Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 17
| visibility 1

Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....


Sep 28, 2012, 11:30 PM

Since the year 2000 SCAR is 92-61 (60.1%).

In the past 5 years Clemson is 44-27 (61.9%).
In the past 5 years SCAR is 44-25 (63.8%).

Under Dabo Swinney Clemson is 32-20 (61.5%).
Under Steve Spurrier SCAR is 59-35 (62.8%).



Your thoughts?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

the greatest era in Coot history......


Sep 28, 2012, 11:39 PM

is equal to what we consider mediocre?!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Plain and simple... statistics wise.. were are better.


Sep 28, 2012, 11:39 PM

They have had their coach longer than we have had ours and he is close to their winning percentage in just really four full seasons'

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....


Sep 28, 2012, 11:41 PM

Jesus is the reason we have percentages. His blood allowed us to develop and analyze statistics. Ya Verily.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

OK? what does that have to do with the price of eggs in


Sep 28, 2012, 11:43 PM

china? We all know Jesus died to save our sins.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Trolling.


Sep 28, 2012, 11:45 PM

It seems like in every thread someone goes off on a tangent on the big JC. I imagine them speaking in tongues and so forth. It's rather frightening as I have a very active imagination and naturally think the worse in people (there's a chili vomit stain involved).

It actually stems from a post earlier about a gent who was proud of his daughter and internet apostle had to go ruin his moment in the sunshine. I am not sure if he was serious so I decided to follow suit.


Tittysprinkles.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Read this...


Sep 28, 2012, 11:56 PM [ in reply to OK? what does that have to do with the price of eggs in ]

http://www.tigernet.com/forums/message.jspa?messageID=12850981

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Jesus created statistics to test us.


Sep 28, 2012, 11:51 PM [ in reply to Re: Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%).... ]

Only through Jesus will statistics be understood.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: haha yeah thats where I got it.***


Sep 28, 2012, 11:59 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....


Sep 28, 2012, 11:51 PM

they play better competition?

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

how many times has usuc been on probation since 2000?


Sep 29, 2012, 5:09 AM

theres part of the answer.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: how many times has usuc been on probation since 2000?


Sep 29, 2012, 8:56 AM

yep.......twice.......between 2005 and 2014....a ten yr period, usuck will have been on probation 6 yrs........making the sec sooooo proud.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....***


Sep 29, 2012, 9:07 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: how many times has usuc been on probation since 2000?


Sep 29, 2012, 9:11 AM

Here's my question and I'm not necessarily referring to last Sat. But how many games has Clemson not "finished" or closed the deal? Second, how many games have The Tigers lost by <5 pts in the last 6 yrs? I pretty sure it's more than 20....Like Herbstreet said the, "no other fan is more frustrated than A Clemson Tiger fan".

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....***


Sep 29, 2012, 9:12 AM

Here's my question and I'm not necessarily referring to last Sat. But how many games has Clemson not "finished" or closed the deal? Second, how many games have The Tigers lost by <5 pts in the last 6 yrs? I pretty sure it's more than 20....Like Herbstreet said the, "no other fan is more frustrated than A Clemson Tiger fan".
Reply
   

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Apples and Oranges... ACC < SEC


Sep 29, 2012, 9:17 AM

Just saying

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Since the year 2000 Clemson is 98-59 (62.4%)....


Sep 29, 2012, 9:24 AM

If my understanding of coot logic is correct, that 1.3% difference between dabo and ball sack is equal to approximately 17.8%.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Dang...Close! And for Tigs it's bad; for Coots they're NC!*


Sep 29, 2012, 10:26 AM

CU & GoTiGERs!

badge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonorlightbulbbill.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 17
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic