Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 16
| visibility 1

the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...


Oct 22, 2012, 7:43 AM

I'm sure it has been discussed ad-nauseum, but a guy in my section said if your feet are completely wrapped up they blow the play dead because you are vulnerable and can't defend yourself... Is this true or does anyone else have a better explanation?


Dumb rule if true....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...


Oct 22, 2012, 7:49 AM

Without looking it up, I can't say yes or no definitively. It does sound reasonable, though. He was basically teed up for a David Dunham-like blow-up. There just happened not to be anyone with a head of steam to light him up.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




The definition of awesome!


Yep, judgement call


Oct 22, 2012, 7:49 AM

The Ref made a judgement call and called him in the grass. Meaning he thought it was dangerous for the play to continue and blew it dead to protect the QB. I'm shocked it happened.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Obviously, the ref was focused on the QB and wasn't


Oct 22, 2012, 7:53 AM

surveying the field. He saw how immobile Thomas was and quickly blew the play dead. After seeing the bigger picture, he may have regretted it.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




The definition of awesome!


That's definitely something you don't see everyday


Oct 22, 2012, 7:58 AM

VT guy behind us was LIVID - as I am sure I would have been too.

Unfortunately he was a nice guy until that point, then he quickly turned into a real a-hole

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A new one for TNet dictionary "in the grass" ;-)


Oct 22, 2012, 8:54 AM [ in reply to Yep, judgement call ]

aren't all the players in/on the grass? :-O

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Squeaky Watson sure was***


Oct 22, 2012, 10:00 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

yeah i was dumbfounded...i'd be pissed if that was Tahj's


Oct 22, 2012, 8:00 AM

play that was taken away. I thought they blew it dead too quickly...i'll take it but I would be royally pist if that was flipped and we were down and just converted a big 3rd down.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You can't have it both ways.....


Oct 22, 2012, 8:23 AM

There are all sorts of rules in place that were created in order to keep the QB safer and less likely to get injured, so you can't be in favor of or benefit from those and then complain about a rare "in the grasp" type call.

That said, had this been called on the Clemson, QB it would have agitated me just like it did the VT fans.




2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: You can't have it both ways.....


Oct 22, 2012, 8:41 AM

How many times have we had to endure BS calls?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

With ACC officials, it's always a very real possibility....


Oct 22, 2012, 9:01 AM

and the one-eyed blind men who officiated Saturday's game were pretty bad. They even managed to completely botch replay reviews. I think they got every review wrong.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


You're right...........if a Clemson LB had levelled Thomas


Oct 22, 2012, 10:05 AM [ in reply to You can't have it both ways..... ]

while he was basically in the grasp and defenseless, the LB would've gotten a personal foul flag.

Truly, you can't have it both ways. Either you protect the QB or you don't.

There are a number of "judgement" calls every game by officials, both teams AND FANBASES just have to live with them.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...


Oct 22, 2012, 9:43 AM

My viewpoint is: If the refs don't stop the play, then we end LT's season with a vicious hit - VT fans (and Dinich) would be making lots of noise about that. The refs made the correct call even though there was nobody close enough to hit LT. The refs had no way to know that LT could get rid of the ball soon enough.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...


Oct 22, 2012, 10:07 AM

Looked like an NFL call. They are big on in the grasp and protecting the qb

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-74tiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You can't have it both ways.....


Oct 22, 2012, 10:25 AM

I thought it was in the grass. LoL

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: the "sack" on Logan Thomas-Dinnich...


Oct 22, 2012, 11:04 AM

any one have a good pic of that sack?


EDIT: .... Hmmm sounded fine in my head

Any one have a good picture of Logan Thomas's sack?

EDIT: No no that's not it either


Message was edited by: zdonaldsmith®


Message was edited by: zdonaldsmith®


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


after watching the replay, that was borderline


Oct 22, 2012, 11:12 AM

the ref blew the whistle as he was spinning

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 16
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic