»
Topic: Illegal Substitution Penalty on NCSt Punt
Replies: 4   Last Post: Oct 21, 2018 5:05 PM by: FORESTTIGER
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 4  

Illegal Substitution Penalty on NCSt Punt


Posted: Oct 21, 2018 4:32 PM
 

Can someone explain to me the Illegal Substitution penalty they called on our return team late in the game on NCSt punt? There was never a flag thrown and the penalty was not announced until well after the play was over. I have rewatched this several times and I only count 10 Clemson Players on the field, so it wasn't due to too many players on the field. There was no one running on or off the field before the snap. There was one Clemson player who moved toward our sideline to block one of their players and after he made the block he then continued out of bounds which was weird. But by my count we only had 10 men on the field. My thinking is that there were two players with the same number on the field. And why did the referee have to confer with some side marker judge concerning the penalty?


Re: Illegal Substitution Penalty on NCSt Punt


Posted: Oct 21, 2018 4:36 PM
 

We had two #10s on the field - Derion Kendrick and Baylon Spector

2020 student level member

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Illegal Substitution Penalty on NCSt Punt


Posted: Oct 21, 2018 4:45 PM
 

This is why I never understand why you double assign numbers. YOuve got more numbers than guys so there is just no reason for it.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Illegal Substitution Penalty on NCSt Punt


Posted: Oct 21, 2018 4:48 PM
 

Thanks. That is what I thought it had to be


Re: Illegal Substitution Penalty on NCSt Punt


Posted: Oct 21, 2018 5:05 PM
 

The number thing could easily be resolved IF the ncaa would allow the number 0 before 0 thru 9.

00,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08, and 09. I’ve never understood why this isn’t allowed. Have you?


Replies: 4  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1282 people have read this post