»
Topic: Not buying UGA
Replies: 44   Last Post: Oct 8, 2017 2:00 PM by: TigerDaveOrange
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 44  

Not buying UGA

[3]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 9:59 AM
 

They play only two teams in the regular season that will finish in the top 25. A 1pt. win at Notre Dame and a future date with Auburn from the West. The SEC is playing the most pathetic football I've ever seen and yes this includes the ACC during the Bowden era.

2019 orange level member

Re: Not buying UGA

[2]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:01 AM
 

They look good to me. I think they will give Bama a game for sure.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Not buying UGA

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:03 AM
 

Bama will destroy them all Uga has is a run game which is bamas strength


Re: Not buying UGA

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:26 AM
 

I believe UGA is better than A&M. They run better and throw better. They have a much better D.


Re: Not buying UGA

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:01 AM
 

Yeah I’m not sold on several top ten teams. Really untested weak schedules. First time they play real teams they lose.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:25 AM
 

Not even Clemson is perfect right now. Weak kicking game (again) and need to work on passing deep.

Luckily Bama and UGA lean heavily on the run game and run defense is a strength for all of AU, Bama, and UGA. IMO UGA has no shot at beating Bama or Auburn.
AU on the other hand has a lot of balance which makes them more adaptable in these big games.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:44 PM
 

> Not even Clemson is perfect right now. Weak kicking
> game (again) and need to work on passing deep.
>
> Luckily Bama and UGA lean heavily on the run game and
> run defense is a strength for all of AU, Bama, and
> UGA. IMO UGA has no shot at beating Bama or Auburn.
>
> AU on the other hand has a lot of balance which makes
> them more adaptable in these big games.

9 out of the last 11 says we have a shot versus Au so not sure if your serious or ignorant. I guess ole Kirby can coach after all....where's the naysayers claiming CKS was a bad hire? lol! Kirby's got his team in the Top 5 with one and a half recruiting classes....yikes!!!


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:13 PM
 

the problem was never recruits. It was always coaching. UGA has had the recruits to win it all on several occasions.


Why are you here???


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:19 PM
 

Nobody gives a }%%* what you or your butt-sniffing buddies think. Make it to the CFP and then bark from the porch.


They have a good run game and a fast defense. That will

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:25 AM
 

beat most teams if you take care of the ball. Maybe not BAMA, but most teams.


Re: They have a good run game and a fast defense. That will

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:30 AM
 

UGa vs Auburn should be interesting.


I have to disagree

[2]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:29 AM
 

UGA is the 3rd best team in the country. They have a true freshman QB, have a stable of backs that are outstanding, a road grading Oline that can run block, a couple of receivers that can actually cat h the ball and a defense that is physical and talented. Granted a lot of the SEC sux right now but they've blown out just about everyone they e played.

military_donation.jpg

Penn State is better than Uggs


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:15 AM
 

but they have a much tougher schedule


No they aren't. Their lines are weak and it showed...


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:56 PM
 

... against Iowa especially, which they almost lost. Iowa is not good btw. PSU hasn't played a ranked team and won't until OSU - and they will lose even though OSU isn't all that.

Barkley is the only thing keeping them afloat. Guy's a beast. One injury to them will be the equivalent of an iceberg to the Titanic.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.


Re: I have to disagree

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:29 AM
 

Anybody with a good (not great) team would look great playing in the SEC......Georgia is over-rated just like their conference.....Go Tigers!!!!!!


Re: I have to disagree


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:56 PM
 

> Anybody with a good (not great) team would look great
> playing in the SEC......Georgia is over-rated just
> like their conference.....Go Tigers!!!!!!

Never mind the facts but the SEC is 4-1 versus the ACC this season.

http://www.fbschedules.com/2017/08/2017-college-football-strength-of-schedule-rankings-espn-fpi/

According to the preseason ESPN FPI, the California Golden Bears have the toughest schedule for the 2017 season. Georgia is second, followed by LSU, Florida, and South Carolina.

The SEC leads the ESPN FPI strength of schedule rankings with nine teams in the Top 25. The SEC is followed by the Pac-12 (7), ACC (6), Big 12 (1), Big Ten (1) and Notre Dame.

Below are the top 25 toughest 2017 college football schedules as ranked by the ESPN FPI, followed by 26 through 130.

1. California
2. Georgia
3. LSU
4. Florida
5. South Carolina
6. USC
7. Stanford
8. UCLA
9. Arizona State
10. Georgia Tech
11. Alabama
12. Utah
13. Florida State
14. Mississippi State
15. Vanderbilt
16. Texas A&M
17. NC State
18. Oregon State
19. Auburn
20. Clemson
21. Wake Forest
22. Notre Dame
23. Duke
24. Texas Tech
25. Maryland


Re: I have to disagree


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:03 PM
 

the facts are the SEC sucks and you know it.....Go Tigers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Re: I have to disagree


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:22 PM
 

Fact - This Clemson fan doesn't give 2 sheets about the ACC.
Fact - Despite that - reigning national champs = Clemson = ACC team

Having a tough schedule doesn't necessarily make you better. It does,however, make you more likely to lose. Schedule toughness lately has been heavily SEC biased, in my opinion, because of ESPN's affiliation with the SEC. Less biased outlets' schedule toughness look quite a bit different.

Fact is that the south is where championships are won. The last few years tell us that Clemson, Alabama, FSU, and Ohio state are the best teams. The ACC has been present the most and have beaten the SEC the most at the highest level (FSU>Auburn, Clem>Bama).

I think it's great that Georgia is playing better. They are my second favorite team to watch. Here's hoping UGA makes it to the SECCG and gets by Bama.


FPI LOL


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:40 PM
 

The fact you had to use a metric that has had Ohio State #1 all season is laughable. That list is a joke. The fact it has SC and LSU as top 5....lawd. Georgia is good, but haven't truly played a very good team yet.


I have to disagree

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:30 AM
 

UGA is the 3rd best team in the country. They have a true freshman QB, have a stable of backs that are outstanding, a road grading Oline that can run block, a couple of receivers that can actually cat h the ball and a defense that is physical and talented. Granted a lot of the SEC sux right now but they've blown out just about everyone they e played.

military_donation.jpg

I'm buying UGA based on available info


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:30 AM
 

Theyve been pretty dominant and I'm a believer that at the end if the year that ND win will be more impressive.

As far as who is left standing after Auburn, UGA, and Alabama have their way with each other - who knows?

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Think they are the 3rd best team in

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:32 AM
 

The country.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: Think they are the 3rd best team in


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:34 AM
 

They haven’t played anybody I’ll give you Notre Dame a game they won by a point.


Re: Think they are the 3rd best team in


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:46 AM
 

The real test will be vs auburn defense.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

only means untested,they blew out nobodies***


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:55 AM
 




No, they are good.***

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 10:38 AM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:01 AM
 

I do buy them as a potential top 25 team right now, but that's it. A top 10 team? NO WAY.

So far they've played one decent top 25 type team in ND. To date, UGA's schedule is so weak due to the SEC East it's impossible to tell if they're legit.

I expect we won't know until they play a real team like Auburn.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:27 AM
 

They should pass the pee cup around too. I don't think Dabo would put up with someone busted for weed twice!

Keep playing them Kirvy! Crooked bast@rds

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:32 AM
 

Georgia is definitely the best team in the east, and may be the best team in the SEC. That championship game is going to be great to watch. Bama will have to play a near mistake/turnover free game to win.


I think Georgia is pretty good...


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:37 AM
 

I'm not sure if they are a legitimate top five team, based largely on the other teams they've faced, but I do think they are pretty solid.





2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM
 

UGA or Auburn cannot beat Bama - and nobody in the SEC can beat CLEMSON.

You heard it here first. :)

LOL


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:52 AM
 

If Clemson can only put up 14 @ home against Auburn, then they'll have a tough time with Bama and Georgia's defense.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:03 PM
 

14 points was all we needed and everybody knew it!


We saving the 50+ games for the coots!***

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:10 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:11 PM
 

^^^ Either did not watch the game, or did not understand the strategy to win that game. It was a chess match and CLEMSON played it to WIN IT, not try to keep scoring. Oh well - maybe next time you can watch closer.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 2:00 PM
 

Incorrect. Auburn has a good defense, and Clemson was still working on offensive identity.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:14 PM
 

> UGA or Auburn cannot beat Bama - and nobody in the
> SEC can beat CLEMSON.
>
> You heard it here first. :)
>
> LOL

Our series history.....as in "recent" says otherwise. To think any ranked team has no chance to beat another is quite narrow-minded. Georgia's defense will give them a chance in every contest.....just like Bama's and Clemson's.


Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:46 AM
 

Maybe not, but even barring a loss to Auburn, who in the East is going to beat them?
I say they win the East, and play Bama.If they win the Sec Championship, even with a loss
to Auburn, I don't know you keep them out of the 4 team playoff.


The $-EZ is NOT going to get two teams in the CFP...


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:54 AM
 

and certainly not a Georgia team with a regular season loss to Auburn (possibly the only opponent they'll face who ends-up being ranked) and a loss to Bama in the $-EZ Championship game.

A one loss Oklahoma or Penn State would get in ahead of a two-loss Georgia.





2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Hard to say


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:51 AM
 

UGA RB's and QB's are solid. Defense has been solid. Looking for UGA to run table and lose to Bama by approx. 13.

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Not buying UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 11:56 AM
 

UGA is a top 10 team for sure. Their D is really good and Fromm is making plays when it counts. He is freshman and getting better. Do not let our hatred for them cloud your judgement. Their schedule sets up nicely.


Hatred? Reality! Their schedule sets up nicely is


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:14 PM
 

an understatement. Embarrassing weak.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Beating a 5 - 1 Notre Dame team in South Bend ...

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:28 PM
 

is not eye-popping at this point but it is a good win.

We'll find out a little more about Notre Dame in the coming weeks when they face Southern Cal, NC State and Miami

They also have what I consider to be a solid win against Michigan State.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


No hatred for UGA


Posted: Oct 8, 2017 12:49 PM
 

IMO, their schedule sets up like Ohio State last year and Oklahoma the year before.


Message was edited by: bowlhunter®


2019 orange level member

The same can be said for Bama

[1]
Posted: Oct 8, 2017 1:20 PM
 

now that FSU is out of the top 25 Auburn is the ONLY ranked team on their schedule...


Replies: 44  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: North Carolina
FOR SALE: 6 together in Clemson section 210 row U, $145/ticket or best offer

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
5535 people have read this post