»
Topic: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points
Replies: 71   Last Post: Jan 25, 2015 8:41 AM by: ALLIN4CU®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 71  

the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points

[2]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:27 PM
 

scored at 20. Really? I'm sorry, I have to take umbrage with that assessment. I'll take any kind of bet you want that we score more than 20.

and yes, that includes a "go away and never come back" bet if that is the consensus among responders to this thread.


Well, go away and never come back

[2]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:29 PM
 

COOT

2019 student level member

Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:29 PM
 

Ok ok. 21 points


This is such a silly thing to say.

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:30 PM
 

What is the purpose of this wager? Why can't you just say that you think they will score more than 20? To show that you REALLY REALLY think they will score more than 20?


If you are looking for a consensus...


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:30 PM
 

On tiger football from this place, you are even dumber than I thought.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: If you are looking for a consensus...

[2]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:38 PM
 

OK I stand corrected, I just read David Hood's article and figured that was the general feeling of the forum. OK, no wager.

I will say this, for the last few years there hasn't been a doubt in my mind that we would win. This year I have no idea what's going to happen except that I think like most that it is going to be very close and decided by turnovers which is the only thing that really gives me hope because as bad as our defense is, it isn't totally inept at creating turnovers. It's practically the only way we ever stop anyone.


It may indeed come down to a late field goal.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:11 PM
 

Which one of us can split the uprights when it's tight?

And since that Gamecock fan with the fat $$@ already did that to the girl in the South Carolina tailgating video, I'd say it's our turn.

q8^)


Re: It may indeed come down to a late field goal.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:39 PM
 

pics or it didn't happen


Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 5:22 PM
 

It's on www.bustedcoverage.com. From September 29, 2014 at 6:05 pm. I'm not linking it.

...... somehow I think you honestly haven't seen it ......


Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 5:39 PM
 

lol, nope I honestly had not seen it, hey at least it was good ole hetero action and not with another boy

or a farm animal, amirite??


Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 5:45 PM
 

I would like to know how you believe Scar will move the ball? Do you believe the running game is on Par with Ga Tech? Honestly, GA St. has a better passing game according to the stats.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 5:56 PM
 

I believe our offense is on par with UGA's (who scored *significantly* more than 20)

I believe that because it is


Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 5:58 PM
 

You don't have anywhere close to the running game Georgia has! If you can say you guys do and keep a straight face then you my friend need to be a professional poker player!

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 26, 2014 10:47 AM
 

> You don't have anywhere close to the running game
> Georgia has! If you can say you guys do and keep a
> straight face then you my friend need to be a
> professional poker player!

I guess I missed the part where "running game" = "offense". UGA has a little more rushing attack than we do, we have a little more passing. We are currently ranked #26 and #27 respectively in total offense, so I'm right.


Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 6:06 PM
 

And to build on that, you guys only average 58 more yards per game then Clemson! 58! Both teams have played 4 teams currently in the top 25 in total Defense. Clemson is 3-1 against those teams and ScAr is 3-1. The biggest difference is that Clemson played 3 of those teams with a 2nd string QB and the other was when Cole was the "starter."

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Nope. You go find it.


Posted: Nov 26, 2014 11:06 AM
 

UGA's offense scored 17 points in 3 (and change) quarters. After the defense got Stoudted again and again. Also missing two starters on the side UGA scored 14 of those late points on. How confident are you in your 4th quarter game this year?


Probably not too as of late..............***


Posted: Jan 24, 2015 9:54 PM
 



2019 white level member

Re: If you are looking for a consensus...


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:23 PM
 

I usually have a feeling in how a game is going to go, but not this year. I had us pegged to win last year and would have without all the turnovers. I just don't know this year. I keep weighing the strength of our defense versus the weakness of our offense. At least our strength plays across yours.

> OK I stand corrected, I just read David Hood's
> article and figured that was the general feeling of
> the forum. OK, no wager.
>
> I will say this, for the last few years there hasn't
> been a doubt in my mind that we would win. This year
> I have no idea what's going to happen except that I
> think like most that it is going to be very close and
> decided by turnovers which is the only thing that
> really gives me hope because as bad as our defense
> is, it isn't totally inept at creating turnovers.
> It's practically the only way we ever stop anyone.


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:30 PM
 

I agree. I think y'all will put up around 24-27 I think it really depends on how we execute offensively.


^Beat me to it.***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:32 PM
 



2019 student level member


SC scores in the mid-20's. You don't break 30, however.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:31 PM
 

It's just a matter of if Clemson can get the O going without Watson, if he doesn't play.

2019 student level member


You may not need to score 20 to win if Watson cannot play.***

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:32 PM
 




Doesn't matter it WON'T be enough.Tigers Stop the Streak!***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:33 PM
 




14-17 is all you need.***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:33 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

Re: 14-17 is all you need.***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:13 PM
 

14-17 is all you GET !

COOTs don't get friends this week.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

DB23


Calicoot


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:37 PM
 

Calicock is a delusional doofus coot ! Go away to FGF where you hang out and DON'T come back !!


Message was edited by: jester®


military_donation.jpg

Personally I don't think

[3]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:41 PM
 

Notre Dame will be able to contain the USC offense, so I think they'll put up around 38 or so.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

"IDIOT POSTER OF THE MONTH SO FAR...GWP-- You have won IPM Award for your failure to completely comprehend a clear post & then choose to attack someone who points out your ignorance. While you are not yet in the same No Class Catagory as deRoberts, ClemTiger117 & Tigerdug23, you are getting closer to the Sewer Dwellers." - coachmac


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:44 PM
 

How many did you score on Missouri and Florida? Yeah, that sounds about right.


I don't really give a ****how many points $CU scores.....


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 2:45 PM
 

as long as it's at least one less than Clemson scores.

Florida (11), Georgia (13), and Missouri (23) are the three best defenses $CU has faced so far this year.

$CU scored 38 at home against Georgia, 20 at home against Missouri, and just 23 (in OT) at Florida.

Clemson has the best defense, by far, that $CU has faced this season.




2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: I don't really give a ****how many points $CU scores.....


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:05 PM
 

Why are you even on this board dirtpecker ? Go back to your delusional fan base.

2019 purple level member


Wow...that's a first !!!***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:10 PM
 

null




2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


About time you were outed

[2]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:25 PM
 

;)

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I'm a grown man simply stating wise and true things.


All this time I though the subterfuge was successful***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:34 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: Wow...that's a first !!!***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:59 PM
 

I don't that was meant for you...

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Wow...that's a first !!!***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:28 PM
 

I think he was talking to you Big CU

I mean I guess he was, he responded to you. Right? Although why he would call you a "dirtpecker" escapes me...


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:21 PM
 

Deal...it's a consensus


The only concensus I have is the triumvirate of


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:39 PM
 

Me, myself and I. We all say the Tigers will be all up in the SCar backfield, and y'all will score 17 or less. Put me down for that.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Not 20...it's 17.***

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:41 PM
 



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 3:52 PM
 

..OK, I'll bite. Can you tell me exactly what you are basing on that tells you SCar's offense scores more than 20?

Let's look at Clemson's games this season...only 3 teams have scored over 20 points on Clemson's D this season. But you have to look further into that that than just a score.

UNC....scored 14 points in the 4th quarter vs Clemson's 2nd/3rd string guys...prior to the first team coming off the field, only had 28 points. Best you have to base on, though UNC QB is higher in QBR than SCar's.

GTech. Offense only scored 14 of the 28 points they had on Clemson. The other 14 were from 2 pick 6's off Stoudt.


UGA. 21 points with Gurley in the 4th quarter. 1st-3rd quarters combined, Clemson stayed within 3 points of UGA the whole game, and UGA only had 24 points (only 3 in the third from a FG...went into the half tied). It's their running gameplay with a fresh Gurley that let the 4th quarter get out of hand. SCar does not have a tandem of elite RB's of Gurley, Marshall, Chubb, and Michel to keep a "top RB in the nation Heisman hopeful" legs that fresh.

So, what tells you that SCar's offense can do what most teams this season haven't (including GT)?


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:34 PM
 

> ..OK, I'll bite. Can you tell me exactly what you
> are basing on that tells you SCar's offense scores
> more than 20?

well you pretty much made my point for me, I was going to say everything you just said...minus all the rationalization and spin of course. You guys think you're the best defense we've played all year and you may well be. Well, we think we're the best offense you've played all year and can make a case for that as well, just chock full of "well so and so might look bad but if you look deeper you'll see...." type analysis that I wouldn't bore my worst enemy with.


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points

[1]
Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:22 PM
 

You are just delusional if you think you break anything over 21. We will stop the run like we have the last few meetings and force DT to pass. He will be running around like a little chicken with his head cut off in fear of getting broken in half. Your O line is not much different than ours, the difference comes down to us having an elite pass rush threat. Dylan will look more flustered than Tajh ever did and will throw at least 3 picks. Also, here's to hoping someone teabags that little pee wee herman looking QB of yours after we we make him eat dirt.


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:36 PM
 

> We will stop the run like we have
> the last few meetings and force DT to pass. He will
> be running around like a little chicken with his head
> cut off in fear of getting broken in half.

lol, yeah sure he will. Just like the last time he played you guys, he was so terrified...


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:40 PM
 

...not the same defense Cali. Or was Clemson's D ranked #1 last time Thompson played them? Better secondary and line this time around. But if we are on last time we played, what was Davis' rushing stats vs this line? I can't quite remember.


Looked pretty terrified to me on Saturday.***


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 6:05 PM
 



2019 student level member


I stopped reading at "I'm sorry".***


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:23 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

"I've played multiple sports and would bet any amount that I'm still more athletic than you at this present time...."


Calloused #### please riddle me this: Exactly how many times


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:36 PM
 

does it take before one does indeed go blind. TIA


Re: Calloused #### please riddle me this: Exactly how many times


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:37 PM
 

Completely? I don't know, I just did it until I needed glasses.


Had assumed you could still read considering you posted


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 4:41 PM
 

but your well-known story as we were told is that your mom caught you and screamed for you to stop, and you told her sure, but mom I'm over here. I figured she'd had told you that. my bad


Do you think you score more than 20 IF you don't recover any


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 9:06 PM
 

Turnovers or have any kicks returned for TD's?

IF , big IF, Clemson doesn't turn the ball over or give you kick return points, you will not score more than 20.

2019 white level member

I have no idea how many points the chickens will score.


Posted: Nov 25, 2014 9:12 PM
 

But I do know they have yet to face a defense like ours.


haha. Vic Beasley and crew say Hi

[3]
Posted: Nov 30, 2014 10:39 AM
 

Nm


I hope someone bet him his life savings on this one***


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 10:44 AM
 



2019 white level member

Re: I hope someone bet him his life savings on this one***


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 10:47 AM
 

And I bet he doesn't pay up

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

which would entail one lifesize poster of Spurrier, three

[1]
Posted: Nov 30, 2014 11:09 AM
 

buttons that say something about c0cks and a burger king uniform.


I LOL'd at that one.


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 3:03 PM
 

Thanks in arrears.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 10:45 AM
 

Did y'all score 20?

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 10:48 AM
 

No 17

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 10:54 AM
 

My point ;)

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

He's still working on counting, doesn't yet realize that

[1]
Posted: Nov 30, 2014 11:10 AM
 

17 is less than 20.


Re: He's still working on counting, doesn't yet realize that


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 2:06 PM
 

Help him count ;)

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

SEE YA!***


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 11:05 AM
 



2019 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

There's something in these hills.


CaliCock was right

[2]
Posted: Nov 30, 2014 2:45 PM
 

USC dropped 49 on Notre Dame....SCU, though, well we know how that played out.


Epitome of a poor loser


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 2:58 PM
 

Doesn't post for 2 months while they are losing, comes on here trolling and saying it's impossible to not score 20 on our defense.

And then hasn't shown back up


And we have orange-colored glasses. I hope you still show up on Tuesdays with your "TueSdaYs with Cali, guise!!!!!" crap to you can tell us all about the awesome offense that got you 6 wins. But I won't be surprised when you don't

2019 white level member

Don't let the door hit you............***


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 6:31 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 6:52 PM
 

Ill take any kind of bet that you like a DA about right now

2019 student level member

Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Nov 30, 2014 6:53 PM
 

Cali that is

2019 student level member

Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Jan 24, 2015 10:29 PM
 

And your da wouldve bet that this season too lol

2019 student level member

Great thread. Wood read again***


Posted: Jan 24, 2015 10:32 PM
 



"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Hahhaahahhahahahahaha***


Posted: Jan 24, 2015 10:36 PM
 



2019 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

There's something in these hills.


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Jan 24, 2015 10:38 PM
 

this is a fun thread

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Jan 25, 2015 8:38 AM
 

How about just go away and never come back capon!!


Re: the consensus here seems to put the ceiling on USC points


Posted: Jan 25, 2015 8:41 AM
 

Well "17" isn't quite "20" is it???

That is all....

Go Tigers!!

military_donation.jpg

Replies: 71  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
10407 people have read this post