Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Biden
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 38
| visibility 1,465

Biden


Oct 1, 2019, 11:27 AM

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6090946119001/#sp=show-clips


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You mean a politician may have lied?!?!


Oct 1, 2019, 11:35 AM

OMG!!!

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MauldinT, where are you???


My dirty politician is less dirty than your dirty politician***


Oct 1, 2019, 12:13 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GO TIGERS!!


Re: Biden


Oct 1, 2019, 11:41 AM

He was obviously aware of his sone Ukraine ties, but who cares?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this


Oct 1, 2019, 12:18 PM

He should be.

This is where the BS just continues perpetually though, when people who want Trump to go down can’t say “you know what, Joe looks fishy as hellll in all this too, let’s get to the bottom of it.”

At best it makes your concerns over Trump’s interactions with Ukraine look like crocodile tears.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this


Oct 1, 2019, 12:24 PM

It's too bad the democrats control the justice department and every branch of government. Guess we'll never get to the bottom of the Biden corruption.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wow, that’s a new one.


Oct 1, 2019, 12:29 PM

Yes cac, there’s never been a case of overall power overriding party and sleeping dogs being allowed to let lie. Surely when a party takes control of a branch, they immediately just start investigating everyone from the past party in control.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Wow, that’s a new one.


Oct 1, 2019, 12:34 PM

So you're saying the Republicans aren't investigating Biden because of decorum? They're just going to let bygones be bygones? Corruption is just normal so #### it?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Are you saying you'd be shocked if that was the case?


Oct 1, 2019, 12:37 PM

You think anything and everything out of the pale in high level politics gets an investigation without something major predicating it?

You think you and I get equal treatment and are held to equal standards as someone in a position of power in the US govt?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Are you saying you'd be shocked if that was the case?


Oct 1, 2019, 12:42 PM

I would absolutely be shocked. I would really like horrible politicians out of our government regardless of party so please Republicans, do something about Joe Biden if you have something on him.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I have to assume you're being deliberately obtuse,


Oct 1, 2019, 12:46 PM

or else you are the first person I've ever met who believes that unchecked corruption doesn't exist on any level in the federal govt.

Sheesh, the Dems have believed Trump was corrupt on numerous levels for two years now but Pelosi didn't begin an impeachment investigation because she didn't believe it was politically expedient.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I would be shocked if that was the case.***


Oct 1, 2019, 12:45 PM [ in reply to Are you saying you'd be shocked if that was the case? ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I'd be shocked if you were shocked.***


Oct 1, 2019, 12:49 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Well I'd be shocked if you were shocked that I was shocked.***


Oct 1, 2019, 1:01 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Well I'd be shocked if you were shocked that I was shocked.***


Oct 1, 2019, 1:21 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-19b.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah I don't think "let sleeping dogs lie" is the motto for


Oct 1, 2019, 12:42 PM [ in reply to Wow, that’s a new one. ]

the Justice Department.

So Republicans freaked out over Hillary's email server, but they discover the Vice President abused his power to enrich his son and they were like, "Nah, let's let sleeping dogs lie."

Let's pretend for a second that that's what happened. Aren't you just admitting that they didn't care until he was running for president, which would make the motivation for an investigation 100% political?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You sound like you think that last statement is a gotcha.


Oct 1, 2019, 12:48 PM

Quite the contrary...I totally think it could be the case, and quite honestly, I think they could ignore it now even if they believe it because the think it could make them look vindictive in the election.

Expediency, power, and polling trumps (no pun intended) justice almost every single time in DC. Justice only wins when its popular.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


It's not a gotcha. It's a clarification.


Oct 1, 2019, 12:59 PM

I'm trying to understand your position because it's weird to acknowledge that the Biden investigation (if you can even call it that) is completely motivated by political self-interest and to also believe that it's completely legit. To me, the fact that it's entirely politically motivated is just more proof that it's baseless.

But if we have to "both sides" this thing in order to do an impeachment inquiry, that's fine. I got plenty of popcorn and I never thought Biden would be the nominee anyway.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That’s not hard to reconcile at all.


Oct 1, 2019, 1:09 PM

if Biden was guilty of something (and I do mean “if”, the following is purely hypothetical), an investigation of him could easily result in some collateral damage, including to Republicans with Ukrainian involvement. Additionally, going after him when he’s simply an ex-VP loving the life of a retired politician makes the investigators look vindictive and is more likely to generate negative emotions from the electorate than positive ones.

I hope neither of those facts is hard to swallow. If you’re still with me then, it makes sense for the issue of said corruption to remain an “in case of emergency, break glass” sort of thing, which would only be used if potential upsides outweighed the aforementioned negatives.

Any party would do this and does do this.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this


Oct 1, 2019, 12:56 PM [ in reply to I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this ]

Joe does look fishy, but that isn't a defense of Trump's actions. I think that's what gets people so excited.

Biden is being used as the 'what about' argument to justify Trump's actions.

I also find it odd that people keep railing about Joe and Hunter while overlooking Ivanka, jr and Eric's continued deal making all over the world. I mean, how do you get granted so many Chinese trademarks merely days after your dad meets with the Chinese president?

I'm outraged I tell you, O-U-T raged!

;)

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this


Oct 2, 2019, 4:35 AM

Exactly.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this


Oct 1, 2019, 2:41 PM [ in reply to I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this ]

You know what, Joe looks fishy as helll in all this too, let's get to the bottom of it.

I know the timing was better in Joe's case and he was officially acting as the voice of a coalition, but Joe's a (vastly) better pure politician than Trump - Trump doesn't understand politics, even slightly - and he's a lot better at making sure official policy dovetails with personal interest.

Trump just right on ahead and blatantly and in full view of the world pursues personal interest.

I'm still suspicious, myself. Those Eastern European pipelines are bad bad bad dirty oligarch-and-strongman money and anybody involved up to the ears in it like the younger Biden was isn't going to be as pure as the driven snow when it's all said and done.

If it takes Joe Biden down, it takes Joe Biden down. Oh, well. Not that it even slightly absolves Trump.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this


Oct 2, 2019, 4:33 AM [ in reply to I’m honestly ok with Trump getting investigated over this ]

What does one have to do with the other? Biden's son is of little interest to me. It's a non issue in the big picture for our country. Moreover, I would think the same of Trump with or without Trump's shadiness with Ukraine. I don't even want him impeached by the way. It's a waste of time. He is a dirtbag though. It just comes down to the election in 2020. He will probably win, but he is an awful human being who is terrible for the world as a whole. There are no vrocodile tears for me with Ukraine. There are no tears at all. It's just Trump. Nothing has changed.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Whoa, the smoking gun. Case closed.


Oct 1, 2019, 12:06 PM

Quick question: How can you tell what they talked about simply by looking at a picture?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


it's clear they only talked about golf grandkids and yoga***


Oct 1, 2019, 7:06 PM



badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Because a picture is worth a thousand words...


Oct 1, 2019, 11:22 PM [ in reply to Whoa, the smoking gun. Case closed. ]

That was too easy...

Next riddle plez

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Classic misleading Fox News headline. Of course what do you expect


Oct 1, 2019, 12:47 PM

from the kings of Fake News. Joe Biden didn’t say he was “unaware” of his son’s connections. He said he didn’t speak about his son’s business dealings. This headline reads like Biden said he had no idea his son was even involved with Ukraine. Fox News = Fake News.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well if he said he didn’t speak about it, that’s pretty much case closed...


Oct 1, 2019, 11:27 PM

No need to investigate or demand any transcripts. If we can’t take a man for his word nowadays, what kind of society are we living in!?



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Huh?***


Oct 2, 2019, 2:46 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Learn to read. Nowhere did I say whether I believed Biden or not.


Oct 2, 2019, 7:49 AM [ in reply to Well if he said he didn’t speak about it, that’s pretty much case closed... ]

And it doesn’t matter what I believe. But the Fox headline said the photo contradicted Biden’s statement, saying that Biden claimed he had no idea (“unaware”) that his son was connected to Ukraine. However, Biden already said he knew of his son’s connections with Ukraine, he just didn’t talk with him about details with his business dealings. So he already admitted to being “aware,” while Fox is claiming he said he was unaware, and that the picture proves otherwise. So Fox is just lying to try to push a narrative (which is what they do in most of their reports).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Learn to read. Nowhere did I say whether I believed Biden or not.


Oct 2, 2019, 12:00 PM

“He said he didn’t speak about his sons business dealings.”


Learn to comprehend simple sentences...especially ones you’ve written yourself ;)

My only point was, why would we take anyone’s statement at face value? The fact he said he didn’t discuss it is irrelevant.

Now, bow to your real emperor...Trip T bish. Outta my sight peon

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ok looney toon.***


Oct 2, 2019, 12:03 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

;)***


Oct 2, 2019, 12:13 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Learn to read. Nowhere did I say whether I believed Biden or not.


Oct 2, 2019, 7:49 AM [ in reply to Well if he said he didn’t speak about it, that’s pretty much case closed... ]

And it doesn’t matter what I believe. But the Fox headline said the photo contradicted Biden’s statement, saying that Biden claimed he had no idea (“unaware”) that his son was connected to Ukraine. However, Biden already said he knew of his son’s connections with Ukraine, he just didn’t talk with him about details with his business dealings. So he already admitted to being “aware,” while Fox is claiming he said he was unaware, and that the picture proves otherwise. So Fox is just lying to try to push a narrative (which is what they do in most of their reports).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Learn to read. Nowhere did I say whether I believed Biden or not.


Oct 2, 2019, 7:49 AM [ in reply to Well if he said he didn’t speak about it, that’s pretty much case closed... ]

And it doesn’t matter what I believe. But the Fox headline said the photo contradicted Biden’s statement, saying that Biden claimed he had no idea (“unaware”) that his son was connected to Ukraine. However, Biden already said he knew of his son’s connections with Ukraine, he just didn’t talk with him about details with his business dealings. So he already admitted to being “aware,” while Fox is claiming he said he was unaware, and that the picture proves otherwise. So Fox is just lying to try to push a narrative (which is what they do in most of their reports).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Uh oh


Oct 1, 2019, 1:17 PM

Quid Pro Joe day it ain’t so

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Biden


Oct 1, 2019, 11:33 PM

Who is in the picture? Where was it taken? When was it taken?

How do we know that is a Ukranian businessman?

It might be, but context is everything.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Biden


Oct 1, 2019, 11:40 PM

Is it of any concern to you that Shoken, the corrupt prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating corruption?

Here is a photo of Ukrainians protesting said prosecutor, along with others in 2015.

Joe Biden didn't fire anyone.

Shoken, the corrupt prosecutor is the photo on the left. This was 2015, Biden didn't didn't go to Ukraine until 2016.


badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Hunter was meeting with them to explain fracking.


Oct 2, 2019, 11:41 AM

I'm sure it was all aboveboard. Joe is from Penn and they do a lot of fracking in Pennsylvania so of course they wanted an expert to weigh in.

I see no problem with this.

signed
Pelosi

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 38
| visibility 1,465
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic