»
Topic: UGA ranked #6
Replies: 57   Last Post: Nov 5, 2019 4:52 AM by: tigerpaws®
[ Tiger Boards - Football ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 57  

UGA ranked #6

[7]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:17 AM
    Reply

almost makes me want to quit watching college football.

How can a team lose AT HOME to a team like South Carolina who is down to their 3rd string QB and be ranked ahead of multiple undefeated teams?

What a joke.

2019 white level member

Would you put money on Baylor or Minnesota to


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:19 AM
    Reply

beat UGA straight up on a neutral field?

Me either.


UGa lost at home to uof5c so anything is possible***

[3]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:23 AM
    Reply



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


I agree that it's possible

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:32 AM
    Reply

I still wouldnt bet on it


Re: Would you put money on Baylor or Minnesota to


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:26 AM
    Reply

Kirby Dumb would get out coached by both


Probably but fortunately for him he has about 60 more


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:33 AM
    Reply

blue chip recruits on his roster than either of them.


Re: Would you put money on Baylor or Minnesota to

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:46 AM
    Reply

So this is all based on feelings....why am I surprised?

2019 white level member


A Home Loss to a Garbage USUCK Team - Baylor or Minnesota


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:45 AM
    Reply

Would win that game 50-50.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Would you put money on Baylor or Minnesota to


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:49 AM
    Reply

What has ugay done to make u think Baylor couldn't beat them. Beat FLA, ooooh?


I didn't say they couldnt, I said i wouldn't bet on it.


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:02 AM
    Reply

It wouldn't be 50-50. Georgia would be like 75-80% favorites to beat either of those teams. The line would likely be double digits.

Clemson would be 14-17 point favorites over either team.


Maybe not, but I definitely wouldn't put money on UGA


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:32 AM
    Reply

in that game either. How can you trust that they are good?

During this century, have they ever been really good?


Re: Would you put money on Baylor or Minnesota to


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 7:15 PM
    Reply

People are haters. The Pitt team that beat us our Natty year was probably about the same level as Usuck is this year. Btw we were at home that game incase some people forgot. UGA is certainly a top 6 team in my eyes.


Re: Would you put money on Baylor or Minnesota to


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 7:30 PM
    Reply

It's pointless to try and point out the obvious. The anti-UGA, ESPN, SEC, Finebaum sentiment has destroyed any common sense.


Georgia may win the $EC Least...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:28 AM
    Reply

but they won't beat Bama (with Tua) or LSU.

Georgia still has to play Missouri, Auburn, and Texas A&M. Frankly, I think they lose one of those as well.




2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: Georgia may win the $EC Least...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:15 AM
    Reply

I can already see them fall all the way down to 7th haha.

Or we can use the Kirk Herbstriet method and their quality loss means they should move up to #5 because of how good they looked losing.


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:29 AM
    Reply

It’s pretty simple. They are better than those undefeated teams. They would be favored by two touchdowns at least against Minn or Baylor.

Sure they lost against a very bad team. A very very bad team, but that doesn’t mean USuCk is a better team than them. They played terrible, made critical mistakes, and lost. If UNC happened to make that two point conversion against us and we lost, that wouldn’t mean we are a worse team than UNC. It would mean we played terrible for one game.


I think his point is...

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:35 AM
    Reply

if Clemson lost at home to an unranked opponent with a losing record, we would drop so far in the polls there would be virtually no chance to recover and get back in the CFP discussion.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: I think his point is...

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:42 AM
    Reply

You mean like losing to a 4-8 Syracuse team 2 years ago and ending up as the #1 team in the CFP?


Syracuse wasn't 4- 8 when we played them.***


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:43 AM
    Reply



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


They were when we got ranked #1 in the final CFP rankings

[2]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:47 AM
    Reply

though - which is all that really matters.


But but but....the meeeeeediaaaaa!***


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:58 AM
    Reply



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

exactly***


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:15 AM
    Reply



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Best Is The Standard


Re: Syracuse wasn't 4- 8 when we played them.***


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:35 AM
    Reply

They were 3-3 though which still isn't impressive, and we only dropped from #2 down to #7 in the next poll. I'm only pointing this out because I see so many people on here say it's only the SEC teams that barely drop when losing games.


Re: Syracuse wasn't 4- 8 when we played them.******


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:49 AM
    Reply




Re: Syracuse wasn't 4- 8 when we played them.***


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:50 AM
    Reply


They were 3-3 though which still isn't impressive, and we only dropped from #2 down to #7 in the next poll. I'm only pointing this out because I see so many people on here say it's only the SEC teams that barely drop when losing games.



If I’m not mistaken UGA dropped 7 spots, and rightfully so, for the loss to SCu.


Re: I think his point is...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:07 AM
    Reply

Clemson lost on the road to Syracuse with a injured Kelly Bryant. What's ugay excuse?


Well...in fairness...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:09 AM
    Reply

they played like **** but still should have won the game.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: I think his point is...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:28 AM
    Reply

You also tend to forgot a lot of top teams lost that year that let us back in to it.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Yup...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:34 AM
    Reply

and that could happen for UGa this year too assuming they continue to win as well.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: I think his point is...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:38 AM
    Reply

All 4 of the CFP teams had 1 loss that season, and we were ranked #1 so the playoff committee still valued us above the other teams even though we had a bad loss. Georgia shouldn't get in if they lose another game this year, but I don't think the South Carolina loss alone should take them out of consideration.


Re: I think his point is...

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:43 AM
    Reply

On the road on a friday night and we lost our QB early in the game.

UGA was facing a team at home who was down to their 3rd string QB who can't throw the ball over 10 yards.

The SEC gets the benefit of the doubt every year in these polls. Rarely do you see a team with the same record ranked higher than an SEC team.

2019 white level member

Re: I think his point is...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 5:58 PM
    Reply

I totally agree with you on this one.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: I think his point is...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:11 PM
    Reply

So what about when we lost to Pitt at home? Ofcourse we had some luck with other teams losing that night but UGA should be in the top 6 or 7 for sure still imo.


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:35 AM
    Reply

Both Baylor and Minnesota have had a very soft schedule so far... now they will play against teams with a pulse is still up for debate.

We know Georgia... they will Georgia it. Plays well against any first string QB but will get wrecked by a backup.


UGA played worse against SCar than Clemson did against UNC

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:49 AM
    Reply

but that doesn't mean that they aren't a good team.

I absolutely think UGA is one of the 6 best teams in College Football. I hate them. I think Clemson would beat them by 2 TDs. But I think they're a very good team.


I think UGa is a top 10 team...

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 8:56 AM
    Reply

I don't think they are a playoff team.

I also think they would crush Baylor.

I haven't seen Minnesota play enough to accurately assess that match-up.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: UGA played worse against SCar than Clemson did against UNC


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:13 AM
    Reply

Been a life long Georgia fans and long time supporter of Clemson. Don’t disagree with anything you said ... finally glad to hear the true attitude of a champion on TigerNet this season. (Long term member. )

A true champion doesn’t have to degrade anyone to get there point across.

- Sure Georgia is not where Clemson is, program wise.

- Sure CKS is less experienced than Dabo and more apt to make mistakes.

- Sure, Georgia has a much harder road to make the playoffs than Clemson.

- Sure, Georgia had a horrible game and lost to SCu. No excuses from this Dawg fan. Hard to win a game when the DL is in your backfield every single play. As if game decisions were not tough enough but this just multiplies it. (By the way Georgia is not the only top 10 team that has had a tough game. )

In the end, it will play out on the field and Georgia has beaten two teams currently in the top 15, lost to an unranked team, still has a top 15 team on it’s schedule. If and only if they make it through that they will have a top 5 team to play to even possibly earn a trip to the playoffs. Would rather them have Clemson’s odds, but that’s not where they are.


Re: UGA played worse against SCar than Clemson did against UNC


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:27 AM
    Reply

To be quite honest with you I thought Ugay would win CFP this year. Ugay is loaded across the board except at WR. I took off the orange colored glasses and said "well maybe this is the year off the mutt." You guys kept bringing in top 3 classes hard to ignore. Still might have a shot though. But if Cager is your best Wr I dont know.


two things in this photo that uga can't get past....


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:31 AM
    Reply
ks.jpg(87.9 K)



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: UGA played worse against SCar than Clemson did against UNC


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:45 AM
    Reply

That is fair. Georgia would be in a world of hurt without him. Perkins still has to develop his skills on getting open. Robertson has not developed as I hoped.

Georgia will have to get much better to have a shot ... much better. All I have is hope at this point. Nothing more, nothing less.


Look at the bright side...


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:48 AM
    Reply

you're in a better position than Florida and you'll both likely win your regular season finale against your in-state rivals.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


SEC is overrated; results in bias


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 6:38 PM
    Reply

Why are we giving Florida credit to some of you defending the Georgia dogs? Their "2nd toughest team on their schedule was Florida. Florida beat up the bottom of the SEC least. UT Martin(fcs). Miami who I believe may have just gotten back to .500 in the ACC. They also beat fcs Towson.

Every large school will play an FCS opponent; but two. Vanderbilt, Tennessee, South Carolina is the bottom of the SEC least.

Georgia gets the benefit of the doubt for playing a team with those credentials, really?

That's what some of you are missing. It's the giving the benefit of the doubt - sight regardless of what they actually show on the field. They(Florida) played toe to toe with their back up QB; and Georgia still gets the SEC-Credit. Really? Why?

Must all be true since all those SEC teams are ranked right? Wrong! Of course they are ranked - the Wyoming Cowboys beat Missouri and yet at one point after that game Missouri was ranked 22nd.


Re: SEC is overrated; results in bias


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:17 PM
    Reply

C'mon man!! You cannot seriously think UGA isn't a top 7 team. Florida may be overrated idk but they would probably beat Baylor or Minnesota. The SEC is the best conference this year but it is close I believe.


Re: UGA played worse against SCar than Clemson did against UNC


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:00 AM
    Reply

Well..

In the defense of many around here your fan base is a close 2nd to U5C in regards to arrogance and delusion. I live around intolerable UGA fans everyday here in GA. Although there are some good ones, like you seem to be, but many of your people are a dread to be around.

That makes it easier to dislike UGA...That and Smart is paying for players.

military_donation.jpg

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln


Re: UGA played worse against SCar than Clemson did against UNC


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:00 AM
    Reply

Well..

In the defense of many around here your fan base is a close 2nd to U5C in regards to arrogance and delusion. I live around intolerable UGA fans everyday here in GA. Although there are some good ones, like you seem to be, but many of your people are a dread to be around.

That makes it easier to dislike UGA...That and Smart is paying for players.

military_donation.jpg

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln


Because they started #3. Thats how the AP works and why


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:15 AM
    Reply

the CFP committee system is in place now. This has always been the issue with the AP and Coaches polls

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Best Is The Standard


Re: Because they started #3. Thats how the AP works and why


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:41 AM
    Reply

So you honestly don't think the committee will have Georgia somewhere in the 6-8 range?


It's all about ensuring the SEC gets a team in the CFP.


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:33 AM
    Reply

Now that UGA will represent the East in the SECCG, look for their ranking to go up as far as #4 before the game. That way, no matter who wins the game, the winner is in. Period.


Re: It's all about ensuring the SEC gets a team in the CFP.


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:47 AM
    Reply

Don’t think that will happen. Without decisive wins ... much improved would be required.


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 9:56 AM
    Reply

I don't have a problem with it. It's just the media. It'll work itself out. IF UGA beats Bama/LSU in the SECCG than we can have a discussion but based on what they have shown thus far I don't think there is even a remote possibility of that happening


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:56 AM
    Reply

Stop dude.

They spared us when we lost to Sh*ttsburg at home...

With a few lucky loses from teams ahead of us we slid right back in. Absolutely no problem with UGA being where they are at.

military_donation.jpg

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 12:11 PM
    Reply

I would be fine with them sliding back in if teams in front of them started losing but to be ranked ahead of multiple undefeated teams after losing to South Carolina is ridiculous.

2019 white level member

Re: UGA ranked #6

[1]
Posted: Nov 4, 2019 6:19 PM
    Reply

You keep talking about being in front of multiple undefeated teams but the two they are in front of are Baylor and Minnesota. We have had a grueling schedule compared to those two so far. If Minnesota beats Penn State this week (I think) then they will probably jump Georgia and they certainly will if they win out. Same think with Baylor, if they win out they will get into the top 4. Nobody expects either to win out, though.


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:20 PM
    Reply

Yep UGA is better than those 2 teams even with the Usuck L. Now I agree if those teams win out they will earn respect but UGA would be a huge favorite in Vegas against Baylor or Minn and with good reason.


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 10:59 PM
    Reply

If your team loses at HOME to a 5-loss bunch of scrubs, then your team should not even be allowed to sniff the Top Ten. 'nuff said.


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:21 PM
    Reply

You realize we lost to Pitt at home, made the CFP, and won it right?


Re: UGA ranked #6


Posted: Nov 4, 2019 11:21 PM
    Reply

Exactly what I posted yesterday. They are so proud of Georgia climbing back to #6, after getting spanked by the 120 ranked team in the country. It’s full of media driven sec garbage

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Go Tigers! Once A Tiger Always A Tiger


As much as it pains me to say this, if UGA goes on to win


Posted: Nov 5, 2019 4:52 AM
    Reply

their remaining four games and the SEC Championship, they deserve to be in the conversation. It’s no different than Clemson losing to Pitt in 2016.

2019 white level member

Replies: 57  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: CFP National Championship
FOR SALE: I have 8 club level tickets the peach bowl 650 each call joey 864 8483833

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Tiger Boards - Football ]
Start New Topic
3046 people have read this post