Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
New Story: Projected Starters: Offense
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 12
| visibility 1

New Story: Projected Starters: Offense


Feb 24, 2015, 3:48 PM

 
Projected Starters: Offense

Spring practice begins next week and several position battles are up in there as the Tigers begin a month-long process that ends with the annual spring game on April 11th. Before we head into the spring, however, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at what I think the starting lineups would look like if the season started today. Full Story »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You hit the nail on the head


Feb 24, 2015, 4:13 PM

This is how I called it several times.


For me, it starts at OL* I have little doubt the staff will find a good starting 5, but
what about depth? That's a concern.


At Wide receiver, I know a lot of folks don't wanna hear this, but the time is now for
Peake** I have no doubt he will be pushed HARD by Thompson, "CAIN" and McCloud. Going
be really hard to fend those off for long.

RUNNING BACK...
I agree, Gallman starts to begin with. But I like Choice and Fuller, and even Dye-like
you said. Making a run as well.

What about QB? Israel going be the back-up?


Just some thoughts...


#21

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: New Story: Projected Starters: Offense


Feb 24, 2015, 4:15 PM

Was hoping to read more of a plug-play assessment where we could see where you may think some of the new recruits could plug in and why they could be a projected starter over what was there, from a writer's point of view. Understood it's hard to know until practice starts, but would be interesting to see your view on where you think it could look by Game 1.

Barely saw Cain mentioned, but didn't see RRM-III mentioned at all (though he could be in the WR or RB mix). Only 3 WR's named, but we play with 4....so who's the likely 4th guy by an early assessment of skill? Is it literally that all 3 OL we picked up would all 3 be competing for the exact same spot where Gore is? Or is there another spot one of them is suited for and could push for time at?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: New Story: Projected Starters: Offense