|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
Clowney = Mario Williams with ESECPN hype...
Aug 17, 2013, 1:54 PM
|
|
Clowney is just like Mario Williams, great physical talent who shows up in spots, but is virtually non existent too much for the level of natural talent. And Mario Williams has been this way in his NFL career too. Only difference between Williams and Clowney is the conference they play in, which gives Clowney a whole lot more promotion. It's well known that Clowney takes off practices or slacks off in practices.
I didn't want to post a Clowney topic, but I'm sick and tired of seeing Clemson fans buying into a overhyped player. And my assessment above is spot on. If he played as good as he is made out to be then SCU would have easily beat Michigan, by at least 17 points. Instead SCU was saved by a busted coverage and a blown block by Michigan to beat the Wolverines.
So please Clemson fans don't believe the hype of the ESECPN hype machine. Just remember ESECPN got an average corner in Tyrann Mathiau to New York City as one of the Heisman finalists.
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 3333
Joined: 9/29/11
|
Re: Clowney = Mario Williams with ESECPN hype...
Aug 17, 2013, 1:58 PM
|
|
sorry but he is better than Mario Williams he is more like Peppers but more explosive with less size. He is a truly gifted player. That being sad I really think other than him the coot defense lacks overall talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
Watch the games, in between sacks, he does virtually nothing
Aug 17, 2013, 2:02 PM
|
|
for his level of natural talent. He is no where close to Julius Peppers. And with him already slacking off in practice, there is no way he can come close to Peppers. My comparison to Mario Williams is spot on. But continue to believe the ESECPN hype. The same ESECPN hype that said LSU was going to blow us out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [37]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 43
Joined: 5/23/06
|
Re: I don't know about you, but in the games I've watched,
Aug 17, 2013, 2:06 PM
|
|
he's been like a real life Charles Jefferson (character from Fast Times at Ridgemont High). That kid will flip you for real.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
You're a coot, so you probably have little memory of any….
Aug 17, 2013, 4:43 PM
|
|
games because of your drunken state. Or just like many shamecock fans you buy clothes and stickers from dollar general, don't watch the games and run your mouth too much off of a game you didn't watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [14]
TigerPulse: 23%
Posts: 39
Joined: 7/10/13
|
Re: Watch the games, in between sacks, he does virtually nothing
Aug 17, 2013, 2:18 PM
[ in reply to Watch the games, in between sacks, he does virtually nothing ] |
|
That is a complete exaggeration. Clowney consistently runs down plays from behind. He is consistently in the backfield disrupting the qbs timing. Does he take a play or two off... yes, but you're definitely embellishing the facts. Not to mention the constant double and triple teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
4 specific games that show his virtually non existent factor
Aug 17, 2013, 4:47 PM
|
|
between sacks from the 2012 season. LSU, UF, Michigan, and UT. And there are more games than that from the 2012 season where he did virtually nothing between sacks. LSU had him huffing and puffing in the 2nd qtr with a make shift oline. UT and UM both with good Olines, limited him to only one good play in their games against the shamecocks. And your coots should have blown out UT and UM. If Clowney is what he is made out to be, then UT and the UM games would have been blowouts in SCU's favor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
in another thread, i posted, as requested by a coot, the o.t
Aug 17, 2013, 5:34 PM
[ in reply to Re: Watch the games, in between sacks, he does virtually nothing ] |
|
nfl draft picks that doo-doo has went up against, well, they aren't that many, and they weren't too highly drafted. he is a good player, no more no less. he's not a once in a decade type talent, so get over it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1142]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 2240
Joined: 6/5/12
|
Re: in another thread, i posted, as requested by a coot, the o.t
Aug 17, 2013, 8:07 PM
|
|
Gee sarge, I guess those 5 random NFL GM's who say Clowney is a once in a decade pro prospect should really listen to you and Tigerking. Why don't you both offer your services to them. Explain to them how they've been blinded by that SEC/ESPN conspiracy hype, LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follower [251]
TigerPulse: 35%
Posts: 585
Joined: 8/1/13
|
OP, why are you so obsessed with clowney? ******
Aug 17, 2013, 2:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51524]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43075
Joined: 8/10/04
|
First of all, this isn't reddit.
Aug 17, 2013, 3:13 PM
|
|
Second, did you even read what he wrote?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1895]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3258
Joined: 7/24/10
|
So he's like the last DE that went 1st overall in the draft***
Aug 17, 2013, 2:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1142]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 2240
Joined: 6/5/12
|
Tajh, are you listening????
Aug 17, 2013, 8:02 PM
|
|
Tajh, are you listening? You really didn't get sacked 4.5 times........it was just an SEC/ESPN overhyped ghost, LOL!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2796]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 3970
Joined: 4/14/05
|
Re: Tajh, are you listening????
Aug 17, 2013, 8:43 PM
|
|
Lol... You sold your true colors on that post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1142]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 2240
Joined: 6/5/12
|
Re: Tajh, are you listening????
Aug 17, 2013, 9:09 PM
|
|
Nope! Still a Tiger, but I am a dose of truth and reality for some on this board who refuse to face it. Truly amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [108]
TigerPulse: 34%
Posts: 330
Joined: 2/6/07
|
Re: Geez...if Boyd obsesses as much about Clowney as...
Aug 17, 2013, 9:41 PM
|
|
this board does then that would explain is subpar performances against the "ESPN-overhyped" SC defense.
Unfortunately, the Clemson coaches apparently read this board and convinced themselves the board were experts, because the Clemson coaches were the only ones in the last 5 games of the season who were dumb enough leave the overmatched LT to block Clowney alone by himself.....poor fellow never had a chance.
But of course, the last three quarters with one completion by Boyd was just ESPN hype-caused.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
