|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Who is/was a better college player?
Nov 3, 2016, 9:08 PM
|
|
Adam Humphries or Hunter Renfrow? What say you?
|
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Renfrow***
Nov 3, 2016, 9:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4302]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3764
Joined: 11/18/03
|
You must be from Chicago....
Nov 3, 2016, 9:18 PM
|
|
Vote early, vote often! ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Renfrow***
Nov 3, 2016, 9:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2081]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2407
Joined: 9/4/16
|
Re: Renfrow******
Nov 3, 2016, 9:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Who is/was a better college player?
Nov 3, 2016, 9:16 PM
|
|
Adam never caught 2 TDs in the Natty .
Kind of hard to work around that stay if you're in the Humphries camp .
Love them both though , both are bigtime ballers .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3865]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 4973
Joined: 11/29/04
|
Adam is/was a much better blocker
Nov 3, 2016, 9:18 PM
|
|
Mainly because he's bigger and stronger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Renfrow still just a sophomore
Nov 3, 2016, 10:34 PM
|
|
Not sure that Adam was bigger and stronger at the same point.
Never the less, I'm. A big fan of both!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7114]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7324
Joined: 11/30/98
|
And size is ALL AH has on HR
Nov 3, 2016, 10:35 PM
[ in reply to Adam is/was a much better blocker ] |
|
When it comes to good hands, route running, overall innate football skills, I'd take Hunter in the college game 7 days a week. In the NFL I'm afraid he won't have enough size to make a team. Humphries is doing ok, but he isn't another Edelman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2883]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2225
Joined: 3/7/06
|
That's an easy one...
Nov 3, 2016, 9:41 PM
|
|
#13 of course! 
Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2877]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3857
Joined: 11/19/11
|
Re: Who is/was a better college player?
Nov 3, 2016, 9:41 PM
|
|
All I know is keep a walk on receiver in #13
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1298
Joined: 1/4/04
|
Re: Who is/was a better college player?
Nov 3, 2016, 9:55 PM
|
|
Renfrow, and it's not even close. As for PRO prospects though, different story. Adam has secured himself as a #2 WR (NOT easy) but I'm not sure Hunter's lack of size will allow him to do the same. I hope I'm wrong!!
GO TIGERS!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
I agree with you on all of that. That said..
Nov 3, 2016, 10:17 PM
|
|
Humphries is listed at 194 at 5 ft 11. Renfrow is listed at 5 ft 10 and 175. Is it possible for Renfrow to put on 20 lbs before he graduates?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1239]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1922
Joined: 10/25/15
|
Renfrow.
Nov 3, 2016, 10:20 PM
|
|
He's kinda like Rudy, but Renfrow can actually play ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1714]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2492
Joined: 10/14/11
|
Re: Renfrow.
Nov 4, 2016, 12:52 AM
|
|
Rudy was offsides
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1123]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1102
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Who is/was a better college player?
Nov 3, 2016, 10:36 PM
|
|
jmo but Adam was underused, he always seemed to get open but but not thrown too as much
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20540]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11682
Joined: 10/15/02
|
Re: Who is/was a better college player?
Nov 4, 2016, 1:03 AM
|
|
> Adam Humphries or Hunter Renfrow? What say you?
Renfrow...by a lot. Humphries is pretty durn good, obviously, or he wouldn't have won a starting gig with the Bucs.
Renfrow, though, is a better athlete. He's faster, can contort his body to make circus catches Humphries never thought about making, he's much more sudden into and out of his breaks. His ability to track and adjust to the thrown ball is also amazing. It's a testament to Clemson's depth we absorbed Renfrow's loss in a couple games this season without much dropoff but the second he was back in it was obvious how much he brings to the table.
Renfrow's a guy who could catch 75 or 100 balls, easily, at the next level. He could probably catch that many at Clemson too but there's only one ball and it's going to be hard for any one receiver to amass those kind of stats with the ball being spread around the way it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
