|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11175
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Maryland - Clemson Depth Charts
Oct 30, 2006, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6768]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 12494
Joined: 2/13/05
|
Grisham over Kelly? Lets hope he holds onto the ball
Oct 30, 2006, 11:07 AM
|
|
better than last week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [785]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 1803
Joined: 9/18/06
|
kelly couldnt catch either last week***
Oct 30, 2006, 11:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4277
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Kelly was playing defense.***
Oct 30, 2006, 11:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34582]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 41409
Joined: 4/20/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6768]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 12494
Joined: 2/13/05
|
thanks for your 2 cents, chief.
Oct 30, 2006, 11:12 AM
|
|
Did Grisham drop the ball when he could have caught it? Yes he did. Don't see how it is classless to point out facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [2861]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 4511
Joined: 9/4/03
|
It's a depth-chart
Oct 30, 2006, 11:15 AM
[ in reply to Really never a need to call out players...kinda classless*** ] |
|
What's on a depth chart?
What would discuss about the depth chart?
This isn't a hallmark card and we're not saying Grisham sucks (far from it) but I think Kelley should be above him too after last weeks performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34823]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 41036
Joined: 2/6/01
|
Hard to choose between the drops from either one. Kelly had
Oct 30, 2006, 11:12 AM
[ in reply to Grisham over Kelly? Lets hope he holds onto the ball ] |
|
some critical drops against Wake, and I understand he had a drop in VT game , too. Grisham fumbled against GT when he almost had his head torn off. VT DB's are hitters, and the way WP was scattering the ball around last week, they weren't too interested in exposing their ribs to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6768]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 12494
Joined: 2/13/05
|
Kelly did have some drops, but it seems like Grisham missed
Oct 30, 2006, 11:13 AM
|
|
balls when he was wide open, and the ball was thrown reasonably well. Kelly had to play d-back on several poor throws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [2861]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 4511
Joined: 9/4/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
The star of the future...
Oct 30, 2006, 11:22 AM
|
|
Time to get the ball to the speedster Jacoby Ford more often and start developing him more as a deep threat. He can even take bubble screens the distance if need be!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [503]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 1164
Joined: 11/26/05
|
We never threw a deep ball a game last week, the way the
Oct 30, 2006, 12:04 PM
|
|
safetys were up somebody please tell me why we did not throw a deep ball, I know this is last weeks game and Im not living in the past but thats elementary, when you have 9 and I mean a strong 9 in the box ALL NIGHT LONG you have to take a shot down field, Just a question boys? So dont blow up and get all on the defensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [194]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 199
Joined: 3/7/99
|
VT was in the backfield too quickly for Will to setup long***
Oct 30, 2006, 3:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1298]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2324
Joined: 2/26/02
|
Re: The star of the future.. NOW IS THE FUTURE
Oct 30, 2006, 6:35 PM
[ in reply to The star of the future... ] |
|
Agree he has the potential but it is time for the future to show up. He did a much better job catching punts last week. Still think we need a blocker back there with him. believe we need to use him on the reverse and swing passes. The over the middle Kelly pass is better to him than Kelly IMO. Kelly should be used more of a jump pass receiver like Gardner and Hamilton were. Then it is up to Proctor to get it there
Agree Kelly did a great job of preventing Ints last week.
We have to use the pass and not count on the run with the loss of Fry. We need to have a more diverse offense against Md, NCST and USC IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1903]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3519
Joined: 10/15/00
|
I haven't seen anybody metion that Hunter is listed as the
Oct 30, 2006, 12:10 PM
|
|
starter at TE that's good news.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1298]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2324
Joined: 2/26/02
|
Re: I haven't seen anybody metion that Hunter is listed as the
Oct 30, 2006, 6:36 PM
|
|
Yes and he gets wide open down the middle every game if Proctor could just see him more
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
