|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1,663
|
Orange Blooded [4341]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4968
Joined: 8/6/02
|
Is it just me or does anyone else not worrying about
Dec 15, 2016, 9:36 AM
|
|
OSU's one dimensional offense? We know we are going to score. Do the Buckeyes feel the same way. No. This almost feels like BC with talent. I do think they could crush us over the middle at 5-10 yards with screens and tightend but we can play a bubble all night. They have no downfield threats. Just asking what you guys think.
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6575]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5488
Joined: 9/22/16
|
Re: Is it just me or does anyone else not worrying about
Dec 15, 2016, 9:40 AM
|
|
TBH i was more worried about FSU than I am about OSU right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [20]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 59
Joined: 1/7/16
|
Re: Is it just me or does anyone else not worrying about
Dec 15, 2016, 9:46 AM
|
|
Couldn't agree more, we can get pressure on JT and their oline has been struggling. Like you said our offense can/will score. The one thing that worries me is turnovers, keep that in check then we will be headed to Tampa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14488]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11103
Joined: 4/2/12
|
Anyone who "isnt worried" about anything in a playoff scenario
Dec 15, 2016, 9:48 AM
|
|
Is foolish
Are they an offensive juggernaut? No. But they have dynamic athletes and all it takes is is a couple long runs or busted plays. It will also be tough to score over 40 on them.
That said, I say Tigers win 34 - 24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4341]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4968
Joined: 8/6/02
|
Re: Anyone who "isnt worried" about anything in a playoff scenario
Dec 15, 2016, 9:51 AM
|
|
I understand. But they have no means to stretch the field. I would have worried more playing Washington.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Is it just me or does anyone else not worrying about
Dec 15, 2016, 9:54 AM
|
|
I would never call anything Urban Meyer coaches a " One Dimensional Offense " . He is , as they say ...multiple in what he does from that side of the ball .
Now , we can MAKE them one dimensional from neutralizing the passing or running attack but I disagree that they come that way . I believe they are fairly good at running it , but their weakness is in that medium to deep ball range where Barrett has struggled .
I think our DL and the DB's will be integral to a tight game . Couple of plays here or there will be the difference just the same as our OB meeting in 2013 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4341]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4968
Joined: 8/6/02
|
Re: Is it just me or does anyone else not worrying about
Dec 15, 2016, 10:23 AM
|
|
We cut out the Pi's we are good. They are going throw deep early and often, but if we stop it. We win easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [18]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 46
Joined: 12/3/16
|
Re: Is it just me or does anyone else not worrying about
Dec 15, 2016, 1:22 PM
|
|
They have been one dimensional in that they don't throw the ball downfield effectively. However, they have a multi-faceted running attack which can be very difficult to stop. They can pound the middle with Weber, get to the edge with Samuel, or be crafty with Barrett. It has usually been enough for them to win games. However, from what I've seen, Clemson has a very good defensive line that can make things tough on the running game. The Buckeyes will run the ball, but in order to win the game they'll have to hit on some passing plays further than 10 yards down the field. I guess we'll find out if their passing game improves during this December of development
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [18]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 46
Joined: 12/3/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1,663
|
|
|
50
