers, & Cook would have 250 yards & 4 TD's alone on your defense. They'd throw the ball on you successfully if you tried to stack the box too. Syracuse would score 40 on you & your offense couldn't keep up. Pitt & James Conner would just play keep away & your defense would yet again get the ball run down their throats while your offense watched from the sidelines. Wake would score on you but another toss up. Sooo.... You have SCSt & two toss up games. Now I'll ask you again....where's your 5 wins against this schedule? Seriously you need to wake up to reality & not be such a blind homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
FSU is a LOT better than UT. UT should be 4-6 right now, lucking out against UGA and app state. You need to take your sorry a$$ back to fgf where the fantasy's grow by the day with your 19 year old child prodigy. Who is going to help him up when Lawrence and Wilkins pounce on him? No one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2279
Joined: 9/21/11
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 12:16 PM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
Bro, your team is not good! I know you think Bentley is the 2nd coming of Joe Montana, but he hasn't faced a Defense ranked in the top 50. I'll bet you $10,000 that Florida beats you guys. I live in Columbia so we an meet face the face to make the bet. TMAIL if you wanna put your money where our mouth is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11/29/15
|
ummmm Florida ain't that good either man***
Nov 6, 2016, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2279
Joined: 9/21/11
|
Re: ummmm Florida ain't that good either man***
Nov 6, 2016, 12:23 PM
|
|
Top 5 defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2218]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 941
Joined: 9/3/09
|
Re: ummmm Florida ain't that good either man***
Nov 6, 2016, 3:08 PM
|
|
Top 5 defense against teams with a combined total offense ranked 80th.
They're garbage as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 12:57 PM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
Good lord man. Please explain to me why these two wins over two teams that in reality just aren't very good has made you think your team is a good football team. You were supposed to beat Mizzou without Bentley, so it goes back to beating Tennessee, something that has just gone to your head. Do you honestly think this win was really that good? Please explain this to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play.
Nov 6, 2016, 1:10 PM
|
|
I don't think we are a good team.
It's just the majority of teams you have played are pretty bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7625
Joined: 3/5/12
|
None of the teams you've played are good***
Nov 6, 2016, 1:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [567]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 1627
Joined: 12/6/11
|
Re: None of the teams you've played are good***
Nov 6, 2016, 1:43 PM
|
|
Lol why do you guys let class09 get to you all? 2 of bentley wins were against umass and mizz both with combined 4 wins. The UT win was atleast a decent win but their fans are basing it off of the UT preseason team, not the actual team that has showed up the previous 3 to 4 wks. They gonna win 6 games and no more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
LOL...bless your heart !!!!
Nov 6, 2016, 2:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: I've watched them play and I've watched your team play. ] |
|
Depending upon which service you prefer to follow, Clemson's strength of schedule is ranked at least 4th in the nation and that's down from the No. 1 spot last week.
ROFL..."the majority of teams you have played are pretty bad."
Obviously the only people who think that and you and the other moral defectives on FGF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [881]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 730
Joined: 10/30/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51531]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43078
Joined: 8/10/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2218]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 941
Joined: 9/3/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22359
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Yeah, no chance. Your offense was horrible for the
Nov 6, 2016, 12:39 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
first 6 games. You definitely would've lost to Auburn, Louisville, and FSU. GT and Troy could've easily been losses because your offense was struggling to score 20 points at the time. Troy is rated much, much higher than an ECU team that grossly outplayed Carolina on their home field. GT destroyed a Vandy team that gave SC all they could handle. I think there's probably 4 losses in those 5 games.
SC State is a win, and BC is probably an ugly 13-10 type win like Vandy was. Cuse is rated similarly to Missouri by Football Outsiders so maybe you win that one, but i have you say that yall didn't exactly stomp the life out of a free falling Mizzou team. NC State is rated in the 40s. That would be a tough game for SC.
Maybe 4 wins, but 3 is more realistic than 5 IMO. Your vastly overrating your schedule and underrating ours. Our SoP (strength of schedule played) was 23rd on FEI heading into this weekend and yours was 86th. You have to realize that the ACC Atlantic is far superior to the SEC East this year, despite what your feathered friends believe.
I also see a wake up call coming for Bentley at Florida next weekend. That defense is way better than anything he's faced thus far, and making his first road start in the Swamp won't be fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 1:24 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! 5-4.......you're a joke. NCState, Fla. State, Louisville, Troy, Auburn, Georgia tech, that's 6 at least. Ok, will give you BC, Syracuse and SCState, but that's about it. Your five wins are against teams with a combined 19-27 record. Clemson will crush you petty coots, bank on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 1:30 PM
|
|
You guys really don't have to pretend NCST is good because they should have beaten you.
Everyone knows it was a fluke and that NCST isn't good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7625
Joined: 3/5/12
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 1:34 PM
|
|
You guys really don't have to pretend Tenn is good because they should have beaten you.
Everyone knows it was a fluke and that Tenn isn't good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22359
Joined: 4/24/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 1:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
I, along with others, asked you to show us the 5 wins against this schedule & you still can't do it. All you chicken shitte fans are the same. Big blow-hards with little bruised egos with nothing to back it up. The question remains...which 5 teams on Clemson's schedule do you beat & why? Back your mouth up coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 1:56 PM
|
|
Definite wins: NCST, SCST, BC, Syracuse. So that's four.
winnable: FSU, GT, Troy or Auburn
So just need one win from the second group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 2:01 PM
|
|
Dude y'all can not beat FSU or Auburn
Do you know how stupid that makes you look
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 2:03 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
You're 0-4 against that "second group" & I told you why. You're still not answering the questions. You've dug yourself quite a hole & you can't get out of it. Y'all are all the same as a fanbase and way too stupid to realize how easy it is to make fun of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88990
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6392
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 3:04 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
Wow, you are an intellectual midget. Very typical and in line with the thinking and logic of your fanbase. You guys get just a small taste of "success" and suddenly you are world beaters!
It would be nice if you could be objective about your team and divison. The East is abysmal. When the ACC was really down and the SEC East was a power there were very few, if any, Clemson fans that would have argued or said that our SOS was superior to yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 3:08 PM
|
|
lol that's just not true. I've posted on here for more than a decade. You can't pull the "we would act differently" card when I was around during that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
you have any links to back up your BS claim Henny Penny?***
Nov 6, 2016, 3:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6392
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 3:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
I didnt say you, I was referring to Clemson fans, and the state of your division vs ours at the time. No one could have argued that our division was stronger than yours.
The delusion is strong with your sir, matched only by your detertimantion to validate the "success" of your coots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 3:32 PM
|
|
Your post doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 8298
Joined: 10/8/08
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 3:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
The difference in SOS wasn't that great back then and it's not now in reality. The truth is a lot of these teams that we nitpick about are much closer and could beat each other on any given day.
Alabama, Clemson, and Lousiville are head and shoulders above everybody in both conferences IMO....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule
Nov 6, 2016, 3:58 PM
[ in reply to Re: chicks would be 3-6 AT BEST against our schedule ] |
|
At FSU and at Auburn are not winable games for yall right now. I know anything can happy but get real dude. Sayin NCst BC and Cuse are definate is ridiculous
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7714]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10685
Joined: 11/19/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [377]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 803
Joined: 10/3/10
|
Re: Sweet Jesus you're an idiot***
Nov 6, 2016, 10:49 AM
|
|
Most of those trash can red necks are idiots, throwing stuff at opposing players all the time, then they think Bentley is a gawd because he beat freaking Missouri and a weak busted ### Tennessee team lok
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1349]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 2455
Joined: 10/1/05
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 1:15 PM
[ in reply to Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk ] |
|
Even Finebaum said the SEC east is the worst division in football. Tennessee and Missouri are among those teams. Bentley has made you better, but your schedule has also made you better. Bentley will be lucky to finish the season healthy after Florida and Clemson. He's gonna get hit a ton. Look at the records of the teams you've beaten. You are not a main player in today's college football. Sorry but that's reality. Run along little chicken! !
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2332]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3530
Joined: 5/7/03
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 7:30 AM
|
|
Those idiots obviously did not watch Bama vs. LSU! UF is going to be ready next Saturday. Clemson will reveal what a talented QB actually can do the last Saturday this month.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [508]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 847
Joined: 4/5/13
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 7:39 AM
|
|
Honestly haven't watched the Bentley kid play much. From what I have seen he looks OK but not great by any means. I think the coots have seen such bad play from their QBs for so long now that even an average one looks like Tom Brady to them. Can't wait to see our defense eat him alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27371]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31824
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Well they did beat
Nov 6, 2016, 12:59 PM
|
|
Missouri . A team that hadn't won a game in forever!
Bentley is better than any qb they have had in years .... which isn't saying much
!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6981]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6353
Joined: 9/21/04
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 7:43 AM
|
|
Bentley has yet to face any kind of pass rush. He will get crushed at Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1857]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 2027
Joined: 10/10/10
|
I just hope Lammons next ejection...
Nov 6, 2016, 8:36 AM
|
|
obviously in the Clemson game, isn't taking out DW. The guy is a THUG, and needs to be out for a few games.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [866]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1093
Joined: 11/24/12
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 10:13 AM
|
|
But truthfully isn't being the best QB in the SEC like being the burger in the McDonald's dollar menu, and Bentley being the best is stretching it a bit. Go Tiger's!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9113
Joined: 1/15/08
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 11:43 AM
|
|
Best two QBs in the SEC are Sean White and Nick Fitzpatrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11/29/15
|
After 2 quarters of Ben Boulware they won't have a Bentley
Nov 6, 2016, 12:14 PM
|
|
Their Oline is going to get that kid killed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
It'll be more like Ralph Nader's Corvair--
Nov 6, 2016, 4:03 PM
|
|
"Unsafe At Any Speed"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2279
Joined: 9/21/11
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 12:56 PM
|
|
Bentley has been sacked 12 times in 3 games!!! 12 times!!! Clemson's D is gonna live in their backfield. We seriously may have 8-10 sacks in that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93661]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95412
Joined: 12/25/09
|
THERE'S ONE IMPORTING THING TO KNOW ABOUT THIS.
Nov 6, 2016, 12:59 PM
|
|
USuCk has no bandwagon fans, these comments come from guys who have followed football for a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5021]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 8274
Joined: 12/9/12
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 1:14 PM
|
|
Just don't understand how you can categorize a kid that's played 3 defenses with ZERO pulse and compare to a Heisman hopeful. The kid hasn't even played a road game yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 1:46 PM
|
|
So the Coots are going to go 6-6 and go to the do do bowl.
I seen more Coot gear around town yesterday than I have in 3 years.
I asked a dude at the gas station did woman's BB start up.
You could tell he was a Coot even without the Coot gear from head to toe.
He said not yet but the #### football team is BACK.
I about p issed my pants laughing and then he said we going to make DW wish he never said what he said.
I just shook my head and said OK buddy .
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10209]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 18310
Joined: 2/20/09
|
feel same way about killary and
Nov 6, 2016, 2:13 PM
|
|
Her supporters
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5225]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4634
Joined: 10/28/02
|
They are back like cooked crack! Silly cOOts!***
Nov 6, 2016, 3:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: It only took 3 wins over horrible teams for USuCk
Nov 6, 2016, 3:53 PM
|
|
He has been good but to compare to DW is just ignorant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 104
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
