|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [3233]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 4960
Joined: 11/3/06
|
who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 10:59 PM
|
|
I could swear that I saw them trying to rip it off in the pile.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [36207]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21509
Joined: 10/27/03
|
Wouldn't Surpise Me....They Have Always Been Dirty
Sep 1, 2012, 11:02 PM
|
|
With Chop Blocks and Late Hits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115417
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet? I dont
Sep 1, 2012, 11:02 PM
|
|
I know darn well they were
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [482]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 923
Joined: 2/24/07
|
You are correct
Sep 1, 2012, 11:02 PM
|
|
Got to do away with that rule. STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [115]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 195
Joined: 8/26/08
|
Re: You are correct
Sep 1, 2012, 11:12 PM
|
|
Gotta call a penalty for ripping the guys helmet off
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 201
Joined: 11/19/03
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:03 PM
|
|
That was evident the 1st time it came off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3405]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5216
Joined: 1/26/09
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:03 PM
|
|
Without a doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [225]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 474
Joined: 9/13/04
|
count me in agreement***
Sep 1, 2012, 11:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [864]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 3124
Joined: 12/8/11
|
Yes was watching from home and they were
Sep 1, 2012, 11:04 PM
|
|
Auburn has always had some nasty D Players...some clean ones though too
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9051]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 13813
Joined: 7/1/02
|
Of course they were to force him to sit out - that new.....
Sep 1, 2012, 11:04 PM
|
|
rule's got to be re-examined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2394]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 5533
Joined: 11/16/06
|
First thing I thought about is so what happens with the
Sep 1, 2012, 11:19 PM
|
|
clock running down in the National Championship, star QB X gets his helmet ripped off on third down, and they need to go for it on the big fourth down? Maybe they have put something in with the new rule that addresses a situation like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [85]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 71
Joined: 6/23/11
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:05 PM
|
|
I do!! There should be a n unnecessary roughness on the second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10343]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12798
Joined: 11/22/03
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:05 PM
|
|
I think if the players helmet comes off the guy that pulls it off should be penalized and made to sit out as well. I think the rule is stupid and just opens up a can of worms where more neck injuries will come from players trying to rip them off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73692
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:07 PM
|
|
agreed, that and the new kickoff rule are incredibly dumb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [323]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 302
Joined: 8/1/12
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:06 PM
|
|
First time was a facemask by a defender from behind (upper right side) and then the second time it was pulled off from the back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [679]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 773
Joined: 10/23/02
|
100% Correct
Sep 1, 2012, 11:06 PM
|
|
How is that not considered a facemask? They were twisting it off in the pile. Saw it at least twice. Brutal!
This new rule might have made football less safe.
Cole stepped up! AE23!
Can't Stop! Won't Stop!
Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [52020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22979
Joined: 10/10/11
|
Definitely
Sep 1, 2012, 11:07 PM
|
|
That rule is going to be controversial all year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2429]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3556
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:08 PM
|
|
The last time Boyd sat out for his helmet coming off you could see an eye problem. I bet a finger went in his eye when ripping off the helmet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [211]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 464
Joined: 10/16/11
|
They certainly were.***
Sep 1, 2012, 11:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [139]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 319
Joined: 9/7/09
|
Auburn D was poking his eye too, those dirty Blasters***
Sep 1, 2012, 11:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 134
Joined: 1/28/07
|
Re: who else thinks AU was targeting Boyd's helmet?
Sep 1, 2012, 11:14 PM
|
|
the season. May have to change the rule to exclude the QB. That can be a drive killer. You know it will become part of the game strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
Cheezit's dirty and his players are too.***
Sep 1, 2012, 11:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 134
Joined: 1/28/07
|
Definitely agree. We'll have to see how it plays out during
Sep 1, 2012, 11:15 PM
|
|
the season. May have to change the rule to exclude the QB. That can be a drive killer. You know it will become part of the game strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2394]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 5533
Joined: 11/16/06
|
Why wouldn't they try? When you have that uttlerly stupid
Sep 1, 2012, 11:17 PM
|
|
new rule in place about missing the next play, I would probably encourage it from our D also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1803]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2282
Joined: 1/20/10
|
For sure! stupid new rule.***
Sep 1, 2012, 11:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
