»
Topic: Thanks for shafting us NCAA
Replies: 6   Last Post: Mar 12, 2018 11:26 AM by: cbtiger76
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 6  

Thanks for shafting us NCAA


Posted: Mar 12, 2018 10:36 AM
 

With sending clemson to calli and on top of that making us play at 10 ####### o' clock. I thought we should have been giving a better geographic location. Gonna be a tough out considering every year a 12 always upsets a 5. I would love to play aburn or coc in the next round.


Re: Thanks for shafting us NCAA


Posted: Mar 12, 2018 10:39 AM
 

You sound worried . You worried bro ?

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

DB23


Re: Thanks for shafting us NCAA


Posted: Mar 12, 2018 10:40 AM
 

You sound worried . You worried bro ?

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

DB23


Re: Thanks for shafting us NCAA


Posted: Mar 12, 2018 10:42 AM
 

Sounds pretty worried to me.


Re: Thanks for shafting us NCAA

[1]
Posted: Mar 12, 2018 10:46 AM
 

Its Clemson basketball, there all ways a reason to be worried until that last tick on the clock hits zero no matter who we play.


Re: Thanks for shafting us NCAA


Posted: Mar 12, 2018 11:26 AM
 

Unfortunately, there is much truth to what our brother JRSIMP has posted. As a Clemson basketball fan since the mid to late 60's, I have many more scars and painful memories than memories of grandeur and fulfillment. No loss was more painful than the U Conn. buzzer beater back in 90 (?). That being said, I am proud of what this year's team has accomplished by greatly exceeding all preseason expectations, notwithstanding the premature loss of Grantham. Because of that loss, I am grading this team on a curve. Making it to the Sweet 16 would be very rewarding, and anything beyond that would be miraculous. Allez Tigres!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Step away from the ledge.....


Posted: Mar 12, 2018 11:24 AM
 

Its gonna be alright....


Replies: 6  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1703 people have read this post