All-TigerNet [14189]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15283
Joined: 8/19/04
|
Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
emoji_events
[11]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:14 PM
|
|
Ole school ACC bulllshit, period.
|
|
|
 |
All-In [36503]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30871
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Which one???
[3]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:15 PM
|
|
ACC refs suck ballz.
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [115]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 274
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Which one???
[1]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:16 PM
|
|
Both
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [36503]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30871
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Re: Which one???
[1]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:20 PM
|
|
Both were criminal attempts by the ACC to give the win to BC. They had to settle for hoping getting XT out 1st half against ND will make the difference.
Swoffie must have a huge farewell performance bonu$$$ coming from ND if they make the CFP.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14189]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15283
Joined: 8/19/04
|
Re: Which one???
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:16 PM
|
|
Interception play by #24 in the first half.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1148]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1501
Joined: 8/22/99
|
Re: Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
emoji_events
[5]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:16 PM
|
|
First one was BS call, XT one was right call. Hate to lose XT for ND first half,
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14189]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15283
Joined: 8/19/04
|
Re: Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
[2]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:16 PM
|
|
Agree
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [13995]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7701
Joined: 12/1/18
|
Re: Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:16 PM
|
|
The officiating was ridiculous at times. Between it and Testi-cle, I didn’t have a good afternoon.
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [538]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 1371
Joined: 10/5/00
|
First one yes but second was textbook...***
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Team Captain [480]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 291
Joined: 10/10/08
|
Re: First one yes but second was textbook...***
[1]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:32 PM
|
|
i disagree, the 2nd one was a worse call if you ask me. XT jumps and leaves his feet to block the pass at the exact time the QB was releasing. His momentum carried him into the QB, so when XT left his feet the QB was not indefensible. And if you look closely both their heads were moving towards each other, negating targeting, in my opinion. But the call stood, so it is what it is.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3164]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3706
Joined: 1/25/17
|
Re: Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:21 PM
|
|
Agree! That was a ticky tack as it gets! He didn't even hit him in such a way one would say, "he could have possibly taken the QB out"! It was crazy!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2264]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3328
Joined: 1/3/14
|
Re: Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
[1]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 4:22 PM
|
|
They had a couple of chances at the end of the game to literally take the game away, and opted to not make the bogus call, so i give them a pass on outright corruption and will just call them blind as bats.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5076]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5617
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Roughing passer on interception play was nothing short of
[1]
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 7:50 PM
|
|
Wonderful take. But if they were just trying to have BC cover the spread, they DID accomplish that task.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1266]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 578
Joined: 7/23/01
|
Bless their sweet little hearts. Just glad no one was hurt
Posted: Oct 31, 2020, 5:06 PM
|
|
by someone tackling the QB. #pansya$$football
|
|
|
|
|
|