|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1,846
|
CU Guru [1088]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1353
Joined: 9/20/04
|
So, hold on. Y’all saying 2 SECW teams?
Nov 24, 2019, 12:22 AM
|
|
With LSU win?
Us & OSU?
|
|
|
|
 |
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: So, hold on. Y’all saying 2 SECW teams?
Nov 24, 2019, 12:32 AM
|
|
ESPN is still trying to figure out how to have 3 SEC teams in the CFP. LSU, Bama, and UGA. If we lose a game, then they'll try to squeeze Florida in there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
I gave a scenario of 3 SEC teams and even thinking
Nov 24, 2019, 1:19 AM
|
|
I was ridiculed here. If Georgia wins out, it will be interesting with 3 SEC teams all one loss. ESPN agenda will work on angel for that to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7173]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6879
Joined: 1/25/17
|
Re: I gave a scenario of 3 SEC teams and even thinking
Nov 24, 2019, 1:52 AM
|
|
That's not going to happen. No way know how. Even if Georgia beats LSU. There is no way Alabama gets in. Not without omitting Clemson or Ohio State.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6620
Joined: 11/30/98
|
The committee knows they can’t keep excluding
Nov 24, 2019, 1:53 AM
|
|
PAC12 and B1G teams the playoffs, or the partnership will fall apart. The B1G and PAC12 will tell the other three partners that they’re going back to the Rose Bowl every year. ESPN is just trying to create controversy, because they think that’ll help ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7173]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6879
Joined: 1/25/17
|
Re: The committee knows they can’t keep excluding
Nov 24, 2019, 2:19 AM
|
|
I agree. People have to understand that dynamic a bit. It's a bad look to continuously keep PAC 12 teams out. In fact, it's been what 2 years since Ohio State and a Big Ten team made it.
Picture taking their collective balls and leaving.
The SEC is everything folks don't understand transparency.
Alabama getting in made sense in 17 when OSU had two losses. It won't this season versus 1 loss champs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10904]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12988
Joined: 8/4/14
|
Agree 100 %, Hillrock. A non conference winner should not
Nov 24, 2019, 2:50 AM
|
|
even be considered for the CFP, unless they have less losses than one of the conference champs, as you said, Bama in 2017!
Another reason is, why would you want possible re-matches? They should be avoided, if at all possible. This year, LSU has already proven they are better than Bama, why make them play again?
I do think the committee will keep UGA & Bama 4th and 5th, up until the final poll, because that just creates more controversy, thus mure fan interest in the playoff shows.
For the final poll, after the CCG's are played, the PAC 12 champ will move up to fourth, as they should! Even if UGA were to beat LSU! Again, UGA will have proven they are better than LSU...why set up a re-match?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [52219]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23003
Joined: 10/10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25391]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14697
Joined: 11/3/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [403]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 218
Joined: 10/14/11
|
Re: So, hold on. Y’all saying 2 SECW teams?
Nov 24, 2019, 8:14 AM
|
|
Doesn’t matter to me. We’d be able to say we were 4–0 against the SEC this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1,846
|
|
|
50
