Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...
Oct 22, 2012, 7:43 AM
|
|
I'm sure it has been discussed ad-nauseum, but a guy in my section said if your feet are completely wrapped up they blow the play dead because you are vulnerable and can't defend yourself... Is this true or does anyone else have a better explanation?
Dumb rule if true....
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...
Oct 22, 2012, 7:49 AM
|
|
Without looking it up, I can't say yes or no definitively. It does sound reasonable, though. He was basically teed up for a David Dunham-like blow-up. There just happened not to be anyone with a head of steam to light him up.
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [332]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 935
Joined: 8/6/07
|
Yep, judgement call
Oct 22, 2012, 7:49 AM
|
|
The Ref made a judgement call and called him in the grass. Meaning he thought it was dangerous for the play to continue and blew it dead to protect the QB. I'm shocked it happened.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Obviously, the ref was focused on the QB and wasn't
Oct 22, 2012, 7:53 AM
|
|
surveying the field. He saw how immobile Thomas was and quickly blew the play dead. After seeing the bigger picture, he may have regretted it.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
That's definitely something you don't see everyday
Oct 22, 2012, 7:58 AM
|
|
VT guy behind us was LIVID - as I am sure I would have been too.
Unfortunately he was a nice guy until that point, then he quickly turned into a real a-hole
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1081]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 2072
Joined: 1/29/11
|
A new one for TNet dictionary "in the grass" ;-)
Oct 22, 2012, 8:54 AM
[ in reply to Yep, judgement call ] |
|
aren't all the players in/on the grass? :-O
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13888]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10641
Joined: 9/15/02
|
Squeaky Watson sure was***
Oct 22, 2012, 10:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10137
Joined: 6/27/07
|
yeah i was dumbfounded...i'd be pissed if that was Tahj's
Oct 22, 2012, 8:00 AM
|
|
play that was taken away. I thought they blew it dead too quickly...i'll take it but I would be royally pist if that was flipped and we were down and just converted a big 3rd down.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
You can't have it both ways.....
Oct 22, 2012, 8:23 AM
|
|
There are all sorts of rules in place that were created in order to keep the QB safer and less likely to get injured, so you can't be in favor of or benefit from those and then complain about a rare "in the grasp" type call.
That said, had this been called on the Clemson, QB it would have agitated me just like it did the VT fans.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6653
Joined: 9/1/11
|
Re: You can't have it both ways.....
Oct 22, 2012, 8:41 AM
|
|
How many times have we had to endure BS calls?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
With ACC officials, it's always a very real possibility....
Oct 22, 2012, 9:01 AM
|
|
and the one-eyed blind men who officiated Saturday's game were pretty bad. They even managed to completely botch replay reviews. I think they got every review wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
You're right...........if a Clemson LB had levelled Thomas
Oct 22, 2012, 10:05 AM
[ in reply to You can't have it both ways..... ] |
|
while he was basically in the grasp and defenseless, the LB would've gotten a personal foul flag.
Truly, you can't have it both ways. Either you protect the QB or you don't.
There are a number of "judgement" calls every game by officials, both teams AND FANBASES just have to live with them.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...
Oct 22, 2012, 9:43 AM
|
|
My viewpoint is: If the refs don't stop the play, then we end LT's season with a vicious hit - VT fans (and Dinich) would be making lots of noise about that. The refs made the correct call even though there was nobody close enough to hit LT. The refs had no way to know that LT could get rid of the ball soon enough.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67822]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115461
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...
Oct 22, 2012, 10:07 AM
|
|
Looked like an NFL call. They are big on in the grasp and protecting the qb
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11913
Joined: 9/23/01
|
Re: You can't have it both ways.....
Oct 22, 2012, 10:25 AM
|
|
I thought it was in the grass. LoL
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [311]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 293
Joined: 11/8/10
|
Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...
Oct 22, 2012, 11:04 AM
|
|
any one have a good pic of that sack?
EDIT: .... Hmmm sounded fine in my head
Any one have a good picture of Logan Thomas's sack?
EDIT: No no that's not it either
Message was edited by: zdonaldsmith®
Message was edited by: zdonaldsmith®
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7980]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22420
Joined: 2/27/02
|
after watching the replay, that was borderline
Oct 22, 2012, 11:12 AM
|
|
the ref blew the whistle as he was spinning
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|