»
Topic: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble
Replies: 15   Last Post: Oct 17, 2019 8:43 PM by: prudentialtiger
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 15  

Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble

[2]
Posted: Oct 17, 2019 12:31 AM
 

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/27859502/big-12-fines-texas-tech-ad-officiating-talk


2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 1:42 AM
 

I thought all turnovers were reviewable. Evidently only the ones ruled to be turnovers are reviewable; the refs are free to blow all calls that contain a potential turnover.

So Baylor should have been tagged with the loss.


Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 7:43 AM
 

Although the ruling was incorrect, it wasn’t a turnover. The rule applied was similar to a false start which stops the play.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 9:24 AM
 

My understanding is that the reason it was not a turnover is because the ref blew the call.

He didn't blow the whistle before the fumble; he incorrectly asserted that Fruh had committed a snap infraction before the fumble. My understanding is that video evidence, were it allowable, would have allowed the turnover to stand.

Baylor loses.


Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble

[1]
Posted: Oct 17, 2019 9:49 AM
 

All of that is true.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

It seems to be like when a ref calls


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 6:19 AM
 

forward progress had stopped before a fumble. The ball is dead then...and that is not reviewable.
In some ways I miss the old days of not stopping a teams momentum to review a play. Just play well and take the officials input out of the game...


The AD didn't violate any rule, imo. He didn't comment on


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 7:54 AM
 

officiating: he commented on the league's rulng of an officiating matter, and even then he was merely confirming what the league had actually done. I wouldn't pay it.

2020 white level member

Exactly

[1]
Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:09 AM
 

He didn't speak poorly of the officiating he just presented facts and confirmed that the entire game would be reviewed. I don't see what the issue is here; especially not a $25,000 fine issue.


Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:12 AM
 

Snapped it into his behind. Didnt see it happen but unreal.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:31 AM
 

I happened to be watching when it happened. The announcers expressed doubt about the ruling. Aside from that snap, Frumorgen played really well. He didn’t miss any blocks that I could see.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Whatever, TT played Baylor tight & looked pretty good.


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:37 AM
 

That's all.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


No, if he COULD see it happening, that would be unreal!


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 9:53 AM
 

That definitely would not be Jake. :)

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Jake Fruhmorgen... name sounds familiar, but not sure.


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:34 AM
 

Maybe now I’ll know him, since he will be the guy who screwed up and snapped a ball into somebody’s backside.

2020 white level membermilitary_donation.jpg

Whatever choice(s) you make makes you. Choose wisely.


Re: Jake Fruhmorgen... dont blink


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:41 AM
 

or you'll miss another transfer

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

He should appeal the fine


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 10:02 AM
 

The AD didn't say anything inappropriate IMO.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: Jake Fruhmorgen caused Texas Tech AD trouble


Posted: Oct 17, 2019 8:43 PM
 

Didn’t know Baylor had a girls school.


Replies: 15  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
4749 people have read this post