Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Sorry for your loss in the senate Mike Lee, Rand Paul
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 20
| visibility 1

Sorry for your loss in the senate Mike Lee, Rand Paul


Jul 24, 2019, 6:50 AM

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-vote-9-11-first-responders-bill-tuesday-n1032831


badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Never run out? Like


Jul 24, 2019, 7:38 AM

Social Security? ;)

That's gonna attract 'reparations' folks like flies to honey. 'Never run out' has a nice ring to it.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

your racial connotations aside...


Jul 24, 2019, 7:47 AM

I am sure there will be some abuse. But if not for Stewart, McConnell never would have given the GOP senate members the OK to vote in favor of this. 2 months ago this would not have received a single vote from the GOP.

Lee and Paul where the only two to vote against this bill in the name of "fiscal responsibility"

I wonder, because I am too busy to look this up, if they voted in Favor of Trump's Tax Bill.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: your racial connotations aside...


Jul 24, 2019, 7:55 AM

Paul did because I’ve seen him called out on it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Trump's tax bill was revenue neutral


Jul 24, 2019, 8:00 AM

It was a sham basically, which we all know. Revenues did not drop at all. Deficits did increase because debt interest increased by a nearly identical amount. Of course the news you will read will blame Trump's tax "cuts". I'm lucky I didn't pay more because if not for child #3 to offset the loss of my mortgage deduction, I would have paid more in taxes.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


sham?


Jul 24, 2019, 8:45 AM

Far More people paid less taxes last year than the year before. The poor continued paying little to nothing.

As you referenced, total govt revenues increased due to increased positive economic activity.

If that’s a sham, I’ll take more shams.

This would be a good spot for a sham-wow pun, but it’s too early for me to think of one.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Trump's tax bill was revenue neutral


Jul 24, 2019, 9:18 AM [ in reply to Trump's tax bill was revenue neutral ]

corporate revenue is way down, payroll tax revenue is up. The two did not offset.

people making under 75k will actually see their taxes go up even higher than they were before in a couple of years.

our deficit spending is growing under trump, this is fact.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There it is..


Jul 24, 2019, 8:26 AM [ in reply to your racial connotations aside... ]

When Flowers, Snowflakes, lefties get their feelings hurt, play the race card, without justification.

That's a Socialistic Personification of a knitting pattern. Get fresh: get help from a Millennial.

The more we see of you on this board, the more I wonder why you haven’t been poisoned.

-Doc

2005_ncaa_champ.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've been wrong two times, but this isn't one of them.


The difference is


Jul 24, 2019, 7:54 AM [ in reply to Never run out? Like ]

unlike SS eventually there will be no more 9-11 survivors so the fund will die with them. The clock on slave reparations died with the last person born in bondage (what’s left is pandering). Now if you want to talk Jim Crow reparations, there are folks out there that still have a claim.

Glad they did the right thing. Veterans should be next.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Our solvency will die long before the last 911 first


Jul 24, 2019, 8:01 AM

responder dies.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Lol at "never run out". No way we stay solvent until 2092


Jul 24, 2019, 7:58 AM [ in reply to Never run out? Like ]

Heck, no way we stay solvent to 2042.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Sorry for your loss in the senate Mike Lee, Rand Paul


Jul 24, 2019, 8:48 AM

You act like most Republicans agreed. Hardly any did. Your "win" was one for the First Responders, not the politicians in office.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You disagreed with them?


Jul 24, 2019, 8:54 AM

Rand’s basic premise was “show me how we will pay for this and I’m all for it” and the left acts like he’s walking up to the WTC Memorial, unzipping his pants, and taking a giant rotating 360-degree hands-free whiz.

This would be akin to your wife coming home and saying “honey there are a lot of poor people in Detroit who need help—I’m going to give a debit card from our account to the local soup kitchen to use when they need funding”, and then somehow you becoming the poor-hating diiick when you ask where the money is coming from.

If this makes Rand an a-hole, we need a lot more a-holes.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: You disagreed with them?


Jul 24, 2019, 8:58 AM

I am not sure that this is the fight, that you want to fight though. I think the fight comes in entitlements, and military and medicare/medicaid cuts. I do not think this is the fight in order to keep your head above water and get reelected.

I get what you are saying 100% and I like Rand and his stances, however, this isn't the issue to to fight.



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


One of the reasons I’m a Rand Paul fan is that he will die on a


Jul 24, 2019, 10:44 AM

politically unpopular hill.

There’s always a reason to spend more money. Oppose military spending and he’s against the troops. Oppose entitlements and he’s against the poor or old. Oppose Dep of Ed spending and he doesn’t care about the children. Always, always something. He just wants us to be responsible. Apparently that’s too much to ask.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Why don't you turn all that nasty on the...


Jul 24, 2019, 9:47 AM

people who inflicted all this misery, pain and death on Americans? How about just condemning congressional support for the 'some people did something,' comment?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why don't you turn all that nasty on the...


Jul 24, 2019, 9:48 AM

you mean Saudis, yes I agree we should turn our back on that country..

and Lee and Paul are just grandstanding, this will hurt them come election season.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why don't you turn all that nasty on the...


Jul 24, 2019, 12:25 PM [ in reply to Why don't you turn all that nasty on the... ]

Yes, a congress woman who got quoted saying something you take out of context and overexaggerate to fit your own biased personal narrative is the villain and not the country that spawned and supported the terrorist(The Saudis).

Why are you not mad at all the congress people that continue to support that country? Why not the president who bends over for them to take it on the regular from them?

No, some freshman congress person said something... HOLY #### HOW CAN WE SURVIVE THAT. THE HORROR OF IT ALL.

That makes perfect sense. I am glad you are here to show us all where we should direct our angry. To think I was confused and thought the terrorist and the people that spawned and paid for them were the bad guys.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Can someone explain this fund?


Jul 24, 2019, 10:40 AM

I assume that all of the organizations involved...police, fire fighters, etc....have a program in place for those who get injured on the job. Does this fund include other people? Are their injuries not covered? Is it because those services were overwhelmed? How many people does it impact?

If it’s in the article just tell me and I’ll read it there. I don’t know if this program is necessary or not, but a Jon Steward plea doesn’t move the needle for me.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


remember the original $7 billion dollar 911 fund?


Jul 24, 2019, 10:46 AM

The one that had the money distributed so efficiently and flawlessly? It’ll be just like that, except limitless.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


$10 billion over the next decade...to fund what, exactly, and


Jul 24, 2019, 11:11 AM

for how many people?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Replies: 20
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic