Re: Now you don't trust Mueller?

ClemsonTiger1988® said:

Boy, you're blown about by every wind. No new data has surfaced except Mueller didn't find evidence of collusion. After nearly three years of all your favorite people saying collusion Mueller said it didn't happen.

Perhaps you'd like to chit on our constitution and declare Trump guilty until proven innocent. Say.

Of course I trust Mueller. I'll say it again, I'm confused as to how you can only draw 2 conclusions, those most favorable to Trump (1 erroneous) from a 400 page report.

Mueller clearly said he could not exonerate Trump from obstruction so he referred it to Congress, not the Attorney General. He listed 10 examples.

Trump's hand picked AG and Dept. AG concluded that no charges would be brought.

Mueller did not say collusion didn't happen, quite the contrary. He said a criminal conspiracy could not be proven.

Honestly, read the report and still tell me you continue to support this horribly flawed man as your President. You 401K notwithstanding

ClemsonTiger1988®

Oculus Spirit [93618]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 95395

Joined: 12/25/09

Apr 24, 2019, 2:09 PM

We've spent two years confusing the definition of collusion. You and I are colluding right now. All of a sudden the left wants to return to the denotations of collusion after spending two years using their own twisted connotation. You guys need leg day at the gym. That goal post on this investigation is going to get heavy if you keep shifting it after Trump crosses it.

The left keeps pounding on 10 examples of obstruction but none here, absolutely not one will discuss those ten examples as individual incidents. That's not how a trial goes and it's no way to participate in debate.

You list the 10 incidents, actions by Trump or examples of Trump obstructing justice then you and I can discuss them like friends.

In my lifetime we have never had a POTUS who wasn't horribly flawed. It's probably because we elect humans to government. Jesus doesn't get involved in politics and He's working on setting up a kingdom in which you and I won't have to have conflict of opinion because our opinions will coincide because they coincide with his. It's called the reflexive property.

Until then we're going to continue to elect one of us horribly flawed humans to the office of POTUS. You just want one who covers it up better than Trump but I'm just glad we have one who is concerned about the working class and growing our economy.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

In the end Nadler's point became valid.

Re: In the end Nadler's point became valid.

Re: In the end Nadler's point became valid.

Now you don't trust Mueller?