»
Topic: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..
Replies: 48   Last Post: Jan 12, 2015 1:59 PM by: UtilTiger
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 48  

NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:16 PM
 

Terrible reversible, Green Bay's left tackle was holding every single pass play, green bays oline as a whole was holding a lot, and Green Bay got away with 4 late hits on Romo.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..

[22]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:17 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:20 PM
 

VanDerbeek is a Panther fan? Who knew?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..

[4]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:21 PM
 



I hope you didnt get sick from the dust on your Dallas gear.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 10:58 PM
 

You got owned with your little crying thingy. No tears here pal. At least my team earned their way into the playoffs not by being the best lousy team in the South.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Congrats you got as far as they did in playoffs

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 10:59 PM
 

and now are both at home

military_donation.jpg

Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..

[1]
Posted: Jan 12, 2015 8:16 AM
 

Panthers earned their way in as well. Guess what our seasons ended the same week.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


So stumbling to the ground is now a "football move"******


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 10:47 AM
 




Re: So stumbling to the ground is now a "football move"******


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 10:53 AM
 

Why is this in response to me?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Seriously he posted that Dawson's creek gif..


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:28 PM
 

How freaking lame. It's only been posted 10 trillion times on tnet

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Seriously he posted that Dawson's creek gif..

[5]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:39 PM
 

I thought I was on ignore. Make up your mind.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Mind?***

[5]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 6:32 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Photobucket is holding my sig pic hostage. Screw them.


Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..

[3]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:22 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

DB23


Internet meme's stopped being funny 7 years ago...

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:25 PM
 

don't know why people still think there is any humor to some one putting whatever text they want to on a pic. Anybody can do it, it's not funny anymore and completely unoriginal

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Internet meme's stopped being funny 7 years ago...

[10]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:26 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Dallas had no business in this game, and America knew it

[10]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:21 PM
 

it was destiny.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

yep***


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 1:55 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way.


clemtiger117 I have you on ignore, so no point in trolling me anymore...

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:22 PM
 

because I no longer waste my time by your constant trolling. So find a new person to troll.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: clemtiger117 I have you on ignore, so no point in trolling me anymore...

[7]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:24 PM
 



I really dont care that you have me on ignore. You having me on ignore is simply due to you being unable to take someone calling you out on your BS. I am sorry taht you are not very open minded. That is a liberal trait though. Basically cry more TQ79. No one is trolling you.


Oh yea if you have me on ignore why are you even seeing my posts.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


oh, another thing clemtiger117, even though you're on ignore..


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:06 PM
 

it still shows who is the first to respond and who was the last to respond on the front page of the board, that's how I know you responded. I know you don't have the intelligence to realize that. But just letting you know I have no idea what your posting, so just give up on trying to get a rise out of me, because I don't know what you're posting or care.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: oh, another thing clemtiger117, even though you're on ignore..

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:09 PM
 

"I have no idea what your posting"

you just said you knew what I was posting.... talking out of your ### again. It is just too easy to show how full of #### you are.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


The NFL wanted it's most profitable team out of the playoffs

[8]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:24 PM
 

and it's smallest market in the playoffs. Makes sense.

2019 student level member

TigerKing please report to the post

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:26 PM
 

and provide an explanation.

2019 student level member

NFL isn't the NBA or MLB....


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:35 PM
 

Big market teams receive no favoritism in the NFL. Also, at times Jerry Jones has been at odds with the NFL, and he was good friends with Al Davis, whom the NFL absolutely hated. And Al Davis Raiders team has been screwed twice in the playoffs with the immaculate reception, which wasn't a legal play at the time, and the middle of the game invented tuck rule against New England, a ruling that the NFL has recently done away with

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Wow, now that's some convoluted logic


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:10 PM
 

The fact is that Dallas winning has been, and always will be, good for the NFL. The idea that the NFL would decide that the Packers should win is laughable. The NFL has been calling that play the same way all year. If you want to get credited with the catch you have to control it after you hit the ground. Dez didn't hold it, and therefore it wasn't a catch. Did the NFL cause Murray to fumble or the Cowboys to loose players in coverage?

2019 student level member

He did control it. Your theory is wrong on Dallas...


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:17 PM
 

Dallas has only won two playoff games in the past 18 years, hasn't hurt the NFL a bit. You're laughable for not knowing about the NFL. If it was so good for Dallas to win championships, the refs would be cheating for them to get in the playoffs and in the playoffs. This season was the first season that Dallas made it to the playoffs since 2009.

The NFL refs did refuse to call holding on Green Bay's left tackle, who was holding every single pass play. Dez Bryant did hold it, therefore it was a catch and a screw job by the refs.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Did you watch the game last week?


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:18 PM
 

I think the Lions would disagree with your premise.

2019 student level member

Re: He did control it. Your theory is wrong on Dallas...


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:19 PM
 

Did he hold the ball when it popped out of his hands after the ball hit the ground during the process of making the catch?

Learn the rules before you whine. As far as holding your line held more than any I've seen.

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Didn't the NFL say "our bad"


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:21 PM
 

Last week on an obvious Dallas holding penalty?

http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/12129092/nfl-tells-detroit-lions-officials-missed-holding-dallas-cowboys-fourth-conversion

2019 student level member

Re: He did control it. Your theory is wrong on Dallas...


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:19 PM
 

Control does not mean have the ball bounce off the turf and come loose.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Dude, you just said everything you need to know....`

[1]
Posted: Jan 12, 2015 8:53 AM
 

"Dallas ahs won 2 playoff games in 18 years"

The butthurt is strong. Let it flow.... It's going to be ok.


So if big market teams don't receive favoritism, why would


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 11:42 AM
 

Green Bay receive favoritism. Please explain why the NFL would want Green Bay to win over Dallas.


Re: So if big market teams don't receive favoritism, why would


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 11:49 AM
 

He can't TQ79 says a lot of #### he can't explain.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


Ya he's not the brightest bulb, but I was actually curious


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 1:11 PM
 

to hear his reasoning for that one. It would have been entertaining for sure.


and didn't reverse Cobb catch before half***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:28 PM
 



2019 white level member

Re: and didn't reverse Cobb catch before half***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:48 PM
 

Cobb was in bounds....

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


that one too***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:49 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

must have seen a different game than I did***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:43 PM
 




We Wuz Roooobbbed!!!!***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 4:51 PM
 




It was a good call. On 4th down, just catch the ball.***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:11 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

by "call," I mean the reversal.***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:12 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 5:19 PM
 

Who cares! Dallas and jerry jones suck!


Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 6:46 PM
 

CRY BABY !!!'
The ball was coming loose. Know the rule!!


Re: NFL wanted Green Bay to win by hook or crook..


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 10:53 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

DB23


lol funny how Karma works, last week it was

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2015 10:58 PM
 

NFL wants Dallas to win. Gotta love the crying

military_donation.jpg

This is absolutely hilarious coming from a Dallas fan.***


Posted: Jan 11, 2015 10:59 PM
 



2019 student level member


Plus I saw Roger Goodell Rip the ball out of


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 8:11 AM
 

Demarco Murray's hands on a sure TD run. Not sure how the national media didn't pick up on this.


Is that you Jimmy Jones? The ghost of Vince Lombardi is


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 1:59 PM
 

as strong as Pitchfork Ben! Go Tigers and Go GB!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

And what about Detroit?The Lions must be thinking the NFL


Posted: Jan 12, 2015 1:59 PM
 

screwed them completely! The NFL admitted to the bad calls in the Lions game.

The last I heard the NFL believes the call was correct in the GB game. It was an interpretation of a less than clear rule. The Lion's reversal was just a BAD call.


Replies: 48  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
4900 people have read this post