Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort frog-marched from
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 43
| visibility 462

Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort frog-marched from


Jun 15, 2018, 12:11 PM

the courtroom for witness tampering and is heading to prison with a trial date of July 25th.

Cohen has a court date today as well.

Now we know why Trump was so agitated this morning.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

that or


Jun 15, 2018, 12:17 PM

high up FBI agents were actively working to take trump down? That might be disturbing.

nah, that cant be it.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


So, just to confirm,


Jun 8, 2017, 10:06 PM

the Deep State just got deeper, as it now includes the Inspector General.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

huh? I'm talking about the agents text


Jun 15, 2018, 12:26 PM

"[Trump is] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Page, who also worked on Mueller's staff, responded.

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok texted back.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


thats just lockerroom talk***


Jun 15, 2018, 12:26 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: huh? I'm talking about the agents text


Jun 15, 2018, 12:29 PM [ in reply to huh? I'm talking about the agents text ]

xtiger said:

"[Trump is] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Page, who also worked on Mueller's staff, responded.

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok texted back.



He should be fired for being so ineffective, not only did Struk not stop Trump from being President, the FBI helped him be President.

Life is strange, the Reps love complaining about the FBI in-spite of their overt help.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well, the IG Report released yesterday said no.


Jun 15, 2018, 12:21 PM [ in reply to that or ]

So there's that.

Bummer for you guys, I know.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

did you read the report?


Jun 15, 2018, 12:26 PM

or only the headline in the New York Times?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


haha, beat me to it!!***


Jun 15, 2018, 12:27 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Did you need for me to cut and past it for you?


Jun 15, 2018, 1:32 PM [ in reply to did you read the report? ]

I'm going to let you go find it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

paste


Jun 15, 2018, 1:37 PM

ees



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-willmo.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




Cat on a tin roof, dogs in a pile,
Nothin' left to do but smile, smile, smile!!!!


no, it said it has no hard proof


Jun 15, 2018, 12:27 PM [ in reply to Well, the IG Report released yesterday said no. ]

to correlate these anti-trump tweets to actions. Which of course is almost impossible to prove.

BUT any 6 yr old child can see what is giong on here.

"[Trump is] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Page, who also worked on Mueller's staff, responded.

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok texted back.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


So, just to confirm,


Jun 15, 2018, 12:48 PM

(again), neither of these two FBI agents had the ability to stop Trump from becoming President, or had a say in what was investigated, and how and when, and both were removed from Mueller's team when he discovered the relationship, BUUUUT...it's obvious even to a 6 year old that the partisanship between these two inconsequential people extends to the entire Bureau. Anybody can see that. Except that it's impossible to prove. But still. It's obvious.

Yes?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So, just to confirm,


Jun 15, 2018, 11:18 PM

No one is saying the entire bureau is anything like Strzok and Page. They were not inconsequential and were part of a larger scheme, which included even more powerful members of the US government, who were intent on preventing a Trump Presidency and are still working to delegitimize President Trump. They are all dead men (and women) walking.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No one other than the sitting president and all his lackeys?***


Jun 16, 2018, 8:26 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: No one other than the sitting president and all his lackeys?***


Jun 16, 2018, 9:42 AM

You wouldn't objectively analyze the statements of any Trump supporter anyway so what are your comments matter?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh I disagree, sir. What is they matter indeed.***


Jun 16, 2018, 10:44 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: no, it said it has no hard proof


Jun 15, 2018, 3:01 PM [ in reply to no, it said it has no hard proof ]

xtiger said:

to correlate these anti-trump tweets to actions. Which of course is almost impossible to prove.

BUT any 6 yr old child can see what is giong on here.

"[Trump is] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Page, who also worked on Mueller's staff, responded.

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok texted back.



What any 6 yr old child can see is that once again, a Trump supporter uses the "what about" argument to avoid criticism of Trump and his campaign.

Nice job. Very effective way to change the subject from Trump's campaign manager going to jail to FBI conspiracy.

What about the FBI, what about Hillary, what about....etc,etc, etc.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: no, it said it has no hard proof


Jun 15, 2018, 11:11 PM

How long was Manafort a part of Trump's team and how much of a contribution did he make to Trump's win? What is Manafort going to prison for? How long ago did those misdeeds happen? How did it remotely affect the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election? If you can answer these questions you should be able to see that Trump's former campaign manager going to jail pales in comparison to what non elected bureaucrats did in an attempt to assure Hillary Clinton would be President.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

500+ pages of (IG) reporting with FBI texts, emails,. etc...


Jun 15, 2018, 2:27 PM [ in reply to that or ]

Not one single time do they mention a Trump-Russia FBI investigation. Shut it down.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 500+ pages of (IG) reporting with FBI texts, emails,. etc...


Jun 15, 2018, 2:28 PM

Ummm, that is patently untrue. What he found was there was no political bias in the investigation of Clinton or Russia investigations.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Lock Him Up!


Jun 15, 2018, 12:27 PM

.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-conservativealex.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


He was agitated because he read the IG report.


Jun 15, 2018, 12:58 PM

Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Apparently, he got a lot done in a short amount of time.


Jun 15, 2018, 1:06 PM

Manafort down. Cohen up next.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Enough for Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity to proclaim


Jun 15, 2018, 2:12 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Enough for Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity to proclaim


Jun 15, 2018, 2:27 PM

Dang Chuck, that was then, this is now! You gotta be flexible in your truths if you want to survive in politics!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Enough for Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity to proclaim


Jun 15, 2018, 11:21 PM [ in reply to Enough for Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity to proclaim ]

Yet he did nothing illegal in regards to his work for the Trump campaign.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Enough for Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity to proclaim


Jun 15, 2018, 11:21 PM [ in reply to Enough for Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity to proclaim ]

Yet he did nothing illegal in regards to his work for the Trump campaign.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Apparently, he got a lot done in a short amount of time.


Jun 16, 2018, 1:48 AM [ in reply to Apparently, he got a lot done in a short amount of time. ]

And still no Russian collusion.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The investigation isnt limited to collusion.***


Jun 16, 2018, 8:42 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The investigation isnt limited to collusion.***


Jun 16, 2018, 9:46 AM

Was that not the original charter or mission statement from Rosensteinerstein? Even though he has broad powers it was given for the purpose of finding Russian, I repeat, Russian collusion with whoever it may have been.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 7:06 AM [ in reply to He was agitated because he read the IG report. ]

actually it was 5, I love how that number keeps getting smaller. Trump even said yesterday it was 44 days, when it was 149.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wasn’t he just a volunteer?***


Jun 16, 2018, 8:41 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 9:20 AM [ in reply to "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. " ]

He was campaign manager for 3 months. He was promoted May 19, gone on August 19.


Message was edited by: Clemsonfan1851®


2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 9:56 AM

More of a low level coffee boy, really.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 10:05 AM

I wouldn't say that.

Just pointing out that he was only campaign chairman for three months.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 12:14 PM

correction, he was hired March 29th when he was named campaign convention manager, Fired August 19th.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 1:24 PM

Campaign convention manager isn't the same as campaign chairman.

He was PROMOTED May 19 to chairman. Gone August 19.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 2:25 PM

I never would have figured that out

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 2:47 PM

Maybe not since you tried correcting the above poster about the three months when his statement was correct.

??

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 2:01 PM [ in reply to Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. " ]


He was campaign manager for 3 months. He was promoted May 19, gone on August 19.


Message was edited by: Clemsonfan1851®




but he joined the campaign on March 29th and began work on delegates to the convention.

“Paul is a great asset and an important addition as we consolidate the tremendous support we have received in the primaries,” Trump - March 29, 2016

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 2:55 PM

No one is denying that he worked with campaign for five months, Felix.

Just that he was only chairman for 3 months, May 19 to Aug 19.

There is a difference.

Even the quote you use says "promoted." Promoted would mean he already worked with the campaign.

You're too smart not to know the difference

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 9:53 AM [ in reply to "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. " ]

It really doesn't matter does it? All accusation that Manafort or any other Trump campaign member enlisted the help of Russian operatives to defeat Hillary Clinton is nothing more than rumor, gossip, innuendo, etc. and from second hand sources and unverifiable.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Manafort was his campaign manager for 3 months btw. "


Jun 16, 2018, 2:03 PM


It really doesn't matter does it? All accusation that Manafort or any other Trump campaign member enlisted the help of Russian operatives to defeat Hillary Clinton is nothing more than rumor, gossip, innuendo, etc. and from second hand sources and unverifiable.




That's called "contempt prior to investigation". You simply don't know. You can think, you can guess and you can hope.

But at this stage of the game you or I simply have no idea what, if anything has been found.

You're a Trump supporter, I get that. But you can't claim 'no collusion' anymore than I can claim proof of 'collusion'.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 43
| visibility 462
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic