Replies: 10
| visibility 1,259
|
Devotee [330]
TigerPulse: 52%
Posts: 372
Joined: 7/28/14
|
This officiating needs to be talked about more
Nov 30, 2014, 9:05 AM
|
|
I'm sorry... I can't let it go.
1) Their refusal to review if DW scored on that scramble
2) The targeting call was absurd
3) The Fumble at the end of the game???? What the heck??? Please explain that
4) The onside kick???? The player was not calling for a fair catch. Again, absurd.
I know there is more..... but come on man. This thing looked like they were clearly trying to help the coots. I know we won the game. But something needs to be said!!
Suck on it coots!
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 3333
Joined: 9/29/11
|
Re: This officiating needs to be talked about more
Nov 30, 2014, 9:12 AM
|
|
All bad the fumble was the worst, but dude did call for a fair catch. Very heads up play.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2896]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 3530
Joined: 1/13/02
|
I agree and best to do it after dominating win. IT WAS AWFUL***
Nov 30, 2014, 9:21 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7659
Joined: 9/21/13
|
Re: This officiating needs to be talked about more
Nov 30, 2014, 9:25 AM
|
|
I was surprised by the non-review of the TD. Especially since they said "stands" instead of "confirmed" the footage had to be questionable at best so why not take the time to review it. I didn't see the fumble well from my seat so idk how clear it was but I know the SA ejection was just crap.
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [206]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 153
Joined: 6/29/14
|
Re: This officiating needs to be talked about more
Nov 30, 2014, 9:27 AM
|
|
If DW was at full strength we would have put 50 points on them.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2519]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3327
Joined: 8/23/02
|
onside kick call was correct, but the others were garbage
Nov 30, 2014, 9:31 AM
|
|
the ACC replay officials need to be canned, there are some blind fool idiots in the booth.
THe targeting calls are going to ruin football. There was a bad one in the Uva-VT game, where a guy hit with his face. But Sat's on Anthony was worse than the one on SMith at Wake.
And the non-review of the TD by DW, well. Giving coaches a challenge is useless, b/c they are basically challenging the replay official. He ain't ever going to overturn on a challenge b/c that is admitting he didn't do his job in the first place.
The non-fumble they were calling forward motion stopped. It was quicker than any whistle for forward motion stopped that I've seen, but fortunately it didn't matter to the outcome of the game.
The coaches need to revolt to the ACC office about the replay officials and targeting calls this offseason, though. That has to get better.
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 3333
Joined: 9/29/11
|
Re: onside kick call was correct, but the others were garbage
Nov 30, 2014, 9:42 AM
|
|
They were sec refs
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1163]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 967
Joined: 11/17/13
|
i agree....
Nov 30, 2014, 9:49 AM
[ in reply to onside kick call was correct, but the others were garbage ] |
|
The onside kick call was correct because the ball was kicked from the tee directly into the air. The ball was not kicked into the ground so the receiving team is given an opportunity to catch the ball. The receiver did not signal for a fair catch. He was slanting toward the sideline to reach for the ball. That makes no difference in the outcome. I was hoping that we would have kept the ball at that point because ewe had just seized momentum. We still won and did so in a pretty easy fashion.
I hate the targeting rule as it is way too subjective. The refs are calling targeting for hits by the defender's facemask or the side of their helmets. Isn't the rule specific that it is with the crown of the helmet? Also, I did see Anthony "launch" either. He basically leaned toward the QB and pushed him.
I am all for the refs having greater accountability which will increase the quality and efficiency of the officiating. Fine and/or suspend refs for missed calls. And please no political crap like that garbage that came out after Smith's targeting call. How can the poor officiating get fixed if those in power are too weak and sof to do anything about it?
Stepping off soap box now.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16506]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11655
Joined: 9/1/01
|
If you look at what is a legal tackle on almost every play
Nov 30, 2014, 9:52 AM
|
|
and then look at calling Anthony for "targeting", you have to realize how absurd that call was. You can regularly pound guys down, then throw a guy out for a push. MAYBE you can call it a late push and give the 15, but not an ejection. That protects no one.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6653
Joined: 9/1/11
|
Re: This officiating needs to be talked about more
Nov 30, 2014, 9:48 AM
|
|
Yeah I hate that officials always get a free pass with no penalties
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [386]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 556
Joined: 1/28/07
|
Re: This officiating needs to be talked about more
Nov 30, 2014, 10:02 AM
|
|
Agree except for the onside kick. There is a reason the kicker normally tops the ball so it hits the ground first. If it does not, the receiver must be given a chance to catch the ball. This is onside kick 101.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1,259
|
|
|