|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1,858
|
Orange Blooded [3981]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 5094
Joined: 8/23/16
|
Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 5:28 PM
|
|
How did they go from being bad ok offense all last year basically to now people are saying they are deep at WR, RB and have one if the best Quarterbacks in their league? From being so depleted a year ago to now being stacked on offense doesn't make sense to me
|
|
|
|
 |
Team Captain [498]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 625
Joined: 8/31/16
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 5:31 PM
|
|
It's coot logic. Don't try to understand it you will go insane
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 6:34 PM
|
|
Ok squirrel you get a TU from me
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 5:34 PM
|
|
All of their non rated guys and 3 stars are diamonds in the rough....every. single. one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19803
Joined: 1/15/11
|
U didn't watch the UMASS game ? LOL
Aug 25, 2017, 6:00 PM
|
|
That's their reference point LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
because they aren't. coots have to tell themselves...
Aug 25, 2017, 6:08 PM
|
|
that because reality sucks for them
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5701]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7026
Joined: 8/3/05
|
They are one solid QB sack from having no QB.
Aug 25, 2017, 6:09 PM
|
|
Wolfpack DL rivals ours in ability. They may not have a QB after next Saturday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1813]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1656
Joined: 8/7/14
|
Please pardon me for stating the obvious, but
Aug 25, 2017, 6:09 PM
|
|
They're counting their chickens before they hatch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11/29/15
|
Re: Please pardon me for stating the obvious, but
Aug 25, 2017, 6:35 PM
|
|
This really proves we can go on all day with this
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40742]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10676
Joined: 6/23/17
|
Sorry. I'm drawing a blank here.***
Aug 25, 2017, 6:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7191]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 20374
Joined: 8/18/06
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 6:23 PM
|
|
N/A,two,and three star freshman WR's,RB's and QB's is how they go from being bad
to being deep.
Can you just imagine Clemson with all that type of depth?
And to think we are having to replace a QB who lost all of 3 games in 3 years.
P.S.The N/A players are the ones we really need to concern ourselves with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [157]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 181
Joined: 11/20/03
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 6:31 PM
|
|
They do have some decent receivers but with that line they better be counting on short passes and yards after the catch. The forehead will struggle against any decent defense. Luckily for them, they play in the SEC and don't have to worry about many good defenses or offenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 6:35 PM
|
|
That's easy, they lit up South Florida, ranked 120th in total team defense. I remind you, they still lost the game. AND Pinto/Vega looked like Brady against that coot defense, which ranked 66th last year. It only makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11/29/15
|
I have an answer for you Daniel son
Aug 25, 2017, 6:36 PM
|
|
Having the best QB in the SEC is no great accomplishment, any more questions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1593]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 2852
Joined: 6/9/17
|
Re: Some one answer this ( Gamecock related)
Aug 25, 2017, 6:41 PM
|
|
Bentley will be lucky to throw for 2k yards this season.
Their skilled players are Very Avg at best.
The Coots will be one of the worst offensive teams in the nation.
I can see their D improving a bit but they will still be bad overall.
Look for a 4-5 win season at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1,858
|
|
|
50
