|
Replies: 154
| visibility 51
|
Orange Blooded [3462]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 5156
Joined: 9/12/10
|
Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 8:04 AM
|
|
Am I the only one who is confused as to why Walt let's this person on his show and makes a big fuss over her? She sounds like a bimbo. If you look at her Facebook page, she clearly blames Republicans for the Orlando shooting. How disgraceful! I no longer care to hear her again. Anyone else fed up with her?
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5508]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 3806
Joined: 8/23/13
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 8:33 AM
|
|
She's not good on the radio. I think he must have a crush on her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 8:36 AM
|
|
Shouldn't the pro gun group get the blame when there is gun violence because of their lax gun laws?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57049]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39674
Joined: 11/12/04
|
abortion kills almost 200 innocents every day in Florida
Jun 13, 2016, 8:42 AM
|
|
ISIS doesn't even come close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: abortion kills almost 200 innocents every day in Florida
Jun 13, 2016, 8:43 AM
|
|
What does this have to do with gun violence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57049]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39674
Joined: 11/12/04
|
didn't the ISIS guy use a gun? wasn't that your point? just
Jun 13, 2016, 8:46 AM
|
|
showing some perspective if you are going to bring up legalities. unless, some deaths mean less to you than others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: didn't the ISIS guy use a gun? wasn't that your point? just
Jun 13, 2016, 8:53 AM
|
|
If you want to blame democrats for abortion and republicans for the mass shootings that's fair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57049]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39674
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Re: didn't the ISIS guy use a gun? wasn't that your point? just
Jun 13, 2016, 9:07 AM
|
|
what does this have to do with Republicans and Democrats?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [193]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 449
Joined: 2/27/14
|
It's the last push for gun laws. Once people start to realize
Jun 13, 2016, 10:26 AM
|
|
That anyone with a cheap CAD machine and a program can make an untraceable AK 47 in their garage. If you believe the terrorist organizations are that organized and that well funded then finding a few thousand $ to get one of these going would be cake. Look it up before you bash me and tell me I'm an idiot this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [963]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 1176
Joined: 12/14/11
|
Re: It's the last push for gun laws. Once people start to realize
Jun 13, 2016, 10:34 AM
|
|
They ARE well organized and have plenty of money coming in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53754]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43551
Joined: 11/17/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Well Ole Spud
Jun 13, 2016, 10:08 AM
|
|
If'n they take away your gun , then YOU are not protected and THEY are (with your gun).
That seems awfully easy to understand to me .
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: I will never understand how or why you anti gun people think
Jun 13, 2016, 10:33 AM
|
|
Quick question ...do you own a gun ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I will never understand how or why you anti gun people think
Jun 13, 2016, 10:34 AM
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60209]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I'd be on board if I ever heard ONE plan offered
Jun 13, 2016, 11:12 AM
|
|
up by the anti-gun people to accomplish "taking away" everybody's guns. If you could snap your fingers and "poof" all guns were gone, I'd have no problem with it. When nobody else has a gun, I'd happily turn mine over, because this would be a wonderful world.
But this magical plan to just take guns away from bad people is just fantasy, like most plans offered up by the folks not in complete touch with reality.
Hey, maybe if you make the "NO GUNS" signs BIG enough, and in Braille, yeah, maybe THAT would work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24948]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32285
Joined: 2/15/09
|
The guy who shot up the nightclub
Jun 13, 2016, 11:17 AM
|
|
was on FBI watch list and yet still was able to get an automatic gun that can shoot several rounds without reloading. For what purpose does any man need a gun like that?
also in this case why didn't anybody shoot him? It was a nightclub was it not? Those type of places usually attract vigilantes who are packing yet still nobody shot the shooter like everyone always says would happen if other people had guns
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
He did not buy an "automatic" rifle. Good grief.***
Jun 13, 2016, 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: He did not by an "automatic" rifle. Good grief.***
Jun 13, 2016, 11:38 AM
|
|
If only the people calling to ban automatic weapons knew how hard and expensive it is to legally obtain one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24948]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32285
Joined: 2/15/09
|
but a guy on an FBI watch list
Jun 13, 2016, 11:41 AM
|
|
can get one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30776]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34472
Joined: 6/22/03
|
Yes.. easily. Are you on fbi watch list?
Jun 13, 2016, 11:47 AM
|
|
Go buy a gun..give it to me. I'm on list and don't want to chance it.
Go to shady dealer who doesn't check.
Bought gun before being put on list.
Bought gun from Crack head in alley who isn't on list.
Stole gun
Steal identity, Use fake id
Just because you are on a list doesn't mean the fbi has a person following you around 24/7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1005
Joined: 10/22/13
|
Exactly
Jun 13, 2016, 8:52 PM
|
|
What blows my mind is that people continue to ignore the fact that this guy was a proclaimed terrorist and a member of ISIS. This guy was going to get a gun so that he could shoot the place up no matter how many watch list he was on or how many weapons bans were put in place. There was nothing that was going to stop this guy from going in that club to slaughter as many people as he could other than if we locked up every person that was on an FBI list for the rest of their lives.
Also the continued saying that this was an automatic assault rifle is just ignorant. I do not understand how hard it is for the majority of the public to identify the difference between a semi-automatic gun and a true military fully automatic rifle. It is not an assault rifle its just a rifle. People are going to be in shock if when the day comes that they ban AR-15's and some one is still shooting people with a semi-automatic rifle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: but a guy on an FBI watch list
Jun 13, 2016, 11:47 AM
[ in reply to but a guy on an FBI watch list ] |
|
You'd would have to talk to his county sheriff (or other chief law enforcement officer) on why he approved his application for a class III Tax stamp, that is only one of the steps in the long and rigorous process to obtain an automatic weapon, legally of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
No, it's pretty obvious Just the T_I_P has no effing
Jun 13, 2016, 12:21 PM
|
|
clue what he's talking about
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
none at all***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: He did not by an "automatic" rifle. Good grief.***
Jun 13, 2016, 12:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: He did not by an "automatic" rifle. Good grief.*** ] |
|
Actually it is just pretty obvious he like you are just idiot anti gun nuts who spout off about thigns they obviously know nothing about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
I have found when talking with a lot of anti-gun folks that
Jun 13, 2016, 12:46 PM
[ in reply to Re: He did not by an "automatic" rifle. Good grief.*** ] |
|
they do not know the difference. If the guy really wanted to clear the room and make a bloodbath he could have brought in 2 tactical shotguns and buckshot shells and hammered the place. The same shotgun Joe Biden said to go buy instead of a pistol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I have found when talking with a lot of anti-gun folks that
Jun 13, 2016, 12:48 PM
|
|
I agree that I often hear people making the same mistake.
However, it doesn't really change he point. There is no need for a semi-automatic weapon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
So bolt/lever action, revolver and muskets only?
Jun 13, 2016, 1:07 PM
|
|
Every pistol out there today is basically semi-automatic. Even my old .22 squirrel gun from my youth is semi-auto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139902]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33851
Joined: 12/5/10
|
There are plenty of reasons to own a semi-automatic
Jun 13, 2016, 1:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: I have found when talking with a lot of anti-gun folks that ] |
|
weapon.
Growing up in rural SC everyone I knew had shotguns. We didn't dress up in combat fatigues, buy assault rifles, or ever once think of the gun as anything but a recreational tool. We'd all gather on Saturday mornings and deer hunt. We'd get a call from a neighbor inviting us to come dove hunting because he had plenty of birds in a corn field he just cut. We weren't out doing drugs, fighting, drinking, or causing trouble. Not once did we ever consider doing anything with those guns that would get us in trouble. Why? Because we knew carrying those guns was a privilege, that our dads would take them away from us if we didn't walk the line. We were good kids who respected the person's land we were on, the guns we were shooting, and the game we were shooting at (missing mostly). There were valuable lessons in those guns.
I get that not everyone grew up that way. I get that not everyone has the same respect and appreciation for their gun(s) as we did. But, there is a marked difference between what I described above, and what you are condemning. Yet, I don't see where you are distinguishing between the two. Maybe it was an oversight on your part. Maybe you do feel all "semi-automatic" guns are bad and all folks who own them are gun nuts. I don't see it that way. I see lumping everything into one category as a slippery slope. I see an unwillingness to see the other point of view as lazy. Can more be done to ensure guns don't fall into the hands of those who mean to do harm, absolutely. But should I not be able to pass down to my son the Remington 1100 "semi automatic" shotgun that my grandfather gave my father when he graduated high school, and my father gave me when I did the same? That "semi-automatic" has taught valuable lessons about respect to two generations. It would be a shame to let the actions of a very few change that. I hope that's something you can get.
"There is no reason for a semi-automatic weapon." I guess that's all a matter of perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
Well said.***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: There are plenty of reasons to own a semi-automatic
Jun 13, 2016, 2:11 PM
[ in reply to There are plenty of reasons to own a semi-automatic ] |
|
I do see the other side.
But I also know you don't need a semi automatic shotgun to go "bird" hunting.
While your personal story sounds great. There are plenty of murderers that grew up in the same circumstances, learned the same lessons, and still eventually used those weapons on others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139902]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33851
Joined: 12/5/10
|
No, you don't "need" a semi automatic shotgun, but
Jun 13, 2016, 2:30 PM
|
|
there are only three options...
1) Single shot
2) Double Barrel
3) Semi Automatic
I personally shoot a double barrel, but have no issue with any of the above.
As far as your last comment, it sounds like you are making the case that guns used for hunting aren't the common denominator? I tend to agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [559]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 434
Joined: 2/6/14
|
Re: No, you don't "need" a semi automatic shotgun, but
Jun 13, 2016, 9:29 PM
|
|
4) Pump action
Don't be leaving out the best of em all
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: The guy who shot up the nightclub
Jun 13, 2016, 11:44 AM
[ in reply to The guy who shot up the nightclub ] |
|
1. It wasn't an automatic weapon.
2. Have your right to bear arms taken away without due process is completely unconstitutional.
3. responsible gun owners (people who have CWPs) know that it is a felony to carry a gun while drinking. It's even a felony in some states to carry in a bar while being sober, I'm not sure of the Florida laws though. EDIT: just looked it up it is in fact illegal to carry on a night club in the state of Florida.
Message was edited by: CU_Kobe_24®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
It took place in a gun free zone, nobody was permitted
Jun 13, 2016, 12:04 PM
[ in reply to The guy who shot up the nightclub ] |
|
to carry in the night club. And there have been many instances where a private citizen with a concealed carry has prevented mass shootings like this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1806]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1888
Joined: 1/31/12
|
Typical nightclub, yes. Homosexual nightclub, probably not
Jun 13, 2016, 1:19 PM
[ in reply to The guy who shot up the nightclub ] |
|
I thought the exact same thing at first. Why would no one else pull out a gun and stop him. However most bars and nightclubs ban weapons of any kind. While these rules are typically broken at many nightclubs, I do not think that would be the case at a primarily homosexual nightclub that would have a very large amount of unarmed patrons who, for the most part, stand against widespread gun ownership.
This situation reminds me of the terrorist attack in France where the gunmen were allowed to go on shooting sprees completely unopposed by citizens because no one in France owns a gun. It seems like the terrorist here knew that he would probably not face any opposition in the nightclub in terms of return gun fire until the police arrived. At that point, the damage was done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60209]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
unfortunately, that's why these horrible things happen
Jun 13, 2016, 1:32 PM
|
|
overwhelmingly in bars, movie theaters, schools, churches, post offices, etc. The places where firearms are banned by law or a cute little 16"x 16" sign. The crazy guy is smart enough to know where he can go with almost no resistance because the law-abiding citizen does something truly dumb - he abides by the law.
You ever go to a gun show or a gun store with a shooting range? Despite guns and ammo just laying out in plain sight for anyone to buy and/or just pick up - even those ghastly semi-automatics solely responsible for mayhem everywhere - there is almost zero chance of a shooting massacre happening. The shooter knows he wouldn't last 5 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: unfortunately, that's why these horrible things happen
Jun 13, 2016, 2:18 PM
|
|
What a load of BS.
Even Chris Kyle got murdered at a gun range.
13 people were killed in a mass shooting on Fort Hood.
Nowhere is safe from mass shootings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30776]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34472
Joined: 6/22/03
|
William Brice in the 3rd qrt is pretty safe
Jun 13, 2016, 2:29 PM
|
|
Ain't nobody around. .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
yes***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60209]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
yeah, he just fortified my point even more
Jun 13, 2016, 2:40 PM
|
|
if he was any more of a sheep he'd have to be sheared twice a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Then what ##### kind of point is that coot trying to make?
Jun 13, 2016, 2:48 PM
[ in reply to yes*** ] |
|
Do my knowledge, the following mass shootings took place in a gun free zone:
Columbine
Fort Hood
Virginia Tech
San Bernadino
Aurora
Sandy Hook
AME Church massacre
USMC Recruiting Station shooting
Orlando
Meanwhile mass shootings were avoided thanks to private citizens carrying guns in Anniston AL, Pear MS, Edinboro PA, Colorado Springs CO, and some mall in Oregon (per an old WSJ article I read a long time ago).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
a poor one? It's kind of his thing***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
What about it?***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: What about it?***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:02 PM
|
|
This is what happens when people actually practice what you preach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
So you cherry pick one instance in a domestic dispute
Jun 13, 2016, 3:20 PM
|
|
where the shooter was in his car and trying to leave, and a guy got shot and killed...versus the multiple examples in public areas I provided where mass shootings were avoided?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: So you cherry pick one instance in a domestic dispute
Jun 13, 2016, 3:26 PM
|
|
You don't realize you're cherry picking...
The overall data shows concealed weapons don't decrease gun violence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
where is your data?***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
I provided 5 examples of a mass shooting being avoided
Jun 13, 2016, 3:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: So you cherry pick one instance in a domestic dispute ] |
|
You gave one example of a guy getting shot during a domestic dispute, and you don't see the difference? Also, you are completely wrong about the data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I provided 5 examples of a mass shooting being avoided
Jun 13, 2016, 3:32 PM
|
|
Unfortunately I'm not.
Otherwise we would just arm everyone with guns and end gun violence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
So link to your data?***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
he would have led with it if he had it...He doesn't so he is
Jun 13, 2016, 3:37 PM
|
|
dancing now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Wasn't Fort Hood a gun free zone?***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:50 PM
[ in reply to Wasn't Fort Hood a gun free zone?*** ] |
|
The first casualties of the Fort Hood shooting were armed security personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
That's not what I asked.***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: That's not what I asked.***
Jun 13, 2016, 2:59 PM
|
|
It's just sad you think that a random guy with a CWP would have been able to do something trained security forces couldn't do...
Let that sink in. You're literally trying to argue that an average joe is better than trained security officers.
It's no wonder you're making such an illogical argument today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Ok, let's review...
Jun 13, 2016, 3:10 PM
|
|
So the first casualties according to you were armed security guards? This means the shooter took out the armed people first, leaving everyone else sitting ducks. But if everyone was armed, would that have been the case?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Ok, let's review...
Jun 13, 2016, 3:15 PM
|
|
How could he take them out if they had guns?
Guns always get the bad guy before he gets you, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [37023]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16328
Joined: 12/15/08
|
You're just being
Jun 13, 2016, 3:25 PM
|
|
an idiot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
it IS his natural state***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Did someone actually say
Jun 13, 2016, 3:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: Ok, let's review... ] |
|
"Guns always get the bad guy before he gets you" or are you making up arguments now?
If you walk into a police station where everyone is armed and open fire, you're going to take a couple officers out before they take you out. The element of surprise will give you enough time to take a couple out.
If you walk into a church or night club where nobody is armed, you'd most likely be able to take out every single person because they are sitting ducks.
Fort Hood is a hybrid of the two. Element of surprise lets someone take out the armed guards. But in that case, there weren't more people armed who could shoot back. Therefore they became more like sitting ducks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
you're using logic to argue with him? He is immune...
Jun 13, 2016, 3:32 PM
|
|
better just stick to his strawman arguments and his made-up statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Yep, strawman arguments hits the nail on the head
Jun 13, 2016, 3:35 PM
|
|
It's basically all the left can do anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Yep, strawman arguments hits the nail on the head
Jun 13, 2016, 3:55 PM
|
|
It's sad you're more focused on telling yourself you're correct instead or understanding why you're wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
as sad as you not being able to provide this "data" you keep
Jun 13, 2016, 3:57 PM
|
|
referencing or as sad as you continually trolling and flaming on a Tiger board? Inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
They're at worst neck and neck***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
How bout a Loser Leaves Town cage match to decide?***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
How can we tell who out-stupids the other?
Jun 13, 2016, 3:46 PM
|
|
Tie defaults to the coot being the loser?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
are you proposing a deathmatch?***
Jun 13, 2016, 3:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
With AR-15's***
Jun 13, 2016, 4:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
Semi-auto so it will take longer?***
Jun 13, 2016, 6:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60209]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
exactly - I assumed the typical anti-gun hand-wringer
Jun 13, 2016, 11:26 AM
|
|
perspective for a minute and wrote what they would say.
It doesn't make any sense, does it?
So tell me HOW you would take all the guns away, by some other means than just wishing them away.....c'mon, you can do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: exactly - I assumed the typical anti-gun hand-wringer
Jun 13, 2016, 11:28 AM
|
|
I would never be able to take away every gun. But does that mean we shouldn't try?
I can never prevent every rape, but it would be dumb to argue ###### someone should be a legal activity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Owning a gun isn't illegal, it's protected
Jun 13, 2016, 12:06 PM
|
|
by the Constitution. Rape is illegal and not protected by the Constitution. Your comparison is not good at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Owning a gun isn't illegal, it's protected
Jun 13, 2016, 12:14 PM
|
|
Thanks captain obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Apparently it takes the obvious to point out that
Jun 13, 2016, 12:17 PM
|
|
comparing gun ownership to rape is ridiculous and absurd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Apparently it takes the obvious to point out that
Jun 13, 2016, 12:22 PM
|
|
It isn't absurd.
You're actually comparing rape to gun violence.
HTH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
It IS absurd, and no...you specifically argued ownership
Jun 13, 2016, 12:29 PM
|
|
"I would never be able to take away every gun. But does that mean we shouldn't try?"
In all actuality, we absolutely should not try to take away every gun. More gun ownership = less gun violence according to historical data and statistics. Diane Feinstein's assault weapons ban legislation expired in 2003 and did absolutely nothing to decrease gun violence. When you take away guns and establish gun free zones, you turn law-abiding citizens into sitting ducks. Exhibit A: Orlando.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: It IS absurd, and no...you specifically argued ownership
Jun 13, 2016, 12:32 PM
|
|
Link to this evidence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: It IS absurd, and no...you specifically argued ownership
Jun 13, 2016, 12:44 PM
|
|
lol oh lord.
How about some research that hasn't already been repudiated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15215]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18246
Joined: 6/10/09
|
Why can't we make everyone pass a written test
Jun 13, 2016, 1:07 PM
|
|
Similar to a drivers test before purchasing your first firearm?
That combined with a much more thorough background check.
Obviously idiots will still obtain firearms but I think that makes a lot of sense from an educational standpoint. Similar to seat belt law, speed limit, drivers license, etc to help make roads safer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
I have no problem with having to take a class or test before
Jun 13, 2016, 1:24 PM
|
|
you purchase your first firearm. The problem I have is this turning into more and more BS from the gov't. It's sad that we have to be so paranoid of our 2nd amendment rights in this climate of constant rhetoric against guns instead of who's doing the killing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3462]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 5156
Joined: 9/12/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
No, that argument means we would have to ban all p.enises
Jun 13, 2016, 12:53 PM
[ in reply to Re: exactly - I assumed the typical anti-gun hand-wringer ] |
|
because a few evil idiots use theirs to harm people. That argument is as insane as take all the guns away. That barn door is already open and the horse left a long time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I will never understand how or why you anti gun people think
Jun 13, 2016, 10:21 PM
|
|
Says the guy who needs a gun to be tuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
Link to where he said that sh!thead....or are you making up
Jun 13, 2016, 11:08 PM
|
|
your facts again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2420]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2471
Joined: 3/26/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Right next to all the "data" he has to prove us wrong***
Jun 13, 2016, 5:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2828]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1926
Joined: 1/9/11
|
Re: I will never understand how or why you anti gun people think
Jun 13, 2016, 11:07 AM
[ in reply to I will never understand how or why you anti gun people think ] |
|
With all due respect Spud, I don't think the goal is too take away guns from mentally stable and educated owners. Just more stringent background checks and licensing requirements. (And) Banning assault rifles other than for the military. There is no need for that type of firepower other than for soldiers in combat. IMHO
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30776]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34472
Joined: 6/22/03
|
I agree .. but that won't fix the problem.
Jun 13, 2016, 11:16 AM
|
|
Just adding oil instead of replacing the gasket.
I can walk into most of my friends houses and walk out with scores of fire arms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15325
Joined: 1/12/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30776]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34472
Joined: 6/22/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [50701]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 17068
Joined: 5/21/08
|
Re: Who do we blame for gamecocks?***
Jun 13, 2016, 11:07 AM
|
|
Probably not Humpty Dumpty... he had his great fall before he hatched.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [81683]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 47109
Joined: 3/18/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3881]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7036
Joined: 9/1/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60209]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
so do you blame lax drivers license laws, or cars themselves
Jun 13, 2016, 8:55 AM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
for all the mayhem on the highways?
Has to be one or the other by your logic, because the specific person who crashes and kills people is not responsible.
Sometimes I wish I was born without common sense, because it would be a much more guilt-free life. Because I could just blame inanimate objects instead of taking personal responsibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: so do you blame lax drivers license laws, or cars themselves
Jun 13, 2016, 10:29 AM
|
|
If you truly had common sense you wouldn't be comparing an automobile to a gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
and if you truly had any common sense you would realize this
Jun 13, 2016, 2:29 PM
|
|
isn't random gun violence but a motivated terrorist act, but that doesn't fit your agenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 8:56 AM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
I think you've misjudged the TNet constituency.
Badly .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 8:58 AM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
Why are you here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [37023]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16328
Joined: 12/15/08
|
If the Government can make a "No Fly" list for terrorists
Jun 13, 2016, 9:55 AM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
don't you think they could make a "No Gun" list for them too? This guy was a terrorist suspect a few years ago and was able to pull this off as a known threat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [338]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 1013
Joined: 9/16/11
|
Not really a terrorist
Jun 13, 2016, 10:07 AM
|
|
The investigation will bring out more details, but the stuff that's out now suggests that he's much more anti gay than pro Islamic state. He's got some sympathy for the group, but I think that it's more that he's against the personal freedoms we enjoy in this country.
There's an argument that the religious right is at least partly responsible for this attack because of their anti-LGBT rhetoric, but it's a pretty weak argument. I'd guess that their impact is tangential at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [131]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 67
Joined: 10/9/11
|
The real problem here is our antiquated Constitution...
Jun 13, 2016, 11:45 AM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
We simply SHOULD NOT allow Chickens to have free speech on our board!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
Classless09 is a liberal anti constitution nut job... I am shocked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:30 PM
|
|
lol the fact I don't want 49 people murdered in a mass shooting makes me anti-constitution?
I like that troll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:32 PM
|
|
You are right making guns illegal to own in a place really makes people safe. Chicago is an amazingly peaceful place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:36 PM
|
|
Is Chicago not in the US?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:38 PM
|
|
Are guns not illegal to own there?
What about at your safe spaces like college campuses
Message was edited by: Clemalum07®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
do you ever get tired of having your ### handed to you?
Jun 13, 2016, 2:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
I'm beginning to think you enjoy the abuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 10:10 PM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
lax of gun laws?????? It was a no gun zone you moron. How many lives could have been saved if the bartender had a double barrel behind the bar and shot him full of buckshot when this crap started ??? You lib breathing ####
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 10:15 PM
|
|
You really think in that hectic crowd the bartender is going to be able to successfully out gun fight the shooter without inflicting more damage on the bystanders?
You watch too many movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 10:25 PM
|
|
#### boy you dumb
But you and killhary have fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [290]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 273
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 8:36 AM
|
|
She's actually really intelligent when it comes to sports....that's probably why he has her on his sports show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15215]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18246
Joined: 6/10/09
|
She makes for awful radio. She's not very bright.
Jun 13, 2016, 8:42 AM
|
|
Or at least she's not very well spoken. It would be like having me or you on radio. Pretty terrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: She makes for awful radio. She's not very bright.
Jun 13, 2016, 8:43 AM
|
|
You don't write good either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12862]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8187
Joined: 3/30/16
|
Re: She makes for awful radio. She's not very bright.
Jun 13, 2016, 8:48 AM
|
|
Hopefully you did that intentionally? 
good/well
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5434]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11911
Joined: 9/23/01
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 10:11 PM
[ in reply to Re: Amber Lee ] |
|
No she's not
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [819]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 1420
Joined: 11/25/14
|
Oh no! She doesn't agree with my
Jun 13, 2016, 8:40 AM
|
|
politics. Get her off the air! Sounds 'Murican to me....??????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8008]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7958
Joined: 6/30/00
|
Simple. She sounds cute and strokes Walt's ego.***
Jun 13, 2016, 8:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [819]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 1420
Joined: 11/25/14
|
The Walt stroking does make it hard
Jun 13, 2016, 8:50 AM
|
|
to listen to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [338]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 1013
Joined: 9/16/11
|
Re: The Walt stroking does make it hard
Jun 13, 2016, 10:02 AM
|
|
I googled Amber Lee and got an "adult content" filter pop up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [337]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 522
Joined: 11/24/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2404]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2336
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Wasn't Amber Lee a porno star in the 80's?***
Jun 13, 2016, 8:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Wasn't Amber Lee a porno star in the 80's?***
Jun 13, 2016, 8:58 AM
|
|
A #### reference from rhe bootiehooker .
All starting to come together .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2404]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2336
Joined: 11/30/98
|
And Tigerdug23® showing his ignorance of Clemson
Jun 13, 2016, 9:30 AM
|
|
football history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: And Tigerdug23® showing his ignorance of Clemson
Jun 13, 2016, 10:05 AM
|
|
Oh no I know the deal ...it just tied in at the moment 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24948]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32285
Joined: 2/15/09
|
Pretty clear that Walt has some type of crush on her
Jun 13, 2016, 11:10 AM
|
|
she is somewhat knowledgable about the NFL but that''s about it. Walt likes her because she like him "calls it like she sees it". She does not fit into the Clemson radio demographic though
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3244]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 2982
Joined: 8/26/99
|
Re: Pretty clear that Walt has some type of crush on her
Jun 13, 2016, 1:15 PM
|
|
Neither does Walt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [682]
TigerPulse: 87%
Posts: 1003
Joined: 9/8/14
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 11:17 AM
|
|
I've quit listening to Walt so Amber Lee isn't on my radar. I can't get past the host
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
She def has the face for radio
Jun 13, 2016, 11:33 AM
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1116]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 1934
Joined: 1/20/10
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:27 PM
|
|
Gun Control: Ability to hit the target. Everything else is a moot point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Amber Lee
Jun 13, 2016, 12:28 PM
|
|
Shocking classless09 is an anti constitution nut bag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
but not shocking at all that he is here trolling...in a
Jun 13, 2016, 2:49 PM
|
|
non-coot related thread...what a liar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
Am I the only one who just get a hankering for a
Jun 13, 2016, 3:02 PM
|
|
panini?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1005
Joined: 10/22/13
|
Not sure why she even agrees to go on the show
Jun 13, 2016, 8:57 PM
|
|
when she does call in she sounds like the most uninterested person I've ever heard on the radio. She's constantly distracted and pays no attention to what Walt is talking about or is clueless to what he even said when he ask her a question. It's like she's obligated to be on the show but would rather be doing anything else in the world other than talking to Walt. Plus, she is clueless about sports let claims to be some type of sports writer. She knows less about what's going on in the world of sports than Ramona, at least Ramona tries and plays along. She is a waste of air space and an instant channel turn whenever Walt has her on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 154
| visibility 51
|
|
|
50
