Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
The Rule of Law
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 31
| visibility 554

The Rule of Law


Dec 18, 2018, 10:05 AM

This is what the President of the United States says about a warrant issued by a Federal judge and executed by the FBI that resulted in the convictions of multiple felonies including bank fraud and income tax evasion. Think about that.

This guy is more dangerous by the day.


https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1074313153679450113

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Dat last line doe


Dec 18, 2018, 10:08 AM

"Why didn’t they break into the DNC to get the Server, or Crooked’s office?"

Watergate much?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like your funny words magic man


I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a


Dec 18, 2018, 10:13 AM

deal with him to plead guilty to campaign finance violations? Something no one has ever been FOUND guilty of in a court of law. And something Congress does all the time, and has done for years.

I hate to say it, but I think at this point Russian collusion is dead in the water and if they're betting on a payoff to a #### star to get impeachment through an untried campaign finance law, good luck with that.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


And how isn't Stormy guilt of blackmail?


Dec 18, 2018, 10:26 AM

Its pretty much what many said when it first started. They'll arrest some people on stuff that has nothing to do with collusion.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And how isn't Stormy guilt of blackmail?


Dec 18, 2018, 10:50 AM

other than there not being one shred of evidence of that?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There isn't?


Dec 18, 2018, 10:52 AM

Didn't she get paid off as hush money? Think Trump volunteered that, or she said she was going to talk unless he paid?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: There isn't?


Dec 18, 2018, 11:06 AM

The most obvious question is why have they filed a criminal complaint against her? The fact is that Cohen and Trump did approach her after they learned that she was talking to ABC about going public.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


that is a fact?


Dec 18, 2018, 11:51 AM

How do you know that?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well...I guess you don't***


Dec 18, 2018, 8:57 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: There isn't?


Dec 18, 2018, 11:07 AM [ in reply to There isn't? ]

jesus, you better get on the phone with Meuller's office detective, apparently those incompetent buffoons botched this one and could use your help.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a


Dec 18, 2018, 10:26 AM [ in reply to I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a ]

They cut deals usually when they get what they want from a defendant. They may know more than you think with the few deals they have already made.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It shows they want to go down the campaign finance


Dec 18, 2018, 10:30 AM

road with Trump getting Cohen to plead guilty to that specific charge. Looks bad for the chances of "Russian collusion".

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: It shows they want to go down the campaign finance


Dec 18, 2018, 10:38 AM

I am not worried if there was collusion or not. If there were any crimes I say bring them to light.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What ever it takes to make sure Trump is gone,right?***


Dec 18, 2018, 10:55 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Please, please, please keep him around another two years.


Dec 18, 2018, 11:17 AM

The voters need a constant reminder of just how badly things can go when you don't take your civic duty seriously.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

For realsies


Dec 18, 2018, 11:26 AM

the whole Dems are going to try and impeach him for paying off Stormy thing is laughable. A) There's no way 20 Republican Senators vote to convict on anything like that B) They'd lose 2020 votes.

Trump isn't getting impeached for anything short of collusion (smocking gun included) and this whole "the crimes we know about so far aren't that bad" argument is just for Trump supporters to feel better.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

back to keeping him around for reminders.


Dec 18, 2018, 11:52 AM [ in reply to Please, please, please keep him around another two years. ]

I think you said last week thats why the dems would want him there.

uh huh.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Trump is like barbed wire to the Republican Party.***


Dec 18, 2018, 12:25 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What ever it takes to make sure Trump is gone,right?***


Dec 18, 2018, 11:34 AM [ in reply to What ever it takes to make sure Trump is gone,right?*** ]

No, I want Trump to stay for the next 2 years. I just want his, or the people around him, to have their shadiness come to light if there is something. Why would any American with morals not want that? You would prefer that they can be as shady as they want and for everyone to turn a blind eye. That is odd.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a


Dec 18, 2018, 11:02 AM [ in reply to I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a ]

Tiggity® said:

deal with him to plead guilty to campaign finance violations? Something no one has ever been FOUND guilty of in a court of law. And something Congress does all the time, and has done for years.

I hate to say it, but I think at this point Russian collusion is dead in the water and if they're betting on a payoff to a #### star to get impeachment through an untried campaign finance law, good luck with that.



I have to disagree with your premise. The idea that "they" are counting on anything to impeach belies the fact that these are just criminal justice investigators doing their jobs. There is no "they" who are out to get Trump. If he broke laws, he'll be held accountable, if he didn't, he won't.

The biggest lie coming out of the Trump administration is that there is this mysterious 'they'. 'They' control the Justice Dept., The FBI, the IRS and countless other U.S. Attorney's offices and State Attorney's Generals that are all combined in an effort to 'get' Trump. That is nonsese.

Further, many people have been convicted of campaign law violations including Michael Cohen, Dinesh D'Souza, Jesse Jackson jr. and others.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


If they were just doing their jobs, they would have smacked


Dec 18, 2018, 11:48 AM

Cohen with tax evasion, wire fraud, and whatever else and sent him to jail for decades. Nope. They want Trump. Making Cohen plead to this felony when it's never been successfully tried in court, is a pretty clear indicator this isn't about Cohen, or Russian collusion either. And Monica's BJ wasn't about a shady Arkansas real estate transaction either. Ken Starr was out to get Clinton, and the excuse was Whitewater. Mueller is out to get Trump, and the excuse is Russian collusion.

Mueller thinks his best shot at impeachment or charges lies in the campaign finance route with the payoff. That's what this is showing me. Again, if there was Russian collusion, impeach Trump. There is none proven to date.

Not to mention there are dozens of current and former members of Congress guilty of the same "campaign finance" violations. I'd wager Congress won't even touch this because of what they've done with their slush fund for decades.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Impeachment is more about court of public opinion than


Dec 18, 2018, 4:01 PM

court of law, seeing as how it's elected politicians doing the prosecution and rendering judgment, not the judiciary.

In that vein, I can see why Mueller would start rolling out charges and getting confessions on lesser crimes by people closer to Trump in order for the public to understand how often and on what matters the President has lied to all of us, including his base, from start to finish. Even his TV attorney Giuliani (my how the mighty have fallen) is agreeing that Trump has been lying about many things, including business deals with Russia through much of the 2016 campaign - just not under oath so it's not "criminal". This makes it easier for more serious, substantive charges, if there in fact are any, to be leveled in a more believable and welcome environment as the investigation nears its conclusion.

"Wow, Trump lied like crazy about all of this small stuff - good chance he's also lying about the big stuff too."

Personally I don't believe there is anything the Mueller investigation will actually uncover that would lead to impeachment, including ample evidence for obstruction and collusion, considering the partisanship in DC and the depth of pathological lying that is Trump and his close associates, which muddles truth so much that there always seems to be room for doubt. However, were evidence to come to light that shows where Trump is in debt to, or in some other form compromised by, ANY foreign power, then that's a whole different ballgame. Mueller's report and conclusions would serve as more of a tool diminishing Trump's credibility about this than a body of evidence used to vote to remove.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: If they were just doing their jobs, they would have smacked


Dec 18, 2018, 4:11 PM [ in reply to If they were just doing their jobs, they would have smacked ]

No...actually Cohen himself said publically that he paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 in hush money publically. That is illegal when it involves a political campaign.

They didn't just make it up or create it out of thin air. He admitted to it and they couldn't just ignore it. It is illegal.

You view seems to be that they should have just charged him with tax evasion and fraud and ignore the admissions to crimes he made publically. Not sure how that works?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


A lot of people have been found guilty of campaign finance


Dec 18, 2018, 11:06 AM [ in reply to I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a ]

violations. Most pleaded guilty to reduced charges:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_people_convicted_of_campaign_finance_violations

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Not a payoff to a mistress.***


Dec 18, 2018, 11:40 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Not a payoff to a mistress.***


Dec 18, 2018, 11:43 AM

So what your saying is that robbing a bank is different from robbing a liquor store?

How 'bout if someone rob's a mom and pop hardware store, is that less serious as well?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


False analogy.***


Dec 18, 2018, 11:49 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a


Dec 18, 2018, 12:18 PM [ in reply to I love how they had Cohen on all that bad stuff, then cut a ]

Tiggity® said:

deal with him to plead guilty to campaign finance violations? Something no one has ever been FOUND guilty of in a court of law.




What? It happens all the time, usually with New England/New York/New Jersey types, and they're usually Democrats. It's probably a rite of passage up there, or they prosecute more actively than us down here. It's not that uncommon for some to serve time in addition to getting booted out of office, either.

I do remember that guy in North Carolina lost his law license and had a bunch of other hassle when convicted of not reporting a darn helicopter ride, though, but I think you're either allowed to be Boss Hogg in the South, or we just don't have as many cases.

So yeah, Trump could possibly find himself an orange jumpsuit just for what we know he's done, but I don't think that'll be it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The Rule of Law


Dec 18, 2018, 10:18 AM

It takes a special kind of stupid to think serving a warrant is out of bounds but somehow you can crack down on Saturday Night Live for a skit.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Seriously, how is it unthinkable or unheard of to


Dec 18, 2018, 10:40 AM

Search a lawyers office? Was the warrant wonky in any way?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Re: The Rule of Law


Dec 18, 2018, 10:54 AM

The real crime here is not being loyal to Trump. Also, what about Ivanka's Hillary's emails!?!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The Rule of Law


Dec 18, 2018, 8:42 PM

Makes me wonder what evidence the FBI showed the judge to justify a warrant. My guess is it was probably obtained illegally through the FISA surveillance that was itself falsely justified by a fake dossier the FBI never verified but was allowed to ensnare everyone in Trumps circle. Now why would the Obama FBI/DOJ pull a stunt like that? Makes no nevermind either way. Lawyer-Client confidentiality was breached under a false pretense which makes it all complete bullsht.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 31
| visibility 554
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic