|
Replies: 14
| visibility 972
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
I'd rather see a six team playoff model over
Dec 7, 2014, 12:54 AM
|
|
The suggested 8. Obviously 4 won't last. But I say have the 5 power conference champs automatically in and one at- large. Let the two top seeds get a first round bye.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2213]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3397
Joined: 9/2/07
|
..I rather see all the conf champions and a few wild...
Dec 7, 2014, 12:55 AM
|
|
..cards thrown in......
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1797]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1399
Joined: 11/12/11
|
6 would be perfect this year
Dec 7, 2014, 12:59 AM
|
|
The only argument would be over which teams get the bye
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
agreed
Dec 7, 2014, 1:01 AM
|
|
I like the six team model
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2861]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4308
Joined: 8/30/08
|
Re: I'd rather see a six team playoff model over
Dec 7, 2014, 1:03 AM
|
|
I don't disagree. Make a rule that the power 5 champions get in if they have 2 losses or less. You have to avoid 3 loss conference champ etc upsetting the better team in playoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
excellent added safety idea***
Dec 7, 2014, 1:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2861]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4308
Joined: 8/30/08
|
Re: I'd rather see a six team playoff model over
Dec 7, 2014, 1:14 AM
|
|
Honestly would there really be an argument with 6. 8 would let the little guys have a shot though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
Re: I'd rather see a six team playoff model over
Dec 7, 2014, 1:17 AM
|
|
Yeah, Id be ok with 8 but then u couldn't reward the top 2 with a bye and I think six remedies this. I think there should be done advantage for obvious top teams who may be undefeated .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3559]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4197
Joined: 3/21/06
|
If youre gonna wait an extra week to give a team a bye
Dec 7, 2014, 1:19 AM
|
|
Why not just have 8 teams? It would generate a lot more money too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
Re: If youre gonna wait an extra week to give a team a bye
Dec 7, 2014, 1:23 AM
|
|
The extra week is the same in either model so it's really a non issue. I like rewarding the top seeds for great years and having conference champs n only 1 at large.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3559]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4197
Joined: 3/21/06
|
It would take 3 wee3eks reguardless if it were 6 or 8***
Dec 7, 2014, 1:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [444]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 641
Joined: 9/10/06
|
6 will not work. You can't let a committee decide who gets a
Dec 7, 2014, 1:44 AM
|
|
bye. We will be stuck with the 4 team model for at least 4 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [702]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 810
Joined: 11/15/14
|
of course it could work
Dec 7, 2014, 1:48 AM
|
|
Would be better than the four we have now by far. And there is always gonna be some human element but I'm should they could find a reasonable way to figure the bye.
With your logic, just do away with the committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [243]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 450
Joined: 10/20/13
|
Re: I'd rather see a six team playoff model over
Dec 7, 2014, 3:42 AM
|
|
Go for broke, take all the FBS & FCS teams and then completely realign them into 3 groups. Make top group 80 teams in 4 twenty team conferences. Divide the conf into 2 ten team divisions. Play everyone in your division (9 games) play 2 rotating cross division teams (total 11 game regular season like it used to be). Division champs play for conf championship. Four conference champs go to 4 team playoff. Remaining eligable teams are selected for bowl games.
No subjectivity, wanna go to the playoff and be NC, win your division, the CCG, and the playoff. Didn't make it, better luck next year. Conf Champs draw for seeding in the four team playoff. No polls, no committee, win it or lose it on the field. Good teams that don't make it will still have the bowl games as a post season reward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [149]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 118
Joined: 12/1/12
|
Re: I'd rather see a six team playoff model over
Dec 7, 2014, 3:52 AM
|
|
The old set up with 6 AQ conf easily laid out a 16 team playoff. Conf Champs are the 1st round with room for four 4 non-AQ non-conf Champs deciding who is the best between them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 972
|
|
|
50
