Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 108
| visibility 1

UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 7:37 AM

In the UGA situational scrimmage, they started at half-time with Clemson ahead 28-0. UGA pulled it out 42-41. I'm impressed that the UGA offense scored 42 points in 2 quarters, but what may be telling is that the scout team scored 13 points on the UGA defense:

http://www.orangeandwhite.com/news/2013/aug/22/dawgs-rally-past-faux-clemson-game-rehearsal-scrim/

So, the lesson that should be learned and applied to the "real" game is for Clemson to get up 28-0 at the half. We should be able to hold UGA's offense to less than 42 and we should be able to score more than 13 over the second half - particularly as the UGA defense wears down.

So - it's then easy to project the winner as Clemson by a score of somewhere around 80-21. No problem.... piece o' cake.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

shouldn't that be "Faux Paw"? ;-) *****


Aug 22, 2013, 8:12 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wasted talent.....***


Aug 22, 2013, 8:22 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 8:18 AM

There D must be hurting. A fake clemson offense scored on them. Don't think they will be able to stop the real thing.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 9:16 AM

Lol...You tiger fans are hilarious

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 9:22 AM [ in reply to Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson" ]

You guys really aren't that good, so tone down the cocky talk. Our Starting FS,SS,CB, two DL, and LB didn't even play in the scrimmage. Plus, Coach Richt spots the ball in various situations, so the stats aren't what they seem. Hopefully we put up 50 on that pathetic ACC defense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

well, we sure ain't no pathetic sec offense, i promise!


Aug 22, 2013, 9:26 AM

plus, i didn't think y'alls d was any better than ours last year, and we return a ton more defensive guys than y'all do!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: well, we sure ain't no pathetic sec offense, i promise!


Aug 22, 2013, 9:39 AM

You gave up 31 to Ga Tech, we held them to 10. You also Gabe up 48 to Nc State,31 to BC, and 49 to Fsu. Dont ever say yall defense was any where near as talented as ours. Plus we return almost 12 defensive players. Most of them didn't start because the starters were drafted to NFL teams, unlike Clemson. Trust me, we have a lot more talent than you on defense waiting to be unleashed

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

who said anything about that? i said we had just a good a D.


Aug 22, 2013, 9:52 AM

yes, our ability to give up long plays was simply amazing, something i am sure an additional year in bv's defensive system will help alleviate. y'all had talent coming out the wazoo, and just couldn't do crap with it! i am expecting more of the same. we had an ex-nfl dc once,too, and as a college team, we didn't get enough practice time to run it to it's full potential. i can see the same thing with y'alls d.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: who said anything about that? i said we had just a good a D.


Aug 22, 2013, 9:55 AM

Actually 4 starters were suspended, and a slew of injuries continued to the underperforming.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We also had 3 starting corners out for the year***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:56 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: We also had 3 starting corners out for the year***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:00 AM

It wasn't like Clemson has always been this powerhouse on defense, so im not so sure that matters.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You've got to be kidding if you don't think it mattered


Aug 22, 2013, 10:03 AM

We had to play a WR at corner for part of a game. I'm giving reasonable facts as to why our secondary wasn't good. You dismiss your defensive concerns by saying 'Well, the guys who played against Buffalo looked good, so they'll be fine'

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: You've got to be kidding if you don't think it mattered


Aug 22, 2013, 10:06 AM

Malcom Mitchell, our starting WR played CB for four games. That's no excuse. Thats the difference between us. We have talent in our depth thats at least decent enough to get by.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I didn't say we didn't get by with him. He made plays


Aug 22, 2013, 10:08 AM

And if you had depth of talent, wouldn't that mean you didn't need someone to switch positions?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: I didn't say we didn't get by with him. He made plays


Aug 22, 2013, 10:16 AM

It just so happens he was the number one corner in the 2011 class for Ga, so he was talented enough to switch positions and still be effective. How many of your receivers can effectively play corner in the Sec?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So he was a corner first? I'm confused


Aug 22, 2013, 10:19 AM

Then a better question is how many corners can play receiver in the SEC?

Which is a ridiculous, impossible-to-know question. Anyone I DID list, you'd shrug off, so it's pointless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


hopefully none. our wr's being nfl 1st rnd draft choices is


Aug 22, 2013, 7:01 PM [ in reply to Re: I didn't say we didn't get by with him. He made plays ]

a better measure,imo. playing corner in the sec may just be an easier task than playing the same position in the acc. read it and weep! our offenses are better, no if's and or but's.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

did you watch clemson at all last year ? if you did, you


Aug 22, 2013, 10:00 AM [ in reply to Re: who said anything about that? i said we had just a good a D. ]

would have seen that we had a different secondary every week, because of injuries. our original 4 starters probably didn't play 2 games together the entire year at 100 %. i'll call your injuries. now the suspended part, well, y'all win that hands down!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Return "almost" 12?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:56 AM [ in reply to Re: well, we sure ain't no pathetic sec offense, i promise! ]

W T F?


Are you combining them, to approach your almost figure?

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wouldn't that be 11 then?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:57 AM

Or is it the possibly-suspended-unless-we-need-him kicker that's the almost?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: Return "almost" 12?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:59 AM [ in reply to Return "almost" 12? ]

To be exact, we have 11 players returning with at least 2 appearances in games. Does that answer your question?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Fairly sure we have 18 guys where we can say the same***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:00 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Advantage to UGA! - Dawg4o4***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:22 AM



2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 9:29 AM [ in reply to Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson" ]

Hey Dawg404, Be sure to come back on Sept. 1 & take your Medicine.. I promise it will not be good! LOL

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 9:33 AM

Wont need it for Clemson. You'll see on the 31st. That running up and down the field may work vs those weak ACC teams, but we aren't LSU either. Much better offense, and deeper on defense. Of course, beating you at home will fix that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Deeper on defense then LSU? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!


Aug 22, 2013, 9:35 AM

Oh man I needed that. I'm actually starting to think you guys are as delusional as the coots and that's saying something. You mean the LSU team that had something like 8-10 players drafted last year and two first round DEs, two first round DBs and a slew of LBs? Wow, just wow.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Deeper on defense then LSU? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!


Aug 22, 2013, 9:42 AM

So Jarvis Jones,Alec Ogletree, John jenkins,Shawn Williams, Bacarri Rambo, Sanders Commings, Cornelius Washington, Branden Smith, Kwame Geathers, and Abry Jones didn't get drafted or signed? What bulldog team were you watching?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And despite all that talent where did your D rank last year?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:43 AM

Your run D sucked out loud and your pass D wasn't great either as good passing teams burned you. And now you've lost all of that talent and have a slew of injuries as well

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And despite all that talent where did your D rank last year?


Aug 22, 2013, 7:06 PM

Last year uga ranked 8th in pass d, 18th scoring d, 17th in turn overs gained, 18th in redzone d, 44th in sacks, 34th in first down defense, 36th in third down defense, 18th in fourth down defense, 77th in rush d, and 32nd in total d. Rushing defense definitely killed us. All in all there is room for improvement.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And despite all that talent where did your D rank last year?


Aug 22, 2013, 7:27 PM

and the interesting matching stats...

Clemson was 10th in passing offense, 37th in rushing offense, 12th in 1st down leaders, tied with GA for 4th in receiving, 2nd in 3rd down conversions, 26th in 4th down conversions, 20th in fumbles lost, 6th in scoring offense, #1 in red zone offense,

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

you are about the dumbest ugaG fan that i have ever had the


Aug 22, 2013, 6:41 PM [ in reply to Re: Deeper on defense then LSU? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! ]

displeasure of having to reply too. you were not or, are not, nor will ever be, lsu's 2012 defense. get over it, and quit stroking your ego's, amongst other things! me thinks that you actually feeling and/or believing,etc. that y'all were better than lsu on defense shows/proves that you don't know jack about football, you need to scurry on back to secrant, or some other homer site. you have lost all credibility here(as if you ever had any).

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wow, deeper on defense?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:37 AM [ in reply to Re: Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson" ]

I don't care how deep you are son, those were NFL caliber players that were doubled over gasping for every breath of air they could take. When's the last time your defense with how many new starters were on the field for 100 plays??? I'm waiting....

Come take your meds Sept 1. Keep talking that Clemson/ACC bull**** all you want. After we whip that @ss you better come with a better excuse than "well we were looking ahead to SC, we didn't want to be there...."

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, deeper on defense?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:45 AM

When your defense stops giving up 30 points per game to mediocre ACC teams, we'll talk.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, deeper on defense?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:50 AM [ in reply to Wow, deeper on defense? ]

Clemson never consistently ran 100 plays per game. Yall wanna be Oregon so bad. News flash, only proven players are Sammy Whammie, and Tajh Boyd. Those other receivers aren't proven, those RB's are second tier, and that horrible defense is comical. Sorry Tiger fans, get used to reality.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So then your only proven guys are Gurley and Murray?***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:52 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: So then your only proven guys are Gurley and Murray?***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:53 AM

Malcom Mitchell, Keith Marshall, Arthur Lynch,Michael Bennett, Chris Conley..etc. Trust me, we arent one dimensional by far, and have more than enough proven players

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Then right back atcha.


Aug 22, 2013, 9:55 AM

I know you've got SEC on the brain, but I can list off our receivers as well, so that's good enough, right?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: Then right back atcha.


Aug 22, 2013, 9:58 AM

But they aren't proven. We have two RB's with national recognition, two WR's with national recognition, and a few others on preseason watch lists.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I can same the same for ours(WRs)***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:59 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: Then right back atcha.


Aug 22, 2013, 6:37 PM [ in reply to Re: Then right back atcha. ]

Arthur Lynch is "proven"???? He has 26 career receptions. Stop talking out of your ###.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Who?***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:58 AM [ in reply to Re: So then your only proven guys are Gurley and Murray?*** ]



2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Who?***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:01 AM

On the watch lists? Arthur Lynch, Malcolm Mitchell, Keith Marshall,Gurley,Murray, Swann, Garrison Smith, and Jordan Jenkins.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

what list? bleacherreport?***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:03 AM



2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: what list? bleacherreport?***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:04 AM

No lol. The awards they give out the same day as the Heisman. Go look it up if you're interested.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's your farking list. You show it to me.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:07 AM

This is your argument. The burden of proof lies squarely on you. And, you have far from convinced me.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It's your farking list. You show it to me.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:12 AM

If i could put a link up i would, but  i promise its too much to write. Just search "Uga players CFPA watch list". You'll see every award our players are up for.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

links are hard, man.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:15 AM

I'm starting to understand. You're either a hardcore dawg or, maybe a coot.

Better get ready for lunch. Those fries ain't gonna drop themselves.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: links are hard, man.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:17 AM

Still waiting on you to tell me this oh so bad 6th place team we lost to.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hmm: When I Googled that...


Aug 22, 2013, 10:43 AM [ in reply to Re: It's your farking list. You show it to me. ]

...I got a list of episodes of "True Stories of the highway Patrol."

badge-donor-20yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Did he spot the ball and display p!ss poor clock management


Aug 22, 2013, 9:38 AM [ in reply to Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson" ]

like he did to cost you a shot at a national championship?? Wonder what sheet that one's on for the situational scrimmage..

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Did he spot the ball and display p!ss poor clock management


Aug 22, 2013, 9:43 AM

Did Clemson even sniff a chance at playing for the BCS title? Didnt think so.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No we didn't, but it almost makes it worse doesn't it??


Aug 22, 2013, 9:54 AM

Knowing your great wonderful coach buckled under the pressure by not knowing how to manage clock, and the next Peyton Manning choked again. Guess he was too worried about which hand bag he would have carried to the MNC game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: No we didn't, but it almost makes it worse doesn't it??


Aug 22, 2013, 9:56 AM

They make millions to coach, you dont. So im sure if they right a spike was necessary, it would've been done.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If they right a spike?? Dude, lay the bottle down...


Aug 22, 2013, 10:07 AM

And yeah they do make millions to coach, I do not, however I along with every other football fan in the world do know (without somebody having to pay me millions to know it) that a spike stops the clock, gives you time to set the play you want, and get the correct personnel on the field for that play.

Man.. By the way, why are you so cocky? What do y'all have to brag about? SEC champs? NO... National Champs? NO... Sugar Bowl Champs? NO... Awesome....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 10:26 AM [ in reply to Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson" ]

You do realize we don't have an ACC defense right? We have a Clemson defense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So their scout team that lacks our speed and experience.....


Aug 22, 2013, 8:24 AM

Scored on them and they had to "rally" to beat them? I'm feeling good about this.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So their scout team that lacks our speed and experience.....


Aug 22, 2013, 9:17 AM

You shouldn't be.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lol at the Dawg fan on our board


Aug 22, 2013, 9:18 AM

And here I thought you guys were classier then the coots.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

i will applaud them for keeping "tiger" outta their handles!


Aug 22, 2013, 9:21 AM

most usuc fans are so ashamed of their own mascot, that they try to "sneak" in using a decoy name!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So their scout team that lacks our speed and experience.....


Aug 22, 2013, 9:22 AM [ in reply to So their scout team that lacks our speed and experience..... ]

funny....you don't think there's speed in the SEC? got it!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You think you have our type of speed?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:31 AM

I can tell you now you have no one on your team with the speed of a Sammy Watkins or a Martavis Bryant or a Germone Hopper. But if you think you do and it's on the practice team then more power to you.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You think you have our type of speed?


Aug 22, 2013, 10:01 AM

I think you are wrong on that one. Justin Scott-Wesley owns the GA 100m record in HS. Reggie Davis won the FL 100M. Malcolm Mitchell and Keith Marshall can fly. Blake Sailors is said to be the fastest of all of them. You guys don't play against the speed we do in the SEC, so when you play other teams, you look faster than you may appear....

Sammy is fast. But as a team, you will see what fast is next week.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: You think you have our type of speed?


Aug 22, 2013, 10:03 AM

Bing! Marshall, Scott Wesley, and Reggie davis all ran 10.4 or under in the 100 meters, thats fast. We have a host of others that clock in 4.4 and 4.3.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sammy may be the third fastest receiver we have***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:05 AM [ in reply to Re: You think you have our type of speed? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: Sammy may be the third fastest receiver we have***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:08 AM

So! We have guys that can fly with the best of them. Should i name them and list their actual recorded times, not something made up?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I love it. yours are official recorded. Ours are made up***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:09 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: I love it. yours are official recorded. Ours are made up***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:13 AM

I never said that. I didn't even see anyone say anything about recorded times. I initiated the topic.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You said, exactly,


Aug 22, 2013, 10:16 AM

"Should i name them and list their actual recorded times, not something made up? "

Unless you meant you just wouldn't make up times, which yes, that would be nice, it's implying made up times somewhere.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: You said, exactly,


Aug 22, 2013, 10:18 AM

Thats what i was saying. That i would state factual times, not bs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Okay, but you did list recorded times***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:19 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Look it. Links are hard, man. - dAwg4o4***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:24 AM



2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Look it. Links are hard, man. - dAwg4o4***


Aug 22, 2013, 10:27 AM

I know, plus im on my phone so typing gets irritating with all the auto correct s and what not.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: So their scout team that lacks our speed and experience.....


Aug 22, 2013, 9:34 AM [ in reply to Re: So their scout team that lacks our speed and experience..... ]

Exactly! The only reason done of those guys are even on Scott team is because we are too deep in some areas. Uga Scout team> Clemson scout team.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

May I quote you on that?


Aug 22, 2013, 9:41 AM

I want to use it as an example of how to fail a 3rd grade composition project.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I vote for instead getting up 30-0 at the half. ;)***


Aug 22, 2013, 8:45 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's also not taking into account


Aug 22, 2013, 8:50 AM

how their defense would already be tired from chasing Sammy around the field in the first half of the game

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Whatever you do, always give 100%.....unless it's donating blood


They're gonna wish this game was only one half on the 31st***


Aug 22, 2013, 8:54 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Gurley and Marshall barely played.....


Aug 22, 2013, 9:19 AM

hence the 1 pt victory.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Did they practice flopping around with leg cramps?***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:36 AM



badge-donor-20yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Did they practice flopping around with leg cramps?***


Aug 22, 2013, 9:46 AM

We never did that, don't know what team you were watching.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 9:50 AM

Dawgs,

Don't "forget" your passwords on September 1st. That is all.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 9:52 AM

We won't. But im curious. What makes yall so cocky? Are yall reigning Champs? Acc champs? Orange bowl champs? Where is this undeserved sense of accomplishment and bravado coming from?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Excellent question.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:08 AM

Last I looked, y'all got beat, like the yard dogs that you are, by the 6th place team in the SEC.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Excellent question.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:14 AM

What team was that? Only teams we lost to was a bs game at south Carolina, which you lost to as well, and Eventual champs Bama.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

bs game?


Aug 22, 2013, 10:19 AM

I'd agree. It was bs, that the dawgs were even on the same field with the 6th place team. The 6th place team that, absolutely, woodshed whoop the yard dawgs.

Yeah, that team.

They did beat us but, it didn't leave red welps, on the back of our legs.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Excellent question.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:36 AM [ in reply to Re: Excellent question. ]

The trick is..you LOST both, though you talk like you won them..lol.

Hell, we LOST barely in overtime years back to what became the Nation Championship Auburn team with Cam Newton if you wanna play that card. And our score vs SCar looked better than yours, just saying.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Excellent question.


Aug 22, 2013, 3:54 PM

The trick is...you still lost BOTH of them lol. You still lost to FSU,USC, and Ga tech last year. But let you tangerine colored fools tell it, you went undefeated, just didn't play in the National championship.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GA Tech? Didn't happen. 11-2.***


Aug 22, 2013, 4:02 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Re: Excellent question.


Aug 22, 2013, 6:05 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Excellent question. ]

Now you've really confirmed what we already knew. You sir are a complete dumba$$.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Excellent question.


Aug 22, 2013, 6:50 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Excellent question. ]

http://www.sbnation.com/2012/10/6/3466132/clemson-georgia-tech-2012-results-score
"Georgia Tech vs. Clemson 2012 final score: Tigers beat Yellow Jackets, 47-31"

um...GA Tech??? you really need toput that pipe down and come back down from the clouds...we beat them last year. Record was 11-2, only losing to Fl State and SC, both ranked teams.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Instead of an ignore button, I need an "auto TD" button


Aug 22, 2013, 9:52 AM

for the likes of Dawgs404. That way, every time the coot/mutt posted, my account would automatically TD him and save me the trouble.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




The definition of awesome!


Never thought I'd see a Dawg that was so much like a coot


Aug 22, 2013, 10:00 AM

I think I'm starting to see why a lot of older Clemson fans hate UGA even more then the coots, something I never could understand.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think this buttsniffer may be worse than any coot I've


Aug 22, 2013, 10:08 AM

encountered since '04.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




The definition of awesome!


It's Dwag404.


Aug 22, 2013, 10:15 AM [ in reply to Instead of an ignore button, I need an "auto TD" button ]

nm



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


He wont be posting next week


Aug 22, 2013, 10:39 AM [ in reply to Instead of an ignore button, I need an "auto TD" button ]

Joined today, has posted 34 times. Middle school I think requires laptops in Georgia and part of his problem with the first 4 times he took a shot @ 7th grade was he didnt have a laptop.

Once school starts next week he will be busy with 7th grade math--AGAIN--unless

Here comes the Hammer!!!!

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He wont be posting next week


Aug 22, 2013, 3:46 PM

If you're referring to me, I'm a sophomore at Ga state. Graduated high school with a 3.5 gpa, so lets not bring all if this "7th grade math..blah blah" in here. Its a jab that I'll take lightly lol. Humorous nonetheless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If you'd studied just a little bit more.....


Aug 22, 2013, 6:48 PM

you'd know that you should say you "graduated FROM high school", not "graduated high school". If you'd done that, you might have graduated with a higher GPA than a 3.5 and gotten into a real school.

Disclaimer: I did take an accounting course at Ga. State because I heard the hype about how good their accounting department was/is. I confess that I called attention to an accounting professor's stupidity and did not take any more accounting classes there. These days, I have a CFO who is an accountant from Ga. State and I really get tired of correcting his mistakes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 10:20 AM

I think what makes this story is the fact that UGA beat a scout team by 1 who was running Clemson's offense.

So they barely got by a group of scout players picking up the Clemson offense based on taped games. How exactly does that translate to an actual coached team of 1st teamers who has been playing and preparing this offense for a few years now?

Not very good comparison to be putting out there. Maybe better off to run practice and not let this out of Ga

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: UGA Beats "Faux Clemson"


Aug 22, 2013, 10:24 AM

Clemson was spotted 28 points. A lot of regluar starters were out on both sides. Scrimmages are made to see how your team responds in certain situations. Its not like the scout team lined up vs the first team 0-0 at the fist quarter. Gotta get your facts before you state your opinion.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If so many starters were out


Aug 22, 2013, 10:32 AM

then what's the point of making anything of this scrimmage? I get that they scored a lot quickly, that's fine, but was it against scout team defense? The team that's supposed to be worse than the first team defense that still gave up points to a offense that's trying to simulate Clemson after a week?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


Re: If so many starters were out


Aug 22, 2013, 10:49 AM

Well, Richt's "mock games" are a pretty good indicator.
I think their fake Boise scored about 35, and the real Boise scored the same while humiliating the SEC East champs in their own back yard.
Fake Oklahoma State scored 24-ish, and real OSU did the same when they crapped all over the Bulldogs.
I didn't think we'd break over 40 on them, but I guess we will while we win by 2 TDs or more.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: If so many starters were out


Aug 22, 2013, 3:51 PM

You keep bringing scrimmage stats. Didn't WV score 70 on yall? 70!! Lost to Fsu yet again, barely beat NC state, yet the overwhelming arrogance would make you think you guys won 3 straight national titles. Its cool to be a die hard fan, but reality has to sink in that Clemson isn't as good as you guys think. Your offense can shooter 40 points per game, but your defense is sub par at best. Not a recipe for a championship right?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When's the last time you won YOUR conference butt licker?


Aug 22, 2013, 4:58 PM

You come over here talking a big game representing a school that underachieves year after year being recruiting champions. I know I know. You were 5 yards away from your mythical title game. You wouldn't have made it anyway's being EMBARRASSED by the coots.

You'll be going on five (5) Palmetto State losses in a row a few weeks from now ready for your coach to be put on the chopping block yet again. Same old Jawjaw. A mainstay choker.

You lose big next week loser. Your annual pathetic defense will be gassed and humiliated. Mark it. And your foul mouth DC will be canned yet again. We already know he was testing the waters last fall.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: If so many starters were out


Aug 22, 2013, 6:55 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: If so many starters were out ]

and yet again...do you even look up a single thing before typing...first you say we lost to GA Tech...WRONG...then "barely beat NC State"??

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=323220228
"Tajh Boyd accounts for 8 TDs as Clemson roughs up NC State"
NC State 48
Clemson 62

Your beloved ESECPN didn't seem to see it that way:
"CLEMSON, S.C. -- Clemson is somewhere it hasn't been in more than 20 years, riding an offense that keeps shattering records every week.

On Saturday, it was quarterback Tajh Boyd's eight touchdowns -- five passing and three rushing -- that led the No. 11 Tigers to a 62-48 win over North Carolina State."

Go back to your pen....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

fun


Aug 22, 2013, 10:21 AM

All in all, this was fun. Nothing gets me more excited than friendly trash talking. You guys dont back down. This isn't anything to be at each others necks about, so i can say this was entertaining, and i cant wait til the 31st. I hope yall have a good season though. I'll be back next Saturday or Sunday to either admit defeat, or say "told you so." See ya!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's ok


Aug 22, 2013, 10:24 AM

We've seen enough of you turd sniffer

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

cool


Aug 22, 2013, 10:29 AM

Before you guys get this image of me as a 40 year old following 18-21 year olds around, that's not me lol. Just a college sophomore, having fun, getting this rivalry a little juiced. Usually we save the heated words for those Jean short wearin Florida fans.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Don't worry, we don't............


Aug 22, 2013, 10:46 AM

think you're 40 years old following 18-21 year olds around......... butt-sniffin', leg-humpin' dogs don't live that long.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 108
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic