Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Really? Coots are actually coming on here because
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 15
| visibility 1

Really? Coots are actually coming on here because


Jan 7, 2013, 9:43 PM

Alabama is winning?

Y'all are seriously pathetic.

BTW, first year Texas A&M has already accomplished more than y'all have your entire time in the SEC.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Don't know where you get that, unless you mean the Heisman


Jan 7, 2013, 9:44 PM

winner cause other than that, they haven't done anything SC hasn't done.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You mean like beating the #1 team in the country


Jan 7, 2013, 9:49 PM

In their house no less?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

SC did beat Bama when they were no 1. It was probably


Jan 7, 2013, 9:51 PM

Garcia's only really good game.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: SC did beat Bama when they were no 1. It was probably


Jan 7, 2013, 9:51 PM

That was in Columbia, not Tuscaloosa.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bama lost three that year too


Jan 7, 2013, 10:17 PM

its not like USuC was the only ones to beat them. that was a good win for them though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

now bobcobb, don't let facts get in the way of his stories


Jan 7, 2013, 10:19 PM [ in reply to Re: SC did beat Bama when they were no 1. It was probably ]

it makes him feel bad and all, when he really knows that a&m has already surpassed usuc in the sec hierarchy, and there is nothing they can do about it. they had better just worry about mizzou surpassing them,too. there isn't too much farther usuc can fall in the sec pecking order, before kentucky starts breathing down their neck!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Don't know where you get that, unless you mean the Heisman


Jan 7, 2013, 9:52 PM [ in reply to Don't know where you get that, unless you mean the Heisman ]

OK OK then Texas A&M did almost as much in their first year as you COOTS have done in 20 years in the SEC!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I can agree to that.***


Jan 7, 2013, 9:52 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How about winning a bowl game before 100 years of football!***


Jan 7, 2013, 9:52 PM [ in reply to Don't know where you get that, unless you mean the Heisman ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: PLUS


Jan 7, 2013, 9:55 PM

A&M beat BAMA when they were #1 and BAMA will end up still #1!!! When USuCk lucked up and beat BAMA didn't BAMA go on to lose 2 more times and were NO where NEAR #1 at the end!!! SO SUCK IT COOT!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Also,


Jan 7, 2013, 9:58 PM

As long as Nick Saban is the coach the coots will never sniff an SEC championship. Ball Sack will retire before Saban will.

So I'm not sure why coots root for Alabama.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


twentyseven seventeen


Jan 7, 2013, 10:13 PM

loooooooozer

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ironic that you're on a rival's site calling someone a loser***


Jan 7, 2013, 10:19 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I am pretty sure that game was in the past....


Jan 7, 2013, 10:21 PM [ in reply to twentyseven seventeen ]

which makes it history. I thought coots didn't deal in history? If we are gonna discuss history, however, I got a few numbers for you!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: twentyseven seventeen


Jan 7, 2013, 10:23 PM [ in reply to twentyseven seventeen ]

I remember when I was 15.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 15
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic