Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Our NET rating is 42
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 1

Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 6:54 PM

Some, NCS better than that.
Some bullchit is goin on....????

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The media and the committee loves the mid majors***


Mar 17, 2019, 6:56 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: The media and the committee loves the mid majors***


Mar 17, 2019, 7:15 PM

This, scanning the bracket lead me to think they preferred the mids.

Still scratching my head with Oklahoma How is 19 wins and 7th in the BXIiffy. Oh well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

it’s 35 not 42***


Mar 17, 2019, 6:58 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:06 PM

To me it just shows that the NET is a flawed ranking. We’re higher in the ranking because we’ve had so many close losses. The ultimate goal is to win games however, and to beat quality teams. We’re 1-10 against quad 1 teams, and really only have 2 wins over quality teams on the season.

How anyone can argue that we were screwed out of getting in is beyond me.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:11 PM

How many quality wins does Belmont have?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:14 PM

Their only one was Murray State who was in their conference.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:16 PM

And how many games did they play against top 4 seeds?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:25 PM [ in reply to Re: Our NET rating is 42 ]

They do have 2 Q1 wins which is 1 more than we had. I’m sure you could argue against quite a few teams in the field but that doesn’t change the fact that we lost nearly every game against decent opponents this year. We have nobody to blame but ourselves.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:29 PM

One of their quad 1 wins was against lipscomb, who we beat. Guess we should have scheduled wofford instead of USuC.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our NET rating is 42


Mar 17, 2019, 7:16 PM

we might as well be a poor kid tying to get into Stanford Bengaline.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah, I know...was not expecting it


Mar 17, 2019, 7:27 PM

But the committee deciding who gets in just makes up chit as they go..

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 11
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic